PERSEPSI WARGA BINAAN PEMASYARAKATAN TERHADAP KESANTUNAN BERBAHASA DI LAPAS PEREMPUAN KELAS IIA SUNGGUMINASA
(1) Universitas Hasanuddin
(2) Universitas Hasanuddin
(3) Universitas Hasanuddin
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59562/neologia.v2i3.27188
Abstract
Abstract: Prisioners Perceptions about Languages Politeness in The Class IIA Sungguminasa Women's Prison. This study aims to obtain an in- depth description of the actual conditions in which prisoners' language is used. The data in this study are prisoners' perceptions of language politeness which were collected based on the results of a questionnaire survey in the field from 72 respondents from prisoners. The type of research used in this study is qualitative with a descriptive-qualitative approach. The results of this study indicate that the perception of prisoners in the Class IIA Sungguminasa Women's Prison towards the use of polite language is quite high, which is around 85% but in its use it is also often used harsh language by 82% of all inmates at the Class IIA Sungguminasa Women's Prison.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alwasilah, A. Chaedar .2003. Pokoknya Kualitatif. Jakarta: PT. Dunia Pustaka Jaya.
Chaer, Abdul dan Agustina, Leoni. 1993. Sosiolinguistik: Perkenalan Awal. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Dwidja Priyatno. 2004. Kebijakan Legislasi Tentang Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Di Indonesia, Bandung: CV.Utomo.
Gusnawaty. 2009a. “Perilaku Kesantunan Dan Konsepsi Hubungan Sosial Dalam Bahasa Bugis Di Sulawesi Selatan: Perspektif Lokal Dalam Era Global.” Journal Sawerigading 15.
Hakim Yassi, Abdul. 2019. “Ancangan Model Kerangka Teori Kesantunan Yang Efektif Mengkaji Budaya Bahasa-Bahasa Heritage Di Asia: Review Terhadap Keuniversalitasan Kerangka Teori Kesantunan Brown & Levinson.” Linguistik Indonesia 35(2).
Kridalaksana, Harimurti. 2001. Kamus Linguistik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Mahsun. 2008. Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan Strategi, Metode, dan Tekniknya. Jakarta: Garindo Persada.
Mansoer, Pateda. 1990. Sosiolinguistik. Bandung: Angkasa.
Moleong, Lexy J. 1996. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda Karya.
Oka, I.G.N dan Suparno. 1994. Linguistik Umum. Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi Depdikbud.
Rustono. 1999. Pokok-pokok Pragmatik. Semarang: CV IKIP Semarang Press.Tesis. Program Pascasarjana Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.
Sudarsono, 1992, Kamus Hukum, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Sudaryanto. 1993. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan Secara Linguistik. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.
Syahrin, E. 2008. Strategi Kesantunan Sebagai Kompetensi Pragmatik Dalam Tindak Tutur Direktif Bahasa Prancis. Jurnal Universitas Medan, NO 69TH XX(Bowen).
Tarigan, Henry Guntur. 1990. Pengajaran Gaya Bahasa. Bandung : Angkasa.
. 1986. Pengajaran Pragmatik. Bandung: Angkasa.
Yuniarti. 2010. “Kompetensi Tindak Tutur Direktif Anak Usia Prasekolah (Kajian Pada Kelompok Bermain Anak Cerdas P2PNFI regional II Semarang).”
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 100 times | PDF view : 14 timesCopyright (c) 2021 Neologia: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia
Published by:
Study Program of Indonesian Language and Literature, Faculty of Languages and Literature, Universitas Negeri Makassar.
Indexed by:
Email: jurnal.neologia@unm.ac.id
Address: Department of Indonesian Language Office, DG Building Second Floor, UNM Parangtambung Campus, Daeng Tata Raya Street, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia