KONSEPTUAL FRAMEWORK DALAM KRITIK SENI: KOLEKTIF INTERPRETASI KARYA SENI RUPA KONTEMPORER

Faizal Erlangga Makawi(1*),

(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/i.v6i2.38461

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tingkat kemampuan berpikir secara kritis mahasiswa pendidikan seni rupa ketika menginterpretasi karya seni rupa, dengan teori dari konseptual framework. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kualitatif analisis menggunakan metode dari Freeman (1995) konseptual framework yang terdiri dari empat agensi yakni, seniman, karya seni, dunia dan audiens. Sumber dari data penelitian ini adalah: (1) Mahasiswa Pendidikan Seni Rupa angkatan 2020 yang berada pada semester lima, dengan jumlah mahasiswa 16 Orang; dan (2) hasil wawancara mahasiswa terhadap karya seni kontemporer karya Firman Djamil dengan teori konseptual framework. Selanjutnya, teknik pengumpulan data yang diaplikasikan adalah wawancara secara kolektif dalam menginterpretasi karya seni rupa kontemporer secara kritis. Kemudian, data yang telah terkumpul dianalisis dengan menggunakan Freeman (1995) Framework. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa; (1) Mahasiswa mampu menganalisis secara kritis karya kontemporer menggunakan Konseptual Framework secara kolektif; (2) Mahasiswa juga mampu mengkorelasi antara satu agensi dengan agensi lain dalam menafsirkan makna karya seni dan ;(3) Dengan metode ontologi realitas sosial, mahasiswa yang tidak terbiasa berpikir kritis, menjadi terbantu dalam berpikir kritis. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa metode konseptual framework harus diimplementasikan kedalam mata kuliah kritik seni, karena hal ini dapat mengembangkan pola pikir secara kritis dalam menginterpretasi karya seni rupa.

Kata Kunci: Konseptual framework; Realitas Sosial; Kritik Seni; Pendidikan Seni Rupa; Kontemporer; Berpikir Kritis.

 

Abstract

This research aims to understand the level of critical thinking of visual arts students when interpreting contemporary artwork collectively, utilising the theory of the conceptual framework. The research used a qualitative research analysis utilizing Freeman’s (1995) conceptual framework which consists of four agencies namely artist, artwork, world, and audience. The research data was collected from: (1) Visual arts students in the fifth-semester intake in 2020, with a total number of 16 students; and (2) results of students’ interviews with contemporary artwork by Firman Djamil utilising the conceptual framework theory. Following this, my method of collecting the data is an interview of students’ collective interpretation of contemporary artworks critically. The collected data is then analyzed with a Freeman (1995) framework. The result of this research shows; (1) Students are able to analyze critically when interpreting contemporary artwork collectively using the conceptual framework; (2) Students are also able to correlate between one agency to the other agencies when interpreting the meaning of the artwork and ; (3) with an ontology of realist theory, students are able to think critically even they are not used to think critically. This research concludes that the conceptual framework method should be implemented within an art criticism course because this can help students to develop their sense of critical thinking when interpreting the artwork.

Keywords: Conceptual framework; Social Reality; Art Criticism; Visual Arts Education; Contemporary; Critical Thinking.



Keywords


Conceptual framework; Social Reality; Art Criticism; Visual Arts Education; Contemporary; Critical Thinking.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bowman, M. (2020). The Work of Art Criticism: Collaboration, Communication, Community. Arts, 9(4), 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts9040101

Brown, N. C. M. (2017). The Frames and Relational Aesthetics. (In: Studies in Philosophical Realism in Art, Design and Education. Landscapes: The Arts, Aesthetics, and Education,). 20 (pp. 137-146). Springer, Cham.

Cohen, L. (2017). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539

Demirel, İ. N., & Buyurgan, S. (2017). Analysing the Relationship between Critical Thinking Skills and Problem Behaviours of Children at Social Risk through Visual Arts Education. TED EĞİTİM VE BİLİM. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.6389

Freeman, N. H. (1995). The emergence of a framework theory of pictorial reasoning (in Lange-Kuttner&G.V. Thomas [Eds]Drawing and Looking: Theoretical Approaches to Pictorial Representation in Children.). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp.135-156.

Gherasim, G. C. (2015). American Art Criticism between the Cultural and the Ideological (II). American, British and Canadian Studies Journal, 25(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1515/abcsj-2015-0006

Holmes, L. (2012). Perversion and pathology: A critique of psychoanalytic criticism in art. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 4(1), 19038. https://doi.org/10.3402/jac.v4i0.19038

Judith, B. (2016). Interpreting the Frames and the Conceptual Framework: A Visual Arts Teacher’s Implementation of the New South Wales Visual Arts Syllabi Constructs Within Classroom Practice. Art Education, 69(2), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1141650

Maras, K. (2007). Creativity, theory building and art learning (in in J. Butcher and L. McDonald [Eds] Making a Difference: Challenges for Teachers, Teaching and Teacher Education.). Rotterdam: Sense, pp. 110-123.

Maras, K. (2010). Age-Related Shifts In The Theoretical Constraints Underlying Children’s Critical Reasoning in Art. 33(1), 9.

Maras, K. (2018a). Mind, Language and Artworks as Real Constraints on Students’ Critical Reasoning about Meaning in Art. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 37(3), 530–540. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12152

Maras, K. (2018b). A Realist Account of Critical Agency in Art Criticism in Art and Design Education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 37(4), 599–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12206

Searle, J. R. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.

Searle, J. R. (2000). Mind, Language and Society. London: Phoenix.

Searle, J. R. (2006). Social ontology: Some basic principles. Anthropological Theory, 6(1), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499606061731


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 534 times | PDF view : 3 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 JURNAL IMAJINASI

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Alamat Redaksi:
Gedung DE Lantai 2 Kampus FSD UNM Parangtambung
Jl. Daeng Tata Makassar 90224
E-mail: imajinasi@unm.ac.id

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Imajinasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Imajinasi indexed by