How Competence of Production, Attention, Retention, Motivation, and Innovation can Improve Students’ Scientific Writing Skills

Indrya Mulyaningsih(1*), Wahyudi Rahmat(2), Djohar Maknun(3), Winci Firdaus(4),

(1) Institut Agama Islam Negeri Syekh Nurjati Cirebon (ID Scopus: 57200991886)
(2) Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat |SINTA ID : 205652 |Scopus ID :57204044908
(3) Institut Agama Islam Negeri Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
(4) Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v6i4.34360

Abstract


This research aimed to prove the role of production, attention, retention, motivation, and innovation in students’ scientific writing skills at the Islamic Study College (PTAI) in Cirebon. This experimental research used a quasi-experimental design and a nonequivalent control group design. The experiment was conducted in two groups, experiment and control groups. The research samples included Lecturers from a public Islamic University. The experiment group samples were 38 students of the Philosophy of Religion Department. The control group consisted of 33 Islamic Guidance and Counseling Department students. The collection technique used was tested, comprised of a pretest and posttest. The two groups were given the same tests (pretest and posttest), and the results were compared. The instrument used in this research was a test. Validity determination for the scientific writing ability variable was not measured statistically but through construct validity. The reliability test resulted in a reliability coefficient from an assessor of 0.82, while all assessors' average rating reliability coefficient was 0.93. The normality test results on scientific writing ability data with the control class show Lo = 0.106 < Lt = 0.154. Meanwhile, the normality test on the experiment class’s scientific writing ability data results in a maximum Lo of 0.106 and Lt = 0.144. The balance test results show the score of tcount = 1.51 < ttable = 1.67. The data analysis with t independent test resulted in the score of tcount > ttable (10.45 > 1.65). This shows that the competence of production, attention, retention, motivation, and innovation can improve students’ scientific writing skills.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahn, J. N., Hu, D., & Vega, M. (2020). “Do as I do, not as I say”: Using social learning theory to unpack the impact of role models on students’ outcomes in education. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12517

Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is Qualitative in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7

Asty, H., Kemal, E., Siska, Rahmat, W., & Doojin, S. (2021). Basic Mind Mapping on Mastering Listening Skills for Communication on Asean Economic Community (Aec) and 4.0 Era (Pemetaan Konsep Dasar Penguasaan Keahlian Menyimak Untuk Komunikasi Pada Masyarakat Ekonomi Asean Dan Era 4.0). Jurnal Gramatika: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 7(2), 322–334. https://doi.org/10.22202/jg.2021.v7i2.5225

Bair, M. A., & Mader, C. E. (2013). Academic Writing at the Graduate Level: Improving the Curriculum through Faculty Collaboration. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 10(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.10.1.4

Bandura, A. (2018). Toward a Psychology of Human Agency: Pathways and Reflections. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617699280

Borup, J., Chambers, C. B., & Stimson, R. (2019). K-12 student perceptions of online teacher and on-site facilitator support in supplemental online courses. Online Learning Journal, 23(4), 253–280. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i4.1565

Cesaria, A., Kemal, E., & Rahmat, W. (2022). Student Errors in Writing the English Mathematical Operation in Higher Education. Curricula : Journal of Teaching and Learning, 7(2), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.22216/curricula.v7i2.1366

Cottrell, S. (2017). Critical thinking skills: Effective analysis, argument and reflection (Vol. 59). Bloomsbury Publishing.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Research design : qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.

Delpa, D., & Afrinda, P. D. (2022). Student Speaking Actions in Understanding the Meaning of English Communication Homopons in the Lecture Room. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 2(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.51817/jpdr.v2i1.197

Eko, B., Cahyono, H., Mulyaningsih, I., Madiun, K., Perjuangan, J., Pass, B., & Kota, S. (2022). Learning Model Based on Creativity Development in Improving Literature Appreciation Ability (Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Pengembangan Kreativitas dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Apresiasi Sastra). Jurnal Gramatika: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 8(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22202/JG.2022.V8i1.5652

Faisol, Y., & Rahmat, W. (2021). Cyberactivism in Palestinian Conflict News Comments on Al-Jezeera Youtube Channel: a Cyberpragmatic Study (Aktivisme Siber Dalam Komentar Berita Konflik Palestina Di Kanal Youtube Al-Jazeera: Kajian Siberpragmatik). Jurnal Gramatika: Jurnal Penelitian PendidikanBahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 7(2), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.22202/jg.2021.v7i2.4954

Fatimah, N. (2019). Students’ Needs for Academic Writing at the English Education Department. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 1(3), 161. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v1i3.744

Harvey, P. D. (2019). Domains of cognition and their assessment. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 21(3), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2019.21.3/pharvey

Helda, T., Imelwaty, S., & Rahmat, W. (2020). Factors Affecting the Pre-service Student Teachers’ Performance in Implementing the Questioning Skills in their Microteaching Practices. Nuances of Indonesian Language, 1(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.51817/nila.v1i1.22

Iordanou, K., Kuhn, D., Matos, F., Shi, Y., & Hemberger, L. (2019). Article Learning by Arguing. Learning and Instruction, 63(Oktober). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.05.004

Kalliopi, K., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2019). Assessing computational thinking skills at first stages of schooling. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 135–139. https://doi.org/10.1145/3371647.3371651

Mart, T. (2012). Hakikat Seberkas Makalah Ilmiah. Koran Kompas Online.

