Pembelajaran Blended Learning Melalui Google Classroom

Edy Sabara(1*), Sabran Sabran(2),

(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author



Abstract


Access to extensive learning resources for students gives the room for lecturers to move from lecturer centered learning to student centered learning. This can be implemented in learning based on blended learning using the google classroom application that integrates online learning outside the classroom and face to face in the classroom. With the internet that provides various learning management systems such as Google Classroom, teachers can create virtual classes to carry out online learning outside the classroom so that students are accustomed to learning actively and independently in learning. This study aims to describe the learning process of blended learning, assess student learning outcomes, find out the differences in learning outcomes of male and female students, and assess student responses. This research uses descriptive method to take the subject of material science subjects in the vocational education program of FT-UNM mechatronics, which amounted to 36 students. Data collection techniques in the form of observation, tests, and questionnaires. Data analysis techniques in the form of descriptive and inferential statistics. The results showed the learning process was in the very good category, student learning outcomes were in the moderate category, there were differences in learning outcomes between male and female students, and student responses were in the very high category.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bawden, D. (2008) ‘Origins and concepts of digital literacy’, Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices, 30, pp. 17–32.

Capone, R., De Caterina, P. and Mazza, G. (2017) ‘Blended Learning, Flipped Classroom and Virtual Environment: Challenges and Opportunities for the 21St Century Students’, in EDULEARN17 Conference, pp. 10478–10482.

Eshet, Y. (2004) ‘Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era’, Journal of educational multimedia and hypermedia. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), 13(1), pp. 93–106.

Felder, R. M. and Silverman, L. K. (1988) ‘Learning and teaching styles in engineering education’, Engineering education, 78(7), pp. 674–681.

Gilster, P. and Glister, P. (1997) Digital literacy. Wiley Computer Pub. New York.

Joyce, B., Calhoun, E. and Hopkins, D. (2008) Models of learning, tools for teaching. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Kadry, S. and El Hami, A. (2014) ‘Flipped classroom model in calculus II’, Education, 4(4), pp. 103–107.

Kirby, J. R., Moore, P. J. and Schofield, N. J. (1988) ‘Verbal and visual learning styles’, Contemporary educational psychology. Elsevier, 13(2), pp. 169–184.

Knowles, M. S. (1975) Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Association Press New York.

Laudon, K. C. and Laudon, J. P. (1999) Management information systems. Prentice Hall PTR.

Leong, K. P. et al. (2005) ‘Why generic and disease specific quality of life instruments should be used together for the evaluation of patients with persistent allergic rhinitis’, Clinical & Experimental Allergy. Wiley Online Library, 35(3), pp. 288–298.

McCarthy, J. P. and Anderson, L. (2000) ‘Active learning techniques versus traditional teaching styles: Two experiments from history and political science’, Innovative higher education. Springer, 24(4), pp. 279–294.

Merriam, S. B. (1998) Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Revised and Expanded from" Case Study Research in Education.". ERIC.

Westwood, P. S. (2008) What teachers need to know about teaching methods. Aust Council for Ed Research.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 305 times | PDF view : 302 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.