The Effectiveness of Tax Revenue Levels Before And After The Use Of E-Billing Method At Tax Service Pratama Office Makassar Utara

Adi Adi

The Effectiveness of Tax Revenue Levels Before And After The Use Of E-Billing Method At Tax Service Pratama Office Makassar Utara

Adi Adi^(1*),

(1) Accounting Education Study Program, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study aims at finding out the use of e-billing method in increasing the effectiveness of the realization of tax payable as stated in the the Tax Service Office of Makassar Utara. The variables in this research are the independent variables of the receiver as the independent variables and billing as the dependent variables. The population of this research is the realization of tax payable occurring in the Tax Service Office of Makassar Utara. The sample in this research is the realization of the receipts of the year 2011 to the year 2016. The data collection techniques used was documentation. The data analysis technique used is the effectiveness. The result of the research show that: (1) the effectiveness of Tax payable in Tax Service Pratama Office Makassar Utara before the application of e-billing system in 2011 amounted to 97%, the year of 2012 was 88,29% and 68,93% in 2013. (2) the effectiveness of tax payable in the first year of e-billing implementation in 2014 which was 102%, 94% in 2015 and 97% in 2016. The average rate of tax payable effectiveness before the use of e-billing was 88.74% and the tax payable effectiveness rate after the application of e-billing was 97,6%. This shows that the use of e-billing system has been able to improve the effectiveness of tax revenue in Tax Service Pratama Office Makassar Utara. Hence, the hypotheses proposed in the study are accepted.

Keywords

Tax; Tax Revenue Levels; E-Billing

Full Text:

PDF

References

Creswell, J. W. (1999). Mixed-method research: Introduction and application. In Handbook of educational policy (hal. 455–472). Elsevier.

Creswell, J. W. (2010). Mapping the developing landscape of mixed methods research. SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research, 2, 45–68.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Eriksen, K., & Fallan, L. (1996). Tax knowledge and attitudes towards taxation; A report on a quasi-experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(3), 387–402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(96)00015-3

Hajawiyah, A., Suryarini, T., Kiswanto, & Tarmudji, T. (2021). Analysis of a tax amnesty’s effectiveness in Indonesia. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 44, 100415. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2021.100415

John W Creswell. (2013). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed (Tiga). Pustaka Pelajar.

Mas’ud, A., Manaf, N. A. A., Saad, N., & Abdo, H. (2020). A ‘Crypto Tax Assessment Index (C-TAI)’ for oil and gas industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 268, 122035. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122035

Ohemeng, F. L. K., & Owusu, F. Y. (2015). Implementing a revenue authority model of tax administration in Ghana: An organizational learning perspective. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(3), 343–364.

Olsen, J., Kasper, M., Kogler, C., Muehlbacher, S., & Kirchler, E. (2019). Mental accounting of income tax and value added tax among self-employed business owners. Journal of Economic Psychology, 70, 125–139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2018.12.007

Qi, S., & Schlagenhauf, D. (2021). The Kansas Tax Experiment: The Matter of Legal Form of Organization. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 104271. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2021.104271

Robbins, B., & Kiser, E. (2020). State coercion, moral attitudes, and tax compliance: Evidence from a national factorial survey experiment of income tax evasion. Social Science Research, 91, 102448. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102448

Thuronyi, V. B. T.-C. to E. A. (2004). Presumptive Taxation of the Hard-to-Tax. In Taxing the Hard-to Tax:Lessons from Theory and Practice (Vol. 268, hal. 101–120). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0573-8555(04)68805-5

Whait, R. B., Christ, K. L., Ortas, E., & Burritt, R. L. (2018). What do we know about tax aggressiveness and corporate social responsibility? An integrative review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 542–552. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.334

Wrede, M. (2014). Fair inheritance taxation in the presence of tax planning. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 51, 12–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2014.03.007

Wynter, C. B., & Oats, L. (2018). Don’t worry, we are not after you! Anancy culture and tax enforcement in Jamaica. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 57, 56–69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2018.01.004

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 74 times | PDF view : 13 times

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This is a website that publishes an open-access article distributed under Licensed Creative Commons License the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Username
Password
Remember me