Analysis of the Blended Learning Perceived by the Lecturers in Post-Pandemic Era at Universitas Islam Makassar

Elsah Agsari(1*), Muh. Basri Wello(2), Kisman Salija(3),

(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(3) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author



Abstract


Blended learning is the integration of online and offline learning in the classroom. The study was about blended learning and its implementation in the classroom, as well as lecturers' perceptions of blended learning in English learning situations. The framework for this study was a qualitative descriptive method. The research subjects were English literature lecturers at Universitas Islam Makassar. The data for this study were gathered through observation, self-report, and interviews. The findings of this study revealed that lecturers had a generally positive perception. The lecturers reported that blended learning would increase their interest in teaching English and help them improve their teaching methods. It could be related to the mobility and accessibility that a blended learning environment provides. It was also very exciting to see how students were somewhat optimistic about how blended learning would help them to improve their performance. Students would have more time to collaborate with their lecturers in both online and offline classes. Students felt more at ease and eager to share their thoughts. Blended learning provided some variation in how to teach and learn for both lecturers and students. The representative approach to education revealed several challenges for educational institutions as well as students. These difficulties can include student movement and the waste of time spent learning.

Keywords


Blended learning; lecturers’ perception; students’ impact; mobility

Full Text:

PDF

References


Atmowardoyo. (2018). Research methods in TEFL studies: descriptive research, case study, error analysis, and R&D. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, v. 9, n. 1, pp. 197-204, 2018.

Baker, C. (2010). The impact of instructor immediacy and presence for online student affective learning, cognition, and motivation. Journal of Educators Online, 7(1), n1.

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. sage.

Garrison, D.R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended Learning: UNCOVERING its Transformative Potential in Higher Education. Internet and Higher Education, F(2). 95-105.

Martyn, M. 2003. The hybrid online model: Good practice. Educause Quarterly, Number 1: 18–23.

May, M., & Chudler, E. H. (2007). Sensation and perception. New York, NY: Chelsea House Publications.

Merriam, S. B. (2018). Nitel Araştırma, Çev. Selahattin Turan, 3.

Rosenberg, Marc. J. (2001). E-learning: Strategies for building online learning in the digital age. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Sainn, G., & Ugwuegbu, D. C. E. (1980). Education psychology in a changing world. London: UnwinHyman.

Shahroom, A. A. & N. Hussin.(2018). Industrial revolution 4.0 and education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 8(9):314-319.

Sharma, P., & Barrett, B. (2008). Blended Learning: Using Technology in and beyond the Language Classroom. Educational Technology & Society, Macmillan books for teachers. //(3). 289-291. Macmillan. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id books?id-E WZJGOAACAAJ

Yin, K. R. (2011). Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. New York London: The Guilford Press


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 73 times | PDF view : 9 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.