Innovation in Education Service Policies in Indonesia
(1) Universitas Wanita Internasional, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Wanita Internasional, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This article examines the innovative policies in education service delivery in Indonesia. It explores the background and rationale behind the need for policy innovation in the education sector. The article discusses various innovative approaches and initiatives introduced by the Indonesian government to enhance the quality, accessibility, and inclusivity of education services. It analyzes the impact and challenges of these innovative policies and provides recommendations for further improvement. The article concludes by emphasizing the importance of continuous innovation and collaboration to ensure the provision of quality education services in Indonesia.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adams, E. L. (2021). The effect of a middle grades STEM initiative on students’ cognitive and non-cognitive outcomes. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, 100983. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100983
Agaton, C. B., & Cueto, L. J. (2021). Learning at home: Parents’ lived experiences on distance learning during COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(3), 901–911. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i3.21136
Al-Imarah, A. A., & Shields, R. (2019). MOOCs, disruptive innovation and the future of higher education: A conceptual analysis. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(3), 258–269.
Alshurideh, M., Salloum, S. A., Al Kurdi, B., Monem, A. A., & Shaalan, K. (2019). Understanding the quality determinants that influence the intention to use the mobile learning platforms: A practical study. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 13(11), 157–183. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i11.10300
Capron Puozzo, I., & Audrin, C. (2021). Improving self-efficacy and creative self-efficacy to foster creativity and learning in schools. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 100966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100966
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Drugova, E., Zhuravleva, I., Aiusheeva, M., & Grits, D. (2022). Toward a model of learning innovation integration: TPACK-SAMR based analysis of the introduction of a digital learning environment in three Russian universities. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4925–4942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10514-2
Gagne, R. M. (1970). Learning Theory, Educational Media, and Individualized Instruction.
Hoffmann, C., Kobetic, M., Alford, N., Blencowe, N., Ramirez, J., Macefield, R., Blazeby, J. M., Avery, K. N. L., & Potter, S. (2022). Shared Learning Utilizing Digital Methods in Surgery to Enhance Transparency in Surgical Innovation: Protocol for a Scoping Review. JMIR Research Protocols, 11(9), e37544. https://doi.org/10.2196/37544
Mohamed Hashim, M. A., Tlemsani, I., & Matthews, R. (2022). Higher education strategy in digital transformation. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3171–3195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10739-1
Rifuddin, B., Ilham, D., & Nurdin, K. (2020). Academic Services in Islamic Education Management Study Program The Actualization of the Basic Values of the State Civil Apparatus at IAIN Palopo. International Journal of Asian Education (IJAE) by READ Institute, 1(2), 81–94.
Saggaf, M. S., Salam, R., & Rifka, R. (2017). The Effect of Classroom Management on Student Learning Outcomes. International Conference on Education, Science, Art and Technology, 98–102.
Sierra, J. (2020). The potential of simulations for developing multiple learning outcomes: The student perspective. The International Journal of Management Education, 18(1), 100361. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.100361
Spronken-Smith, R., Walker, R., Batchelor, J., O’Steen, B., & Angelo, T. (2012). Evaluating student perceptions of learning processes and intended learning outcomes under inquiry approaches. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(1), 57–72.
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 23 times | PDF view : 0 timesRefbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Tetet Cahyati, Diah Pudjiastuti

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Website Layout dan Editing © 2021 JURNAL AKTOR pada Program Studi Ilmu Administrasi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial