The Implementation of E-Mind Mapping in Teaching Reading at Senior High School

Nurfadillah Yunus(1*), Muhammad Basri(2), Baso Jabu(3),

(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(3) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author



Abstract


This research aims to determine teacher and student perception on e-mind mapping in teaching reading, the implementation of e-mind mapping, and their impact on students' reading achievement. This research is qualitative research with the teachers as subject and students from each class taught by the teacher. The instruments used were interview sheets, observation, and document. The interview guide was given to the teachers to find out perception, implementation, and the impact of e-mind mapping in teaching reading. Checklist observation sheet to find out the implementation of e-mind mapping and students’ reading achievement based on observation of student’s activities when learning takes place and it is filled by the researcher as an observer. Based on the results of data analysis, it was found that the teacher initial perceptions were about e-mind mapping and after discussion, finally understood and argued that all students implemented e-mind mapping in learning in class and implement the three-stage of e-mind mapping namely first activity, main activity, and closing activity. Furthermore, the results obtained that e-mind mapping has an impact on students’ reading achievement, although the impacts is different for each student. Students with better implementation of e-mind mapping have a better impact on students’ reading achievement.


Keywords


e-mind mapping; implementation; reading

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brown, G. A. & Edmondson, R. (1985). Asking questions in Classroom teaching skills. London: Croom Helm.

Djiwandono,M.S.(2008). Tes Bahasa: Pegangan Bagi Pengajar Bahasa. Jakarta: Indeks.

Gay, Lorraine and Geoffrey E. Mills. (2016). Educational Research Competencies for Analysis and Applications.

Haerazi, H., & Irawan, L. (2020). The effectiveness of ECOLA technique to improve reading comprehension in relation to motivation and self-efficacy. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(01).

Haerazi, H., Prayati, Z., & Vikasari, R. M. (2019). Practicing contextual teaching and learning (CTL) approach to improve students’ reading comprehension in relation to motivation. English Review: Journal of English Education, 8(1), 139-146.

Harmer, J. (2002). The practice of English language teaching. Longman: Pearson Education

Harvey, Stephanie, (2000) a literacy consultant and staff developer for the Denver-based Public Education and Business Coalition. She coauthored, with Anne Goudvis, Strategies That Work: Teaching Comprehension to Enhance Understanding.

Imran, F., Firman, E., & Raudhatunnisa, S. (2020). Applying think-talk-write (TTW) in the Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 7(1), 57-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v7i1.1439 teaching of reading comprehension in relation to students’ critical thinking skills. JOLLT

Jbeili,I.M.(2013). The Impact of Digital Mind Maps on Science Achievement Among Sixth Grade Students in Saudi Arabia. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Science, 103 ,1078-1087

Maxom, M. (2009). Teaching English as a foreign language for dummies. Chichester and West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

Miles, Huberman & Saldana. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis (second edition). SAGE Publication. International Educational and Professional Publisher. London New Delhi.

Mohaidat, Mohammad. (2018). The impact of electronic mind maps on students’ reading comprehension. Canadian center of science and education 11.no.4

Simsek, A. & Kuru-Gonen. (2020). Raising Awarness of EFL Teachers on Questioning Types and Pedagogical Goals: An analysis through Classroom Modes. Language Teaching and educational Research (LATER).

Siripanich, Panatda. (2010).Using Mind Mapping Technique To Improve Reading Comprehension Ability of that EFL Universitas Students. Retrieved from https://fslibarts.psu.ac.Theresearch convenceprocedings2astiche.4pfo ol.pdf.

Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding. Santa Monica, Arlington and Pittsburgh: RAND


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 242 times | PDF view : 111 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.