Analysis of the Blended Learning Perceived by the Lecturers in Post-Pandemic Era at Universitas Islam Makassar
(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(3) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Atmowardoyo. (2018). Research methods in TEFL studies: descriptive research, case study, error analysis, and R&D. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, v. 9, n. 1, pp. 197-204, 2018.
Baker, C. (2010). The impact of instructor immediacy and presence for online student affective learning, cognition, and motivation. Journal of Educators Online, 7(1), n1.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. sage.
Garrison, D.R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended Learning: UNCOVERING its Transformative Potential in Higher Education. Internet and Higher Education, F(2). 95-105.
Martyn, M. 2003. The hybrid online model: Good practice. Educause Quarterly, Number 1: 18–23.
May, M., & Chudler, E. H. (2007). Sensation and perception. New York, NY: Chelsea House Publications.
Merriam, S. B. (2018). Nitel Araştırma, Çev. Selahattin Turan, 3.
Rosenberg, Marc. J. (2001). E-learning: Strategies for building online learning in the digital age. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sainn, G., & Ugwuegbu, D. C. E. (1980). Education psychology in a changing world. London: UnwinHyman.
Shahroom, A. A. & N. Hussin.(2018). Industrial revolution 4.0 and education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 8(9):314-319.
Sharma, P., & Barrett, B. (2008). Blended Learning: Using Technology in and beyond the Language Classroom. Educational Technology & Society, Macmillan books for teachers. //(3). 289-291. Macmillan. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id books?id-E WZJGOAACAAJ
Yin, K. R. (2011). Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. New York London: The Guilford Press
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 73 times | PDF view : 9 timesRefbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.