The Emergence of Civil Society in Hobbesian Philosophy

Edor John Edor(1*),

(1) Public Administration Department, Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/jo.v6i2.17418

Abstract


The origin of the modern state has left many scholars intellectually engaged. Sociologists, psychologists, political scientists, jurists, anthropologists, and philosophers have variously grappled with the issue of the origin of the state. Thomas Hobbes is one of the great thinkers who has contributed to the discussion on the origin of the state. Thomas Hobbes is of the view that naturally, that is, man in the state of nature, is a-social, atavistically thinking about himself alone. Because of this atomistic and solitary disposition of man in the state of nature, the society was accentuated by an unprecedented degree of rancor, acrimony and obfuscation. Given this picture of man and the pre-civil-society depicted by Hobbes, one would feel that justifying the emergence of the civil society would become difficult. This paper examines how Hobbes migrated man from the state of nature to the civil society in spite of the gory picture of him he had painted. Thomas Hobbes’ theory of the origin of the state is categorized in the class of the social contract theories.

 


Keywords


State of Nature; Social Contract; Civil Society; Authority.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Addison, T. (2011). From Conflict to Reconstruction: A Revival of the Social Contract. Wesley: Perason Education Inc.

Akpan, C. O. (2004). The Place of Civil Disobedience in Nigerian Democracy: A Philosophical Appraisal. Sophia: An African Journal of Philosophy, 7(1), 39-45.

Boyd, R. (2018). Between grammar and style: Adam Smith and the moral geographies of civil society. Political Geography, 67(1), 115-124.

Dreitzel, H. (2003). The reception of Hobbes in the political philosophy of the early German Enlightenment. History of European Ideas, 3, 255-289.

Frisch, M. J. (1993). The emergence of nationalism as a political philosophy. History of European Ideas, 885-890.

Hobbes, T. (1989). Leviathan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Locke, J. (1970). Two Treatises of Government . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Malesworth, W. E. (1966). The English Work of Hobbes of Malmerbury. Vol V. Londone: Scientia Verlag Aelen.

Moore, B., & Bruder, K. (1990). Philosophy: The Power of Ideas. Boston: MaGraw Hill.

Nussbaum, M. (2006). Frontiers of Justice. London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Nwoko, M. (1988). Basic World Political Theories. Nekede: Claretian Institute of Philosophy.

Ogar, J., & Akpan, B. (2016). Historical Perspective on Social Justice. OmniScience: A Multi-disciplinary Journal, 6(3), 39-46.

Plamentaz, J. (1963). Man and Society: A Critical Examination of Some Important Social and Political Theories from Machavelli to Marx. London: Longman Publishers.

Ramaswamy, S., & Mukherjee, S. (1999). A History of Political Though: Plato to Marx. India: Prentice Hall.

Rousseau, J. (1973). The Social Contrac and Discourses, Trans and Into by George Cole. London: J.M. Dent tans Sons Ltd.

Sabin, G., & Thorson, T. L. (1973). A History of Political Theory, Fourth Edition. London: IBH Publishing Co.

Stefano, C. D. (1983). Masculinity as ideology in political theory: Hobbesian man considered. Women's Studies International Forum, 6(6), 633-644.

Stewart, S., & Dollbaum, J. M. (2017). Civil society development in Russia and Ukraine: Diverging Paths. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 50(3), 1-14.

Waller, B. (2016). Consider Ethics: Theory and Reading. Boston: Pearson Learning Solutions Books.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 1573 times | PDF view : 118 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Edor John Edor

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.