THE LOGIC OF COSMOPOLITANISM AND THE IDEA OF INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE

Isenyo Solomon Ogaba(1*),

(1) Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, Management and Social Sciences. Federal University Wukari, Taraba State, Nigeria
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/prd.v1i2.20165

Abstract


Cosmopolitanism considers the citizens of states as citizens of the world. In this way, cosmopolitanism transcends the idea of the state. The question then is, can cosmopolitanism offer a conceptual grid from where to begin to theorize the possibility of principles of international justice? Does cosmopolitanism carry a credible understanding of the relationship between the self and the other which could inform a viable and valid conception of justice for states? Does the cosmopolitan perspective contain the basis for international justice? In a world constitutive of cosmopolitan individual citizens, what constitutes and represents our agency, choice and consensus? Which of us would be responsible for working out the appropriate understanding of justice and its applicability? By merely labelling all individuals as citizens of the world, it does not offer an adequate or compelling account of the mechanisms of enforceability? And finally, and perhaps most importantly, who is the other in a cosmopolitan world?  These and many more are questions in which this work tends to shed light on. This work points that, in a world divided by nation states, this seems somewhat impractical as well as undesirable. This work argues that cosmopolitan account does offer a convincing moral perspective, it fails almost entirely in offering a compelling political narrative.


Keywords


Cosmopolitanism; International Justice; Citizenship; International relations.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Breckenridge, C. A., Chakrabarty, D., Bhabha, H. K., & Pollock, S. (Eds.). (2002). Cosmopolitanism (Vol. 12, No. 3). Duke University Press.

Brown, C. (1992). International relations theory: New normative approaches (Vol. 327). Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Brown, C. (1994). 'Turtles All the Way Down': Anti-Foundationalism, Critical Theory and International Relations. Millennium, 23(2), 213-236.

Cupit, G. (2012). Review of'Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Account', by Gillian Brock.

Cutler, I. (2014). Cynicism from Diogenes to Dilbert. McFarland.

Desan, S., Hunt, L., & Nelson, W. M. (Eds.). (2013). The French Revolution in Global Perspective. Cornell University Press.

Diehl, P. F. (2016). Exploring peace: Looking beyond war and negative peace. International Studies Quarterly, 60(1), 1-10.

Dorandi, T. (Ed.). (2013). Diogenes Laertius: Lives of eminent philosophers (Vol. 50). Cambridge University Press.

Dover, K. J. (1994). Greek popular morality in the time of Plato and Aristotle. Hackett Publishing.

Goodin, R. E., Pettit, P., & Pogge, T. W. (Eds.). (2012). A companion to contemporary political philosophy (Vol. 105). John Wiley & Sons.

Gostin, L. O., Heywood, M., Ooms, G., Grover, A., Røttingen, J. A., & Chenguang, W. (2010). National and global responsibilities for health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88, 719-719a.

Kant, I. (2008). Toward perpetual peace and other writings on politics, peace, and history. Yale University Press.

Landman, T. (2006). Studying human rights. Psychology Press.

Obilor, O. I., Iwundu , K., Okoroafor, F. O., Chima, E., & Bello, M. B. (2018). Democracy and National Development: A Focus on Nigeria. GNOSI: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Theory and Praxis, 1(2), 1-8.

Sluga, G., & Horne, J. (2010). Cosmopolitanism: Its pasts and practices. Journal of World History, 369-373.

Tan, K. C. (2004). Justice without borders: Cosmopolitanism, nationalism, and patriotism. Cambridge University Press.

Vincent, A. (1997). Liberal nationalism and communitarianism: an ambiguous association. The Australian Journal of Politics and History, 43(1), 14.

Wood, A. (1995, February). Kant’s project for perpetual peace. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress (Vol. 1, No. Part 1, pp. 3-18).


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 39 times | PDF view : 13 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.