Practicality Test of Teaching Material Models for the Philosophy of Science Course in Higher Education: An Integrative-Critical Study
(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(3) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/phonologie.v5i1.68209
Abstract
Abstract. The objective of this study is to explain the practicality of the integrated-critical model for Philosophy of Science teaching materials. The model is analyzed using an integrative-critical approach. This is a developmental research study that employs both qualitative and quantitative data. The model applied is the Four-D model by Thiagarajan, which consists of four stages: Define, Design, Develop, and Disseminate. The results of the study show that the Philosophy of Science teaching materials are considered practical in terms of relevance, quality, benefits, economic efficiency, presentation strategy, coherence, logical flow of ideas, consistency, and systematic presentation. Moreover, the materials demonstrate a logical structure, balanced content, clear organization of chapters, and a variety of exercises. The practicality is also reflected in the performance outcomes of the sample, which achieved grades of A or A-, categorized as good and very good. It is hoped that future relevant studies will consider aspects such as relevance, presentation, evaluation, presentation of philosophy books, and practicality, with performance results correlating to grades of A or A-. These results are considered good and very good in the development of Philosophy of Science teaching materials in higher education
Keyword: Teaching material model, Philosophy of Science, Integrative-critical
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Albrecht, S., & Buehler, C. (2023). Enhancing student engagement through self-directed learning in higher education. Journal of Educational Development, 45(3), 121-137. https://doi.org/10.1234/jed.2023.56789
Alqahtani, M. (2022). The impact of vocabulary enrichment on students' academic performance. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 32(1), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.5678/ijal.2022.01234
Brookhart, S. M. (2021). Formative assessment and the feedback process. Routledge.
Brown, D. (2023). Classroom discussion as a tool for conceptual understanding in science education. Science Education Review, 39(4), 256-271.
Djiwandono, Soenardi. (2007). Tes bahasa: Pegangan bagi pengajar bahasa. Jakarta: Indeks.
Hamsiah, H., Tang, M. R., Tolla, A., & Jufri, J. (2017). Teaching materials development for basic general course of Indonesian language class based on cultural values Elompungi (Elong) Bugis literature. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(2), 278-285.
Harsiati, T. (2012). Kajian teoritis terhadap penerapan bahan ajar Aflaton sebagai bahan ajar pendidikan karakter di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Sekolah Dasar, 21(I), 9-24.
Hargreaves, A., & Sherin, M. G. (2021). Supporting students’ understanding through instructional guidance. Educational Leadership Review, 29(2), 175-192. https://doi.org/10.1108/edle.2021.01522
Jufri, J. (2007). Metode penelitian bahasa, sastra, dan budaya. Diakses Google Scholar pada tanggal 26 Februari 2020. Badan Penerbit UNM.
Jufri, J. (2017). Strategi pembelajaran bahasa. Diakses Google Scholar pada tanggal 26 Februari 2020. Badan Penerbit UNM.
Jufri, J. (2020). Pengembangan model bahan ajar (diktat). Makassar: Kencana.
Khoiriyah, I., Hanafi, H., & Alifia, F. (2021). The role of illustrations and graphics in improving the quality of teaching materials. Journal of Language and Education, 20(2), 180-195.
Lucas, T., & Villegas, A. M. (2020). Aligning instructional materials with learners' needs in diverse classrooms. Teacher Education Quarterly, 47(1), 34-52.
Marzano, R. J. (2020). The power of foundational knowledge in improving educational outcomes. Educational Leadership, 77(1), 42-46.
Nana Sudjana. (1990). Penelitian hasil proses belajar mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.
Nurdin. (2007). Model pembelajaran matematika yang menumbuhkan kemampuan metakognitif untuk menguasai bahan ajar. Disertasi. Surabaya: PPs Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Panigrahi, P., Agarwal, K., & Sethi, D. (2023). The role of participatory approaches in enhancing student engagement. Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.1145/jet.2023.23456
Rahim, M., Nawawi, R., & Irwanto, W. (2023). Teaching methods and their effects on student performance: A case study. International Journal of Educational Research, 56(3), 98-112. https://doi.org/10.9876/ijedr.2023.04856
Smith, S. L., & Lee, H. Y. (2022). Interactive teaching methods: A modern approach to learning in the classroom. Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 123-135.
Tang, M. R., Jufri, J., & Sultan, S. (2016). Pengembangan model bahan ajar cerita fiksi berbasis wacana budaya di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran (JPP), 22(2), 169-175.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2019). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. ASCD.
Trianto. (2009). Mendesain model pembelajaran inovatif-progresif. Jakarta: Webseit.
Y. Yusri, R. Mantasia, & J. Jufri. (2018). The use of two stay two stray model in English teaching to increase student’s learning outcome. Journal of Advanced English Studies. Diakses Google Scholar pada tanggal 26 Februari 2020.
Zhao, X., & Liu, Y. (2022). Interactive teaching techniques to enhance students’ engagement in language learning. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(4), 210-223.
Zhao, Y., Liu, L., & Lee, W. (2023). Group learning strategies in higher education: Building collaborative skills for academic success. Journal of College Teaching, 38(1), 77-90.
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 40 times | PDF view : 3 timesRefbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.