The Effect of Lecturers Teaching Performance on Students Satisfaction in a University

Fajriani Azis(1*), Muhammad Azis(2), M. Yusuf A. Ngampo(3), Abd Rijal(4),

(1) Department of Accounting Education, Faculty of Economics, Makassar State University
(2) Department of Accounting Education, Faculty of Economics, Makassar State University
(3) Department of Accounting Education, Faculty of Economics, Makassar State University
(4) Department of Accounting Education, Faculty of Economics, Makassar State University
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/jo.v7i2.30408

Abstract


Student learning satisfaction is one of the indicators of teachers or lecturers success in teaching performance. It is assumed that the greater student satisfaction with a lecturer’s teaching style equates to better teaching performance by the lecturer. Current research  has established that students satisfaction level within a university learning environment correlates with the lecturers teaching performance. The present study took place within a university examining students and lecturers in the Faculty of Economics at Makassar State University  in  Indonesia.  The  sample  comprised  81  individuals  who  were investigated using a correlational descriptive study model. Data were gathered through questionnaires and the study of documents and then further analysed using a regression model  that  consisted  of  R2,  F,  t,  and  determination  tests.  Findings  were  that  a lecturer’s performance, which involves preparation, opening, core, and closing activities in a lesson, positively and significantly correlated with student satisfaction levels.


Keywords


Lecturers teaching performance; student satisfaction; tertiary education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto S. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta 2002.

Arifin A. Kinerja Guru Pembimbing Sekolah Menengah Umum. Disertasi Universitas Negeri Jakarta 2004.

As’ad M. Psikologi Industri: Seri Ilmu Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi keempat. Yogyakarta: Liberti 2001.

Babin BJ, Griffin M. The nature of satisfaction: an updated examination and analysis. Journal of Business Research. 41(2):127-36, 1998.

Byars L, Leslie, MR. Human Resource and Personnel Management. Illinois: Rechard D. Irwin, Inc. 2000.

Davis K, Newstrom D. Perilaku dalam Organisasi. Terjemah: Agus Dkarma Jilid 1 Jakara: Erlangga 1996.

Ferguson G. Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education. Singapore: McGraw-Hill International Book Co, 1985.

Gujarati D. Basic Econometrics, McGraw-Hill, Inc. International Editions, New York. 1998.

Herzberg F. Work and Nature of Man. New York: World Publishing Company 1969.

Kotler P. Marketing Management, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc. 2000.

Mangkunegara. Evaluasi Kinerja Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: PT. Rafika

Aditama 2009. Mathis LR, Jackson JH. Human Resource Management 9th Edition. Ohio: Cincinnati South Western College Publishing 2000.

McMillan JH, Schumacher S. Research in Education; A Conceptual Introduction. Fifth Edition. United States: Addison Wesley Longman Inc. 2001.

Mukhtar. Merambah Manajemen baru: Pendidikan Tinggi Islam. Jakarta CV. Misaka Galiza 2003.

Mwita IJ. Performance management model: A systems-based approach to public service quality. International Journal of Public Sector Management. Feb 1;13(1):19-37 2000.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 19 Tahun tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. 2005.Bandung: Fokus Media 2005.

Rosyada D. Paradigma Pendidikan Demokratis, Sebuah Model Pelibatan Masyarakat dalam Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Prenada Media 2004.

Simamora H. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: STIE. YKPN. 2006.

Soesetijo. Hubungan antara Perilaku Kepemimpinana Kepala Sekolah, Iklim Organisasi Sekolah, Motivasi Kerja Guru dengan Kepuasan Kerja Guru pada SMP Negeri 5 Kabupaten Tuban. Disertasi Tidak Diterbitkan. Malang PPS Universitas Negeri Malang 2007.

Sudjana N. Metode Statistika. Bandung: Penerbit Transito 1992.

Sudjana N. Dasar-Dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensido Offset 2002.

Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Administrasi, Edisi K-14, Bandung; Alfabeta 2006.

Sugiyono. Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta 2011.

Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen. Jakarta:BP. Panca Bakti 2006.

Undang-Undang RI. Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. (http//www.isi-dps.ac.id) tanggal akses 13 Januari 2011.

Vroom VH. Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley and Sons 1964.

Wexley KN, Yukl, GA. Organizational Behavior and Personnel Psychology. Home Word: Illinois: Recard D Irwin 1977.Wallace,M. and K.Pocklington, 2002. Managing Complex Educational Change: Large-Scale Reorganisation of Schools. London,UK: Routledge Falmer.

Waverman,L, Kalyan D,JanneR (2011). Connectivity Scorecard,http://academy.int/moodle/pluginfile.php/38538538/mod-resource/content/1/ConnectivityScorecard.pdf. (15 April 2014).


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 239 times | PDF view : 33 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Fajriani Azis, Muhammad Azis, M. Yusuf A. Ngampo, Abd Rijal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Article copyright © to the Authors

Jurnal Office: Jurnal Pemikiran Ilmiah dan Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran has been Indexed and Abstracted by:

Jurnal Office: Jurnal Pemikiran Ilmiah dan Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran articles published by the Program Studi Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran Universitas Negeri Makassar, and have been peer-reviewed before publication. Read our Plagiarism Policy and the use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Use.

This is a website that publishes an open-access article distributed under Licensed. This work is licensed Creative Commons License under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Website layout and design copyright © by Program Studi Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran Universitas Negeri Makassar