Analisis Kesadaran Dan Pengetahuan Metakognitif Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia Pada Konsep Kesetimbangan Kimia

Jusniar Jusniar(1*), Muh Yunus(2), Hardin Hardin(3),

(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(3) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author



Abstract


Abstrak. Penelitian deskriptif korelasional ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis hubungan antara kesadaran metakognisi dengan pengetahuan metakognitif mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia setelah implementasi Strategi M-PBL.  Disampin itu, juga untuk melihat ada tidaknya hubungan kesadaran dan pengetahuan metakognisi dengan hasil belajar KK.  Sampel penelitian sebanyak 35 mahasiswa yang memprogramkan Kimia Dasar Lanjut pada semester genap Tahun akademik 2020/2021. Instrumen yang digunakan ada dua yaitu 1) angket MAI (metacognitive Awareness Inventory) diadaptasi dari Scraw untuk mengukur kesadaran metakognitif. 2) Tes semi objektif masing-masing sebanyak 12 item untuk mengukur pengetahuan metakognitive yaitu pengetahuan deklaratif, prosedural, dan kondisional. Rubrik pengetahuan metakognitif untuk Konsep Kesetimbangan Kimia (KK) mengadaptasi rubrik Rompayom. Hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa terdapat korelasi yang signifikan dengan menggunakan Spearman’s rho antara pengukuran pengetahuan metakognitif dengan angket MAI dan skor tes pengetahuan metakognitif konten KK. Masing-masing  harga korelasi pengetahuan deklaratif adalah r = 0,338 (kuat); pengetahuan prosedural r = 0,559 (kuat); dan pengetahuan kondisional r = 0,618 (sangat kuat). Korelasi angket kesadaran metakognisi dengan hasil belajar kategori lemah; sedang skor tes pengetahuan metakognitif dengan hasil belajar KK berkorelasi kuat.

 

Kata Kunci: Kesadaran Metakognitif, Pengetahuan Metakognitif, Korelasi, Kesetimbangan Kimia


Full Text:

PDF

References


Akker, J.B., Branch, R.M., Gustafson, K., Nieveen, N., & Plomp, T. 1999. Design Approach and Tools in Education and Training. Springer Science.

Aurah, C. M. et al. 2011. ‘The Role of Metacognition In Everyday Among Primary Students In Kenya’, Problems of education in the 21st century, 30 (9). 2011.

Borich, G.D. 2003. Observation Skill for Effective Teaching. 2th Edition. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Creswell, J.W. 2012. Educational Research. Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 4th Edition. New York: Pearson.

Dick, W & Carey, J. O. 2009. The Systematic Design of Instruction. 7th Edition. Pearson Education Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

Ertmer, P.A., Driscoll, M.P., & Wager, W.W. 2003. The Legacy of Robert Mills Gagne. Dalam Zimmerman, BJ & Schunk, D.H (Eds), Educational Psychology: A Century of Contribution, A Project of Division 15 (Educational Psychology) of the American Psychological Association. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Gayon, E. E. P. (2003). The Problem Solving Ability of High School Chemistry Students and Its Implication in Redefining Chemistry Education. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/593365/

Greenstein, L. (2012). Assessing 21st century skills: A guide to evaluating mastery and authentic learning. In Assessing 21st century skills: A guide to evaluating mastery and authentic learning. Greenstein, Laura: lauragteacher@hotmail.com: Corwin Press.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? [transfer argument]. Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f.

Hobri. 2009. Metodologi Penelitian Pengembangan (Developmental Research) Aplikasi Pada Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika). Word Editor: Office 2003.

Ijirana, S. (2018). Metacognitive Skill Profiles of Chemistry Education. Jurnal Pendidikan

IPA, 7(2), 239–245. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i2.14266

Joyce, B. R., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2000). Models of Teaching. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Landis, J.R., dan Koch, G.G. 1977. The Measurement of Agreement for Categorical Data. Journal of Biometrics, 33(1): 159-174.

Novak, J.D. 2002. Meaningful Learning: The Essential Factor for Conceptual Change in Limited or Inappropriate Propositional Hierarchies Leading to Empowerment of Learners. Science Education, 86: 548 -571.

Osborne, R. J., & Wittrock, M. C. 1983. Learning Science : A Generative Process, 67(4), 489–508.

Parlan, P., Rahayu, S., & Suharti, S. (2018). Effects of the Metacognitive Learning Strategy on the Quality of Prospective Chemistry Teacher ’ s Scientific Explanations Effects of the Metacognitive Learning Strategy on the Quality of. International Journal of Instruction, Vol.11, No(February 2020). https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11442a.

Parlan, P., Astutik, N.A.I., & Su’aidy, M. (2019). Analisis Pengetahuan Metakognitif dan Kesadaran Metakognitif Peserta Didik serta Hubungannya dengan Prestasi Belajarnya.

Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia. 4(1): 1-13.

Rahman, M. 2019. ‘21 st Century Skill “ Problem Solving ”: Defining the Concept’, Asian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2(1), pp. 71–81.

Rompayom, P., Tambunchong, C., Wongyounoi, S., & Dechsri, P. (2010). The Development of Metacognitive Inventory to Measure Students ’ Metacognitive Knowledge Related to Chemical Bonding Conceptions. International Association for Educational Assessment, (Iaea), 1–7.

Jauhangeer, S., Shuib, L. and Azizul Hasan, Z. ‘Metacognitive Skillfulness of Students in Problem Solving’, International Journal of Information System and Engineering, 6, pp.1–9. 2018.

Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003044231033

Treagust, R; Reinders, D. (2009). Multiple Perspectives of Conceptual Change in Science and the Challenges Ahead. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 89–104.

Tuckman, B.W. & Harper, B.E. 2012. Conducting Educational Research (6th ed) New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, INC.

Voska, K.W & Heikkinen, H.W. 2000. Identification and Analisys of Students Conception Used to Solve Chemical Equilibrium Problems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. (32) (2): 160-176.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 264 times | PDF view : 214 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.