Urgensi Bahasa Isyarat dalam Pendidikan Formal sebagai Media Komunikasi dan Transmisi Informasi Penyandang Disabilitas Rungu dan Wicara

Norifumi Aisyah Muhammad Amin(1*), Farid Pribadi(2),

(1) Universitas Negeri Surabaya
(2) Universitas Negeri Surabaya
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/sosialisasi.v1i1.31732

Abstract


Communication and transmission of information have a major role in human life. The presence of barriers caused by limited information and sign language skills can create gaps and communication failures. As a result, people with disabilities and speech often experience lag in their environment. This paper uses qualitative research methods, with literature study techniques. Overall, the integration of sign language into the curriculum will enable the development of a deaf culture. Applying sign language in a formal educational environment benefits both individuals with disabilities and individuals without disabilities.


Keywords


disabilitas; komunikasi; bahasa; pendidikan

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bennett, J. M. (2016). Deaf Gain: Raising the Stakes for Human Diversity . . Journal of Disability & Religion, 20(3), 229–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/23312521.2016.1203142

Borotan, A. (2019). LI’AN BAGI SUAMI YANG TUNAWICARA (TELA’AH TERHADAP PEMIKIRAN IMAM ABU HANIFAH 80 H/699 M – 150H/767 M) [Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau]. In Jurnal Hukum Islam (Vol. 2, Issue 2). http://repository.uin-suska.ac.id/id/eprint/24948

Bowman-Smart, H., Gyngell, C., Morgan, A., & Savulescu, J. (2019). The moral case for sign language education. Monash Bioethics Review 2019 37:3, 37(3), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40592-019-00101-0

Espinosa, L. (2013). PreK-3rd: Challenging Common Myths About Dual Language Learners, An Update to the Seminal 2008 Report | Foundation for Child Development. Foundation For Child Development, August. http://fcd-us.org/resources/prek-3rd-challenging-common-myths-about-dual-language-learners-update-seminal-2008-report

Fardila, U. A. (2018). Effective Communication for Special Needs Children Educators. JARES (Journal of Academic Research and Sciences), 3(2), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.35457/jares.v3i2.491

Fitzpatrick, E. M., Stevens, A., Garritty, C., & Moher, D. (2013). The effects of sign language on spoken language acquisition in children with hearing loss: a systematic review protocol. Systematic Reviews, 2, 108. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-108

Golos, D. B., Moses, A. M., Roemen, B. R., & Cregan, G. E. (2018). Cultural and linguistic role models: A survey of early childhood educators of the deaf. Sign Language Studies, 19(1), 40–74. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2018.0025

Golos, D., Moses, A., Gale, E., & Berke, M. (2021). Building Allies and Sharing Best Practices: Cultural Perspectives of Deaf People and ASL Can Benefit All. LEARNing Landscapes, 14(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.36510/LEARNLAND.V14I1.1028

Hallahan, D. P., Pullen, P. C., Kauffman, J. M., & Badar, J. (2020). Exceptional Learners. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.926

Hamilton, D. (1990). Learning about Education An Unfinished Curriculum. Open University Press.

Humphries, T., Kushalnagar, P., Mathur, G., Napoli, D. J., Padden, C., Rathmann, C., & Smith, S. R. (2012). Language acquisition for deaf children: Reducing the harms of zero tolerance to the use of alternative approaches. Harm Reduction Journal, 9, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7517-9-16

Liliweri, A. (2003). Makna budaya dalam komunikasi antar budaya. Lembaga Kajian Islam dan Studi (LKiS).

Moret, M. C. F. F., Mendonça, J. G. R., & Santos, L. C. M. dos. (2021). Pedagogical practices in the literacy process of deaf students. Laplage Em Revista, 7(3B), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.24115/s2446-6220202173b1482p.36-42

Moses, A. M., Golos, D. B., & Bennett, C. M. (2015). An Alternative Approach to Early Literacy: The Effects of ASL in Educational Media on Literacy Skills Acquisition for Hearing Children. Early Childhood Education Journal, 43(6), 485–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0690-9

Mulyana, D. (2002). Ilmu komunikasi suatu pengantar. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Padden, C., & Ramsey, C. (1993). Deaf culture and literacy. American Annals of the Deaf, 138(2), 96–99. https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2012.0623

Pratiwi, A., Lintangsari, A. P., Rizky, U. F., & Rahajeng, U. W. (2018). Disabilitas dan pendidikan inklusif di perguruan tinggi. Universitas Brawijaya Press.

Umiarso, & Elbadiansyah. (2014). Interaksionisme simbolik dari era klasik hingga modern (Ed. 1. Cet). Rajawali Pers.

Wiranda, N., & Putro, A. E. (2019). Model Identifikasi Kata Ucapan Tuna Wicara. IJEIS (Indonesian Journal of Electronics and Instrumentation Systems), 9(2), 131. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijeis.47609

Wood, J. T. (2013). Komunikasi teori dan praktik (komunikasi dalam kehidupan kita) (Ed. 6). Salemba Humanika.

Yanda, R. A., Haetami, M., & Hidasari, F. P. (2018). Pengaruh Metode Drill Pada Renang Gaya Dada Untuk Peserta Didik Tuna Wicara Di Sekolah Luar Biasa Dharma Asih. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 7(7), 1–9.

Zulpicha, E. (2017). Konflik Kebijakan Penggunaan Sistem Bahasa Isyarat Indonesia di Lingkungan Pendidikan Formal. Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi, 6(1), 100–109.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 413 times | PDF view : 119 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.