Why They Act The Way They Do?: Pedagogical Practices of Experienced Vocational English Language Teachers in Indonesia

Akhyar Rido(1*),

(1) Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v4i2.9935

Abstract


This study was aimed at revealing pedagogical practices of experienced vocational English language teachers, focusing on their lesson planning as well as teaching and classroom management practices, and to understand why they act the way they do. Data were collected through interviews with 5 selected experienced vocational English language teachers and 28 sessions of observations. The results indicated that, in terms of lesson planning practices, they designed potential lesson content from various sources, identified specific linguistic goals, and made appropriate decisions about time sequencing. In terms of teaching practices, they employed a wide variety of techniques (scaffolding, discussion, games, presentation, writing/drawing, and individual task), focused on speaking skills, used handouts, and utilized colourful markers and whiteboard. In terms of classroom management practices, they organized students into groups/pairs, moved around the classroom, arranged classroom in traditional way, addressed misbehaviour, and gave reward and punishment. The pedagogical practices were able to promote effective learning and give positive impact on the students’ behaviour. The results of this study can be used by relevant stakeholders as one of the platforms to understand the current pedagogical practices of experienced vocational English language teachers in Indonesia.

Keywords


pedagogical practices, experienced teachers, vocational English language classroom

Full Text:

pdf

References


Balllentine, J.H. (1997). The sociology of education: a systematic analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Barliner, D.C. (2005). The near impossibility of testing for teacher quality. Journal of Teacher Education, 56: 205-213.

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy. New York: Pearson Longman.

Bucci, Terri T. (2003). Researching expert teachers: who should we study?. The Educational Reform, 68 (1): 82-88.

Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. 2014. Data pokok SMK. http://datapokok.ditpsmk.net/ cited on 26 Januray 2019.

Hafidah Mohamed. (2001). Pemikiran guru cemerlang: Implikasinya terhadap perkembangan profesionalisme guru. Tesis Doktor Falsafah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Jacobs, J., Gregory. A., & Hoppey, D. (2009). Data literacy: Understanding teachers’ data use in a context of accountability and response to intervention. Action in Teacher Education, 31 (3): 41-45.

Li, D. (1998). It is always more difficult then you plan and imagine: teachers perceived difficulties in introducing the communicative approach in South Korea. TESOL Quarterly, 32: 677-703.

Lie, Anita. (2007). Education policy and EFL curriculum in Indonesia: between the commitment to competence and the quest for high scores. TEFLIN Journal, 18 (1): 1-4.

Lin, Yuen. (2007). Presentation: an initial step to introduce structures and functions. International Forum of Teaching and Studies, 3 (1): 24-30.

Marcellino, M. (2008). English language teaching in Indonesia: a continuous challenge in education and cultural diversity. TEFLIN Journal, 19 (1): 57-69.

Mattarima, Karim & Hamdan, A.R. (2011). The teaching constraints of English as a foreign language in Indonesia: the context of school based curriculum. Sosiohumanika, 4 (2): 287-300.

Ministry of Education and Culture. (2013). Statistics of UKG. http://ukg.kemdikbud.go.id/info/?id=grafikpelaksanaan&jenis=nprof&level=1&gdx=547&idx=12 cited on 25 July 2019.

Ministry of National Education. (2005). Rencana Pendidikan Nasional Jangka Panjang 2005-2025. Jakarta: Ministry of National Education Republic of Indonesia.

Nadeem, Mubasher., Iqbal, Zaful., & Rahman, Abdul. (2012). Seating arrangement in EFL class: An observation on public and private sectors’ EFL teaching at grade 10/o’ level. International Journal of Research in Linguistics and Lexicography, 1 (4): 11-20.

Noraini Ibrahim., Azliza Haniem., & Nambiar, M.K. Radha. (2013). What master teachers do: A case study of planning, facilitating, role modeling, and developing materials. International Education Studies, 6 (6): 86-94.

Rice, J.K. (2003). Teacher quality: Understanding the effectiveness of teacher attributes. Washington D.C.: The Economic Policy Institute.

Richards, Jack C. (2011). Competence and performance in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rido, Akhyar & Sari, Fatimah Mulya. (2018). Characteristics of classroom interaction of English in language teachers in Indonesia and Malaysia. International Journal of Language Education, 2 (1): 40-50.

Rido, Akhyar. (2017). What do you see here from this picture?: Questioning strategies of master teachers in Indonesian vocational English classrooms. TEFLIN Journal, 28 (2): 193-211.

Rido, Akhyar., Noraini Ibrahim., & Nambiar, M.K. Radha. (2015). Interaction strategies of master teachers in Indonesian vocational classroom: A case study. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 21 (3): 85-98.

Suharti. (2013). Trends in education in Indonesia. In Suryadharma, Daniel & Jones, Gavin. W. Education in Indonesia (pp. 15-52). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Tsui, Amy B. M. (2003). Understanding expertise in teaching: case studies in ESL teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen.

Wasimin. (2009). Pemberdayaan guru bahasa Inggris pada sekolah menengah kejuruan rintisan sekolah bertaraf internasional (SMK-RSBI) di Indonesia. Dialogue Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Kebijakan Publik, 6 (1): 37-53.

Weaver II, L. Richard., Wenzlaff, Sue., & Cotrell, W. Howard. (1993). How do students see master teachers?. The Education Digest, 59 (2): 12-15.

Xuerong Fan. (2012). Excellent English teachers’ classroom strategies: A case study of three college English teacher in China. Higher Education Social Sciences, 2 (1): 1-7.

Zulfikar, Teuku. (2009). The making of Indonesian education: an overview on empowering Indonesian teachers. Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities, 2: 13-39.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 1262 times | pdf view : 173 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


License URL: https://creativecommons.org/

 

 

 

Creative Commons License


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.