Analisis Kesalahan Berdasarkan Teori Newman Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Luas Dan Keliling Bidang Datar
(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/publikan.v11i3.23756
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kesalahan mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah luas dan keliling bidang datar pada mata kuliah Geometri dan Pembelajarannya. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kuantitatif. Subjek penelitian adalah 25 mahasiswa semester empat Prodi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar Universitas Negeri Makassar tahun akademik 2019-2020. Instrumen penelitian ini adalah soal formatif tertulis pada topik geometri yang dianalisis menggunakan analisis kesalahan Newman. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa mahasiswa melakukan (1) kesalahan memahami soal sebesar 24%, (2) kesalahan transformasi soal sebesar 54,67%; (3) kesalahan keterampilan proses sebesar 88% dan (4) kesalahan penulisan jawaban akhir sebesar 89,33%. Dari penelitian ini ditemukan kesalahan jawaban pada semua pertanyaan. Ini menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar mahasiswa memiliki kesalahan konsep pada topik keliling dan luas bangun datar. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan strategi pembelajaran yang tepat yang dapat membantu mahasiswa memahami konsep geometri.
Kata Kunci: Analisis Kesalahan Newman, geometri
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Daftar Pustaka
Abdullah, A. H., & Zakaria, E. (2013). The Effects of Van Hiele’s Phases of Learning Geometry on Students’ Degree of Acquisition of Van Hiele Levels. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 251–266.
Abu, M. S., & Abidin, Z. Z. (2013). Improving the Levels of Geometric Thinking of Secondary School Students Using Geometry Learning Video based on Van Hiele Theory. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 2(1), 16–22.
Ada, T & Kurtuluş, A. (2010). Students’ Misconceptions and Errors In Transformation Geometry. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 41(7), 901-909
Alhassora, N,S.A., Abu, M.S.., & Abdullah, H. (2017). Newman Error Analysis on Evaluating and Creating Thinking Skills. Man in India, 19(97), 413-427
Atebe, H.U & Schäfer,M. (2008) “As soon as the four sides are all equal, then the angles must be 90° each”. Children's misconceptions in geometry. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(2), 47-65
Budiarto, M. T., & Artiono, R. (2019). Geometri dan Permasalahan Dalam Pembelajarannya (Suatu penelitian Meta Analisis). JUMADIKA: Jurnal Magister Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 9-18
Dayanti, P., & Nursangaji, A. (2019). Miskonsepsi siswa dikaji dari gaya kognitif dalam materi jajargenjang di sekolah menengah pertama. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 8(9), 1-9
Dzulfikar, A. & Vitantri, C. A. (2017). Miskonsepsi Matematika pada Guru Sekolah Dasar. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(1), 41-48.
Fitriani, D. A., Mardiyana & Pramesti, G. (2017). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Materi Pokok Ruang Dimensi Tiga Ditinjau Dari Kecerdasan Visual-Spasial Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Klaten tahun ajaran 2012/2013. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika (JPMM), 1(6), 27-34
Fitriani, N., & Rohaeti, E. E. (2020). Miskonsepsi siswa pada materi geometri di tingkat sekolah menengah pertama. Teorema: Teori dan Riset Matematika, 5(1), 9-16.
Hourigan, M., & Leavy, A. M. (2017). Preservice primary teachers’ geometric thinking: Is pre-tertiary mathematics education building sufficiently strong foundations? The Teacher Educator, 52(4), 346-364.
Kabaca, T., Karadag, Z. & Aktumen, M. (2011). Misconception, cognitive conflict and conceptual changes in geometry: a case study with pre-service teachers. Mevlana International Journal of Education, vol 1(2).
Kurt-Birela, G, Denizb, S , Onel, F. (2020). Analysis of Primary School Teachers’ Knowledge of Geometry. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 12(4), 303-309
Ma, H. L., Lee, D. C., Szu-Hsing Lin, S. H., &Wu, D. B.( 2015). A Study of Van Hiele of Geometric Thinking among 1st through 6th. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(5), 1181-1196
Mahmudah, Wilda. (2018). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Tipe HOTS Berdasarkan Teori Newman. Jurnal UJMC, 4 (1), 49-56.
Marchis, I. (2012). Preservice Primary School Teachers’ Elementary Geometry Knowledge. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 5(2), 33-40
Mohyuddin, R. G., & Khalil, U. (2016). Misconceptions of students in learning mathematics at primary level. Bulletin of Education and Research, 38(1), 133-162
Naufal, M. A., Abdullah, A. H., Osman, S., Abu, M. S., & Ihsan, H. (2020). van Hiele Level of Geometric Thinking among Secondary School Students. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 8(6), 478–481.
Newman, M. A. (1977). An Analysis of Sixth-Grade Pupils’ Errors on Written Mathematical Tasks. Victorian Institute for Educational Research Bulletin, 39, 31-43.
Ozeren, A. (2012). Misconception in geometry and suggested solution for seventh grade students. International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education, 1(4), 23-35
Pirasa, N. (2016). The Connection Competencies of Pre-service Mathematics Teachers about Geometric Concepts to Daily-life. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(12), 2840-2851
Pranyata, Y. I. P. (2019). Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Kanjuruhan Malang dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Geometri. Jurnal Inspirasi Pendidikan, 9(2), 77-84
Prayitno, S, Arjudin, A., & Hapipi, H. (2020). Analyzing Geometry Misconception of Prospective Teachers Using Three-Tier Diagnostic Test. Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on Education and Social Sciences (ACCESS 2019). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 465, 119-122
Schnepper, Lauren C. and McCoy, Leah P. (2014). Analysis of Misconceptions in High School Mathematics. Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.4148/ 2470-6353.1066
Singh, P., Rahman, A.A., & Hoon, T.S. (2010). The Newman Procedur for Analyzing Primary Four Pupils Errors on Written Mathematical Tasks: A Malaysian Perspective. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 264-271.
Skrbec, M & Cadez, T. H. (2015) Identifying and Fostering Higher Levels of Geometric Thinking. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2015, 11(3), 601-617
Sumule, U., Amin, S. M., & Fuad, Y. (2018). Error Analysis of Indonesian Junior High School Student in Solving Space and Shape Content PISA Problem Using Newman Procedure. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947(1).
Wicaksono, A. B. & Adhetia Martyanti, A. (2019). Analysis of Junior High School Students’ Errors in Solving Mathematical Problems for The Topic of Circle. Indonesian Journal of Mathematics Education.2(2), 61-68
Wijaya, A, Heuvel-Panhuizena, M.V.D, Doormana, M & Robitzsch, A. (2014). Difficulties in Solving Context-Based PISA Mathematics Task: An Analysis of Students’ Errors. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(3), 555-584.
Zamzam, K. F. & Patricia, F. A . (2018). Error Analysis of Newman to Solve the Geometry Problem in Terms of Cognitive Style. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 160, 24–27
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 1349 times | PDF view : 0 timesRefbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Firdaus Firdaus
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Publikasi Pendidikan : Jurnal Pemikiran, Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Bidang Pendidikan
ISSN 2548-6721 (online), ISSN 2088-2092 (print)
Email: publikan@unm.ac.id
Publikasi Pendidikan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Publikasi Pendidikan : Jurnal Pemikiran, Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Bidang Pendidikan Indexed by
