ANALISIS KUALITAS SOAL MATEMATIKA UJIAN SEKOLAH KELAS XII IPA SMA NEGERI DI WATANSOPPENG BERDASARKAN TEORI RESPON BUTIR

Hasnah Hasnah

Abstract


This study aims at describing the quality of mathematics school examination in class XII IPA (Science) at SMAN in Watansoppeng based on theretical aspects (content), 1 Parameter, 2 Parameters, and 3 Parameters. This research is kind of quantitative descriptive research. The subjects of this research were all the participants’ resposes to mathematics school examination of class XII IPA at SMAN in Watansoppeng for 339 answer shets. The data collection was obtained with documentation. The data analysis technique used was quantitative descriptive analysis. The result of the research reveals that mathematics school examination has already fulfilled content validity. In 1 Parameter Logistic Model, the level of difficulty is 22.5% items which is in good category and 77.5% is in poor category. Mathematics school examination in class XII IPA at SMAN in Watansoppeng provides maximal information if it given to the participants who have the ability range -4 to -2. Based on 2 Parameter Logistic Model, the level of difficulty is 37.5% items which is in good category and 62.5% is in poor category. On the aspect distinction power, 50% is in good category an 50% is in poor category. Mathematics school examination in class XII IPA at SMAN in Watansoppeng provides maximal information if it is given to the participants who have the ability of -1. Based on 3 Parameter Logistic Model, the difficulty aspect is 65% which is in good category and 35% is in poor category. On the aspect of distinction power, 47.5% is in good category and 52.5% is in poor category. On guesses parameter, 60% items are in good category and 40% is in poor category. Mathematics school examination in XII IPA at SMAN in Watansoppeng provides maximal information if it is given to the participants who have the ability around -0.2.

Keywords


Item Response Theory

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aiken, Lewis R. 1994. Psychological Testing and Assessment. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.

Ali, M.S. & Khaeruddin. 2012. Evaluasi pembelajaran. Makassar: Badan Penerbit UNM.

Anastasi, Anne and Urbina, Susana. 1997. Psichological Testing (Seventh Edition). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Arifin, Z. 2012. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arjuna. 2013. Analisis Kualitas Soal Ujian Sekolah/Madrasah Mata Pelajaran Matematika Kabupaten Soppeng Berdasarkan Teori Klasik. Tesis. Tidak Diterbitkan. Makassar : Program Pascasarjana UNM.

Asmin. 2004. Implementasi Teori Responsi Butir dan Fungsi Informasi Butir Tes dalam Pengujian Hasil Belajar Akhir di Sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, X (48): 234-245.

Azwar, S. 2010. Tes Prestasi: Fungsi dan Pengembangan Pengukuran Prestasi Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Crocker, Linda, & Algina, James. 1986. Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.

Darnius, O. 2002. Aplikasi Software R dalam Analisis Regresi. USU Digital Library.

Daryanto, 2001. Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Djaali & Muljono, P. 2008. Pengukuran Dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Hambleton, Ronald K; Swaminathan, H; dan Jane Rogers, H. 1991. Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. London: SagePublications.

Hullin, C. et al. 1983. Item Respons Theory: Aplication to Psychological Measurement Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.

Kurniawan, E. & Mutaqimah, E. 2010. Penilaian. Jakarta: Direktorat jendral Peningkatan Mutu Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan Pusat Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan Bahasa. Kementrian Pendidikan Nasional.

Kusaeri & Suprananto. 2012. Pengukuran dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Lord, Frederick, M.1990. Aplications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems. New Jersey: LawrenceErlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Mansyur, Rasyid, H., & Suratno. 2009. Asesmen Pembelajaran di Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Multi Pressindo.

Mardapi, D. 2008. Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Tes dan Nontes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendikia Press.

Mardapi, Djemari. 1991. Konsep dasar teori respons butir: Perkembangan dalam pengukuran pendidikan. Cakarawala Pendidikan 3(X). 1-16.

Mardapi, Djemari. 2012. Pengukuran, Penilaian, & Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.

Naga, D.S. 1992. Pengantar Teori Skor pada Pengukuran Pendidikan. Jakarta: Gunadarma.

Nurhadi, Suwardi. 2010. Evaluasi Pembelajaran yang Efektif dan Menyenangkan, Jakarta: Multi Kreasi Satudelapan.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 4 Tahun 2010 tentang Ujian Sekolah/Madrasah Tahun Pelajaran 2009/2010

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia (Permendikbud) Nomor 66 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia (Permendikbud) Nomor 5 Tahun 2015

Purwanto. 2018. Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Cetakan Ketiga. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Purwanto, N. 2012. Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Riwidikdo, H. 2009. Statistik Terapan dengan Program R (Open Source). Yogyakarta: M-Press.

Ruslan. 2009. “Validitas Isi”. Buletin Pa’biritta No. 10 Tahun VI September 2009. Makassar: LPMP Sulawesi Selatan.

Setiawan. 2014. Analisis Dan Simulasi Dengan Program Win-Gen (Strategi Dalam Mengkonstruk Instrumen Soal). Majalah Ilmiah Pawiyatan Volume XXI Nomor 1.

Shabir, A. 2014. Analisis Kualitas Soal Try-Out Bahasa Inggris SMP di Kota Makassar. Makassar: PPs UNM. Tidak Diterbitkan.

Sudaryono. 2012. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Sudaryono. 2013. Teori Responsi Butir. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Sukiman. 2012. Pengembangan Sistem Evaluasi. Yogyakarta: Insan Madani.

Surapranata, Sumarna. 2004, Analisis, Validitas, Reliabilitas Dan Interpretasi Hasil Tes, Rosdakarya: Bandung.

Suwarto, 2005. Pengaruh Ukuran Sampel dan Model Logistik terhadap Estimasi Parameter Item. Jurnal Pendidikan Jilid 14 Nomor 2.

Widoyoko, E.P. 2013. Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran; Panduan Praktis Bagi Pendidik dan Calon Pendidikan. Cetakan Keempat. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajaran.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 311 times
PDF - 46 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.