KATEGORISASI DAN KARAKTERISTIK MITOS  MASYARAKAT BUGIS DAN MAKASSAR

Nensilianti Nensilianti

doi:10.26858/retorika.v12i1.7240

KATEGORISASI DAN KARAKTERISTIK MITOS MASYARAKAT BUGIS DAN MAKASSAR

Nensilianti Nensilianti^(1*),

(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/retorika.v12i1.7240

Abstract

Categorization and Characteristics of the Myth of Bugis and Makassar Society. This study aims to inventory and reconstruct categories and characteristics (linguistic features) of myths of Bugis and Makassar through qualitative research. The myths in the oral forms were gathered from informants through in-depth interviews accompanied by recording and field notes. Data were analyzed using domain analysis, taxonomic, component, and cultural theme based on Bascom's theory (1965a). The results indicate that the Bugis myths have three categories: cosmogonic, origin, and faunal, while four categories of the Makassar myths: cosmogonic, origin, faunal, and dynasty. The characteristics of Bugis and Makassar myths tend to exhibit great similarities, either due to the influence of monogenesis or polygenesis. The fundamental difference between the Bugis and Makassar myths lies in the cosmogonic about rice, faunal about crocodiles, and human endogenic about Tu Manurung. This difference is based on the views of the Bugis and Makassar people on the origin of rice, gender, marriage, geography, and kingdom or partners area.

Keywords

category, characteristic, myth, Bugis, Makassar

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aarne, A., & Thompson, S. 1964. The Types of the Folktale: A Classification and Bibliography. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia Academia Scientiarum Fennica.

Ahimsa-Putra, H. S. 2001. Strukturalisme Levi-Strauss: Mitos dan Karya Sastra. Galang Press. Yogyakarta.

Armah, R., Murtadlo, A. & Rijal, S. 2017. ‘Mitos dan Cerita Rakyat Kutai Ikan Baung Putih di Muara Kaman: Kajian Strukturalisme’. Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, 1 (2): 151–158.

Bascom, W. R. 1965. ’The Forms of Folklore: Prose Narratives’. Dalam Alan Dundes (Ed.), The Study of Folklore (pp. 3-20). Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Prentice Hall Inc.

Berezkin, Y. (2018). The Southeast Asian Homeland of the Cosmologies’. Twelfth Annual International Conference on Comparative Mythology Myths of the Earth and Humankind: Ecology and the End of the World. Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.

Danandjaja, J. 2007. Folklore Indonesia: Ilmu gosip, Dongeng, dan Lain-lain (Cetakan VII). Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti.

Dundes, A. 1971. ‘On the psychology of legend’. American Folk Legend A Symposium (pp. 21-36). University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London.

Fahmi, R. F. 2017. ‘Mitos Danau sebagai Pelestari Lingkungan’. Deiksis-Jurnal: Pendidikan Ba-hasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 4 (2): 65–75.

Gaster, T. 1984. Myth and Story: Sacred Narrative, Readings in the Theory of Myth. In Alan Dundes (Ed.) pp. 120-23), Berkeley: University of California.

Hasanah, M. 2013. Mitos Ikan Lele: Studi Deskriptif Masyarakat Desa Medang Kecamatan Glagah, Kabupaten Lamongan. Bio Kultur, 2 (2): 157–166.

Humaeni, A. 2012. Makna Kultural Mitos dalam Budaya Masyarakat Banten. Antropologi Indo-nesia,33 (3): 159–67.

Irmawati. 2017. Mitos Masyarakat Papua dalam Novel Isinga karya Dorothae Rosa Herliany. Jurnal Bastra, 1 (4): 1–18.

Iswari, E. 2010. Perempuan Makassar: Relasi Gender dalam Folklor. Penerbit Ombak. Yogyakarta.

Lathief, H. 2003. Cerita yang Dianggukkan. Makassar: Padat Daya.

Mawene, A. 2005. Mitos Amungme: Representasi Budaya Amungme. Disertasi. Malang: Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.

Manyambeang, A. K. 1996. Lontaraq Riwayqna Tuanta Salamaka ri Gowa: Suatu Analisis Linguistik Filologis. Disertasi. Makassar: Pascasarjana Unhas.

Masriyah, S. 2014. Perubahan Cara Pandang Masya-rakat terhadap Mitos dalam Tradisi Bersih Makam Ki Hajar Welaran di Gunung Paras Desa Karangsambung Kecamatan Karangsambung Kabupaten Kebumen. Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Jawa, 5 (5): 73–78.

McCabe, D. S. 2014. Good Man Down: The Myth of

Masculine Violence in American Society’.

Mythological Studies Journal, 5: 1–9.

Nensilianti. 2018. Cerita Legenda Masyarakat Bugis. Prosiding: Kongres Internasional Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia (KIMLI), Agustus 2018.

Pettazzoni, R. 1984.The Truth of Myth: In Alan Dundes (Ed.), Sacred Narrative: Readings in the Theory of Myth, p.p 98–109. Berkeley: Asian Folklore Studies.

Rafiek, M. 2008. Mitos Raja dalam Hikayat Raja Banjar: Studi Kritis Atas Sejarah Banjar. Disertasi. Malang: Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.

Rahman, N. 2006. Cinta, Laut, dan Kekuasaan dalam Epos Lagaligo Episode Pelayaran Sawerigading ke Tanah Cina: Perspektif Filologi dan Semiotik. Makassar: La Galigo Press.

Spradley, J. P. 1997. Metode Etnografi. Diterjemahkan oleh Mizbah Zulfa Elisabeth. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana Yogya.

Tang, M. R. 1999. Saat Diturunkannya Batara Guru. Dalam Antologi Sastra Daerah Nusantara (Ce-rita Rakyat Suara Rakyat). Jakarta: Masyarakat Pernaskahan Nusantara-Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Tis, D. 2009. ‘Mitos dan Kekinian dalam Pemikiran Mircea Eliade’. Jurnal Pendar Penda, 2 (4): 6–8.

Widyatwati, K. 2014. Ritual Kliwonan bagi Masyarakat Batang. Humanika, 20 (2): 51–61.

Zaimar, O. K. S. 2014. Semiotika dalam Analisis Karya Aastra. Depok: Komodo Books.

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 840 times | PDF view : 107 times

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Published by:

Department of Indonesian Language, Faculty of Languages and Literature, Universitas Negeri Makassar in cooperate with Asosiasi Dosen Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia (ADOBSI) and Ikatan Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia (IKAPROBSI).

Address: Department of Indonesian Language Office, DG Building Second Floor, UNM Parangtambung, Daeng Tata Raya Street, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Email: retorika@unm.ac.id