jurnal nalar pendididikan

Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process

Jurnal Nalar Pendidikan (JNP) currently applies rules in a standardized review process.
All users who will publish articles in the Jurnal Nalar Pendidikan (JNP) must undergo a full peer review, the main characteristics of which are listed below:

  • Each research article will be reviewed by two qualified experts.
  • Stages of the process starting from peer review, editing, copyediting, and proofreading usually take 3-4 months.
  • The decision to accept publication is made by the Editor-in-Chief of the journal based on the review given.
  • Editorial Board members participate in providing insights, advice and input to the Editor in Chief in general and to assist in making decisions about the articles under review
  • Section Editors and Editorial Assistants provide administrative support that enables Jurnal Nalar Pendidikan (JNP) to maintain the integrity of double-blind peer review while providing fast turnaround and maximum efficiency for authors, reviewers, and editors alike.
  • Jurnal Nalar Pendidikan (JNP) also benefits from the process of referencing manuscripts from high-quality peer reviews conducted by established journals.

Peer review provisions of referenced scientific publications:
The Editors of the Jurnal Nalar Pendidikan (JNP) will immediately decide whether to accept, reject, or request revision of the referred paper based on reviews and editorial insights from supporting journals. In addition, the Editor will have the option to seek additional reviews when needed. Authors will be notified when the Editor decides further review is necessary.

Peer review provisions based on the reviewer's assessment results:
Articles submitted directly to the Jurnal Nalar Pendidikan will be fully peer reviewed by two qualified experts in the field chosen by the Editor in Chief. The Chief Editor or appointed member of the Editorial Board will then decide whether to accept, reject or request a revision based on the reviews and comments received.
The editor will decide whether each submission reports on well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.