Distribusi Kecakapan Abad 21 Siswa SMK di Indonesia

Amiruddin Amiruddin(1*), Andi Muhammad Irfan(2), Muhammad Hasim S(3), Wirawan Setialaksana(4),

(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(3) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(4) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author



Abstract


Abstract. The 21st Century literacy are skills that have to be mastered by students, especially high school vocational students. Some of these skills are conventional, numeracy, scientific, ICT and financial literacy. Identifying the literacy mastery among students is the stepping stone to prepare high school vocational students in facing the 4.0 era. The current research is an assosiative quantitative research which aim to investigate: 1) the distribution of the literacy mastery among high school vocational students, 2) the association of the literacy mastery with student grades and their school regional, and the distribution of the parts of the literasy among students in vocational school in Indonesia. The current research is taken place in all vocational school in South and West Sulawesi. The research instrument are questionnaire which results will be analysed using Chi-Square Test. The results show that 1) 86.7% students of vocational school show a good understanding about the literacy, 2) the literacy are not associate with student grade and school regional and 3) most of students of vocational school shows a good understanding about the literacy, but the numeracy and financial literacy of the students are relatively in low category.

Keywords: 21st Century literacy, Vocational School


Full Text:

PDF

References


AACTE and P21 (2010). “21st century knowledge and skills in educator preparation”, paper of collaborative project by the American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education (AACTE) and the Partnership for 21st Century Skills (P21), Washington, September 2010.

Amin, A. M., Asani, R. N. C. P., Wattimena, C. R. J., & Yuniasih, A. F. (2019). Determinan Ketimpangan Capaian Pendidikan Di Indonesia Tahun 2017. Seminar Nasional Official Statistics, 2019(1), 593–601.

Andrews, Richard (eds.) (2004). The Impact of ICT on Literacy Education. RoutledgeFalmer, London.

Anggraini, S. (2016). Budaya literasi dalam komunikasi. WACANA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi, 15(3), 264–279.

Arthur, Chris (2012). Financial Literacy Education: Neoliberalism, the Consumer and the Citizen. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam.

Australian Council for Educational Research (2016). “A global measure of digital and ICT literacy skills”, Education for people and planet: Creating sustainable futures for all; background paper prepared for the 2016 Global Education Monitoring Report, ED/GEMR/MRT/2016/P1/4, UNESCO.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980

Hair Jr., J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmda.2017.10008574

Hapsari, W., Ruhaena, L., & Pratisti, W. D. (2017). Peningkatan kemampuan literasi awal anak prasekolah melalui program stimulasi. Jurnal Psikologi, 44(3), 177–184.

Nahdi, K., & Yunitasari, D. (2019). Literasi Berbahasa Indonesia Usia Prasekolah Ancangan Metode Dia Tampan dalam Membaca Permulaan. Jumal Obsesi: Jumal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 4(1), 446–453.

Nudiati, D., & Sudiapermana, E. (2020). Literasi Sebagai Kecakapan Hidup Abad 21 Pada Mahasiswa. Indonesian Journal of Learning Education and Counseling, 3(1), 34–40.

Nugraha, M. T. (2017). Budaya Literasi Dan Pemanfaatan Sosial Media Pada Masyarakat Akademik. Dalam Jurnal Pemikiran Pendidikan Islam At-Turats, 11(2), 124–132.

Nunnally, B., & Bernstein, I. R. (1994). Psychometric Theory. Oxford University Press.

Santosa, A. B. (2020). Potret pendidikan di tahun pandemi: dampak COVID-19 terhadap disparitas pendidikan di indonesia. CSIS Commentaries DMRU-079-ID, 1–5.

Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018: Insights and Interpretations. OECD Publishing.

Ware, J. E. J., & Gandek, B. (1998). Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 945–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00085-7


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 343 times | PDF view : 87 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.