The Effectiveness of Systemic Approach in Teaching English Nouns to the First-Year Students at State Islamic Institute of Parepare

Nirmala Ashari As(1*), Murni Mahmud(2), Kisman Salija(3),

(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(3) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author



Abstract


This research aimed to identify the achievement of a systemic approach and students’ perceptions. The sample consisted of 22 students from the first semester of the Childhood Islamic Education Program. This research used a parallel mixed methods design. The instruments used in collecting data in this research were noun tests for quantitative data collection and an interview for qualitative data collection. The research results obtained came from two types of data. The results of quantitative data were analyzed using the SPSS statistical test showing the effectiveness of a systemic approach in teaching nouns as evidenced by students’ scores. This result of quantitative data indicates that the mean score of the students’ post-test (82.73) was higher than the pre-test (53.55). Another supporting indicator was the result of statistical analysis for the level of sig. 2 tailed was 0.000. It was lower than  (α)=(0,05). It means the alternative hypothesis (H1) was accepted, which means using a systemic approach affects teaching nouns to increase students’ nouns mastery. The results of the qualitative data showed that all five students with an increased score had a positive perception of learning nouns through a systemic approach. Thus, from the results of this research, it can be concluded that using a systemic approach in teaching nouns is effective, as evidenced by students’ scores and positive perceptions. These perceptions also affect students’ scores.

Keywords


The Effectiveness; Systemic Approach; Teaching Nouns

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akib, T. S. 2012. Using systemic approach to improve the vocabulary mastery of the eleventh grade students of sma negeri 1 bontomarannu. Unpublished graduate Thesis. State University of Makassar.

Akil, M. 2016. Systemic approach (SA) to curriculum development (implication and application of systems thinking to curriculum development). In Proceedings of English Education International Conference, Vol. 1, pp. 6–9. http://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/EEIC/article/view/15854/11676

Al-Bhery, A. R., Salah El-Din, E. S., & Nabil Abd El-Aziz, S. I. (2010). Effects of Using the Systemic Approach on Learning Some Fencing Skills for Junior Fencers. World Journal of Sport Sciences, 3(S), pp. 407-427. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1198431

Alwiah, W. 2018. The Effectiveness of Systemic Approach in Teaching Adjective. ELT Worldwide, Vol. 5 Number 1. https://www.ojs.unm.ac.id/ELT/article/view/5798/pdf_24

Awad, B. A., 2017. Attractive Educational Strategies in Teaching and Learening Chemistry. African Journal of Chemical Educatio, 7 (3), 82-97. July 12, 2021. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajce/article/view/162212#:~:text=Attractive%20educational%20strategies%20in%20teaching%20and%20learning%20chemistry%20can%20be,which%20modern%20technologies%20are%20integrated.

Al-bidawi, S, A. 2018. Vocabulary Learning Strategies (VLSs) Preferred by Saudi EFL Students. English Language Teaching, Vol. 11, No. 12, pp. 211-220. https://www.seeu.edu.mk/files/research/Brikena_Vocabulary.pdf

Alwiah, W. 2018. The Effectiveness of Systemic Approach in Teaching Adjective. ELT Worldwide, Vol. 5 Number 1. https://www.ojs.unm.ac.id/ELT/article/view/5798/pdf_24

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., Clark. V. L. P (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3th ed). SAGE Publications.

Fahmy, A. F. M., & Lagowski, J. J. 2011. The systemic approach to teaching and learning [SATL]: A 10-year review. African Journal of Chemical Education, 1(1), pp. 29–47. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajce/article/view/82524

Frank, M. 1972. Modern English: A Practical Reference Guide. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Gay, L.R., Mills, G.E., & Airasian, P. 2006. Educational Research; Competences for analysis and Application. (2nd ed). Florida International University: Charles E. Merrill Publishing.

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. 2012. Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications (10th ed.). United State of America:Pearson Education.

Iyitoglu, O., & Erisen, Y. 2017. Delving into Flipping EFL Classroom. Europian Journal of English Language Teaching, 3 (1), 120-152. January 26, 2021. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/236106427.pdf

Mallombasi., Akil, M., & Iskandar. 2018. Developing Students’ Mastery on Adjective Using a Systemic Approach. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI). Vol. 1 No. 4, pp. 228-239. http://humanistudies.com/ijhi/article/view/27/26

Manichander. 2015. Teacher Education. Solapur: Laxmi Book Publication

Rahmaeni. 2016. The Effectiveness of Systemic Approach in Teaching Irregular Verbs at the Second Grade Students of SMA Negeri 1 Alla.Unpublished Graduate Thesis. State University of Makassar.

Shannon, F. M. 2004. New English Grammar and Exercises for ESL Students. Bloomington: United States Of Amerika Bloomington.

Thornbury, S. 2002. How to Teach Vocabulary. London: Longman.

Ur, P. 1996. A Course in Language Teaching, Practice and Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 60 times | PDF view : 11 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.