Pedagogical Implications of Reconciliation Between Lecturer’s Teaching Style and Students’ Learning Style in EFL Classroom

Syafiqah Putri(1*), Murni Mahmud(2), Baso Jabu(3),

(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(3) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author



Abstract


The data were obtained through observation, interview, and documentation which was analysed based on the procedures of data analysis that consist of the data collection, the data reduction, the data display, and conclusion. The findings of this research were indicated that: (1) There are five teaching style were founded in the class. They are expert style, personal model style, delegator style, facilitator style, and formal authority style. (2) There were four learning style covered in the class. They are visual learning style, auditory learning style, reading/writing learning style, and kinaesthetic learning style. (3) It was found the way lecturer reconcile their teaching styles and students’ learning styles was that the lecturer analyse the type of learning style that students use in the class first. After identified students learning style, the lecturer adjusts with the teaching style that she used in teaching. The result of the reconciliation was that the lecturer needs to apply mixed style in teaching-learning process which related to students’ learning style

Keywords


Pedagogical implications; Teaching style; Learning style; EFL classroom

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brown, D. H. (2000). Principles of language teaching and learning, (4th ed.). white Palins, NY: Longman

Brown, H. D. (2001) Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.

Cuevas, JA (2015) An analysis of current evidence supporting two alternate learning models: Learning styles and dual coding. Journal of Educational Sciences & Psychology 6(1): 1–13.

Dunn, R. S., & Dunn, K. J. (1978). Teaching Students through their individual Learning Styles. A Practical Approach. Prentice Hall.

Fan, W., &Ye, S. (2007). Teaching Style among Shanghai teachers in Primary and Secondary Schools. Journal of Educational Psychology, 27(2), 21-31

Hinchliffe G. (2001). Education or Pedagogy?. Philosophy of education. Vol. 35. No. 1.

Grasha, A. F. (1996). Teaching with style: A Practical Guide to Enhancing Learning by Understanding Teaching and Learning Styles. Pittsburgh: Alliance Publishers.

Grasha, A. F. (2002). The dynamics of one-on-one teaching. College Teaching, 50(4), 139-146.

Kolb, D. (2012). Learning Style Inventory. Boston, MA: McBer.

Lasley II, T. J., Siedentop, D. & Yinger, R. (2006). A systemic approach to enhancing teacher quality: The Ohio model. Journal of Teacher Education. 57(1), 13-21

Liu, T. C., Kinshuk., & Graf, S. (2008). Identifying Learning Styles in Learning Management System by Using Indications from Students’ Behavior. Eight IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 978-0-7695-3167-0/08 $25.00 c 2008 IEEE DOI 10.1109/ICALT.2008.84. retrieved on August 20, 2021.

Massa, L.J., & Mayer, R.E. (2006) Testing the ATI hypothesis: Should multimedia instruction accommodate verbalizer-visualizer cognitive style? Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 321–336.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. & Saldana(2014). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook: sage.

Murray, O. (1999) The voice of Isocrates, Times Literary Suplement, pp. 3-4.

Peacock, M. (2001) Match or mismatch? Learning styles and teaching styles in EFL. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 1-20.

Proulx, T. (2006). The Meaning Maintenance Model: On the Coherence of Social Motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 88-110. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_1 accessed on July 5th, 2022.

Sugiyono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, Bandung: Alfabeta. P.13.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 49 times | PDF view : 74 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.