The Obstacles Faced by EFL Teachers In E-Assessment of Students in Online Based Learning

Arifudin S. DM; Syarifuddin Dollah; Haryanto Atmowardoyo

The Obstacles Faced by EFL Teachers In E-Assessment of Students in Online Based Learning

Arifudin S. DM^(1*), Syarifuddin Dollah⁽²⁾, Haryanto Atmowardoyo⁽³⁾,

(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(3) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

This research was conducted to find out what are the obstacles faced by English teachers in conducting e-assessment of students in the online-based learning process. In this research, a qualitative approach with descriptive method is used to describe the phenomena that are the focus of this research. The results of this research state that in conducting e-assessment of students, teachers face various obstacles, namely: (a) obstacles in using online applications/platforms such as internet stability, internet data availability, device availability, and less than optimal use of applications, (b) obstacles in online class management, where students tend to be inactive and not proactive in participating in assessment activities, delays, absences, and delays in collecting test results, (c) obstacles in supervisory of e-assessments, differences in space and distance make it difficult for teachers to supervise e-assessment process, so students can cheat in doing the tests given. Based on the results of the research findings above, it can be concluded that the three main obstacles faced by the teacher, greatly affect the quality and process of the e-assessment so that the e-assessment given can be said to be less effective and less objective

Keywords

Online-Based Learning; E-assessment; Obstacles; EFL teacher

Full Text:

PDF

References

Arikunto, S. 2021. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Edisi 3). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Asmuni, A. 2020. Problematika Pembelajaran Daring di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 dan Solusi Pemecahannya. Jurnal Paedagogy, 7(4), 281-288.

Bartley, S. J., & Golek, J. H. 2004. Evaluating the cost effectiveness of online and face-to-face instruction. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 7(4), 167-175.

Bennett, R. E. 2002. Inexorable and inevitable: The continuing story of technology and assessment. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 1 (1). Available at http://www.jtla.org

Benson, J. F. 2003. What is the alternative? Impact assessment tools and sustainable planning. Journal of Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21(4), 261-280.

Bilfaqih, Y., & Qomarudin, M. N. 2015. Esensi Penyusunan Materi Pembelajaran Daring. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

BSNP, Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan. 2007. Panduan Penilaian Kelompok Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Teknologi.

Cohen, E., & Nycz, M. 2006. Learning Objects and E-Learning: An Informing Science Perspective. Interdiscip. J. E Ski. Lifelong Learn. 2, 23–34.

Daşkın, N. C., & Hatipoğlu, Ç. 2019. Reference to a past learning event as a practice of informal formative assessment in L2 classroom interaction. Language Testing. SAGE Journal 36(4), 527–551.

Engelbrecht, E. 2005. Adapting to changing expectations: Post-graduate students’ experience of an e-learning tax program. Journal of Computers & Education, 45(2), 217-229.

Gunawan. 2015. Model Pembela/oroit Sains Berbasis ICT. Mataram: FKIP Universitas Mataram.

Guswanti, M., & Satria, R. 2021. Problematika Pembelajaran Dalam Problematika Pembelajaran Dalam Jaringan (Daring) Pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Di SMA Negeri 4 Pariaman. Journal of An-Nuha, 1(2), 167-176.

Horton, W. 2006. E-Learning by Design; Pfei_er: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2006; ISBN -13.

Jihad, A., & Haris, A. 2013. Evaluation of learning. Yogyakarta: Multi Presindo.

JISC. 2007. e-Assessment Glossary (Extended). Available at http:// www.jisc.ac.uk/up1oaded_documents/eAssess-G1ossary-Extendedv1-01.pdf.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2020. Surat edaran No. 36962/MPK.A/HK/2020. Perihal: Pembelajaran secara Daring dan Bekerja dari Rumah dalam Rangka Pencegahan Penyebaran Coronavirus Disease (COVID- 19)

Kizlik, B. 2012. Measurement, assessment, and evaluation in education. Academic Journals Retrieved October, 10, 2015.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. sage.

Moleong, L. J. 2007. Metode penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Raposo Rivas, M., & de la Sema, M. C. 2019. Technology to Improve the Assessment of Learning. Journal of Digital Education Rmieu›, (35).

Resmini, N. 2012. Penilaian dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Ridgway, J., McCusker, S., & Pead, D. 2004. Literature Review of e-Assessment. Bristol, UK: Nesta Future Lab

Riyana, C. 2020. Konsep pembelajaran online. Modul Pembelajaran On-Line, 1.

Sahidu, H., Gunawan, M. P., Suranti, N. M. Y., & Nisrina, N. 2020. Model E-Assessment Dan Implikasinya Dalam Pembelajaran. Journal of Literasi Nusantara.

Samani, M. 2007. Pengembangan Sistem Asesmen Berbasis Kompetensi. Jakarta: PT. Dirjen

Sugiyono. 2018. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif. R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sukmadinata, N. S. 2017. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sun, S. Y. H. (2014). Learner perspectives on fully online language learning. Distance Education, 35(1), 18–42.

Supriyadi. 2015. Kajian Penilaian Pencapaian Hasil Belajar Fisika. Ma1ang: UM Press.

Sutopo, H.B. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Dasar Teori dan. Terapannya Dalam Penelitian). Surakarta : Sebelas Maret Press.

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 100 times | PDF view : 20 times

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This is a website that publishes an open-access article distributed under Licensed Creative Commons License the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Username
Password
Remember me