Mulyaningsih, I., Nuryana, Z., Sylvia, I., Casmudi, & Haluti, F. (2019). Addressing the blockages of education and culture development. Test Engineering and Management, 81, 1102–1106.

Mulyaningsih, I., Suwandi, S., Setiawan, B., & Rohmadi, M. (2018). PARMI (Production, Attention, Retention, Motivation, and Innovation): An alternative to improving scientific writing skills. Lingua Cultura, 12(4), 317. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v12i4.4159

Munandar, U. (2012). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat [Developing the Creativity of Talented Children]. Rineka Cipta.

Nilesh, G. (2013). Hypotheses and its Testing. International Journal for Research in Education, 2(5), 1–6.

Pujo Leksono, R., & Tiawati, R. L. (2020). Thai Student Online Responses To Native Speaker Toward Indonesian Language Learning for Foreign Speakers Course (Respon Mahasiswa Thailand Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Bagi Penutur Asing (Bipa) Dengan Penutur Asli Secara Online). Jurnal Gramatika: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 6(2), 272–283. https://doi.org/10.22202/jg.2020.v6i2.4334

Rahmat, W. (2017). Sinisme dalam Kaba Sabai Nan Aluih Suatu Bentuk Pentingnya Bahasa Bahasa Ibu: Kajian Pragmatik. Curricula: Journal of Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 19–28. http://ejournal.kopertis10.or.id/index.php/curricula/article/view/1980

Revita, I., Asri, D., & Rahmat, W. (2019). Cooperative Learning as the Method to Stimulate and Motivate Students in Schools of Linguistics Class at English Department Andalas University. 139–142. https://doi.org/10.5220/0008681601390142

Rodrigues, A. P., Jorge, F. E., Pires, C. A., & António, P. (2019). The contribution of emotional intelligence and spirituality in understanding creativity and entrepreneurial intention of higher education students. Education and Training, 61(7–8), 870–894. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-01-2018-0026

Schunk, & Usher. (2012). Social cognitive theory and motivation. The Oxford handbook of human motivation (Vol. 49, Issue 11). Oxford University Press, Inc. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.49-6579

Suharni, Saidi, S. B., & Medina, S. (2022). Theo Van Leuwen’s Theory of Inclusion In Criminal News On Facebook: A Critical Discourse Analysis. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 2(2), 26–33. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.51817/jpdr.v2i2.205

Sultan, Rapi, M., Basri, M. B., & Suardi. (2022). Power Relations in Academic Discourse: a Critical Discourse Analysis of Lecturer-Student Interrogation During Undergraduate Thesis Defense Sessions (Relasi Kuasa Dalam Wacana Akademik: Studi Wacana Kritis Interogasi Dosen-Mahasiswa Pada Ujian Skripsi Prog. Jurnal Gramatika: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 8(2), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.22202/jg.2022.v8i2.6258

Tiawati, R. L., Rahmat, W., Kemal, E., & Chen, W. (2022). The Importance of Guidance In Understanding Cultural Discourse In Thinking and Speaking For Foreign Students In BIPA Program. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 2(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.51817/jpdr/v2i1.203

Woolfolk Hoy, A., Davis, H. A., & Anderman, E. M. (2013). Theories of Learning and Teaching in TIP. Theory into Practice, 52(SUPPL 1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2013.795437

Yendra, Y., Satria, W., Rahmat, W., Kemal, E., Kusumaningsih, D., Sudiyana, B., Miji Lestari, P., Susanti, R., Agung Ayu Dian Andriyani, A., Susylowati, E., Budi San-toso, A., Bambang Putut Setiyadi, D., Yulianti, W., Widhayani, A., Nur Kholidah, N., Saddhono, K., & PGRI Sumatera Barat, S. (2018). Introduction Blended Learning Designs on Introduction to Linguistics at West Indonesian. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7, 310–313. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.4.20121

Yusri, R., Muspardi, M., Kemal, E., & Rahmat, W. (2019). Effectiveness of national qualification framework Indonesia based curriculum and higher education national standard behaviour assesment rubric. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042129

Yusutria, & Rahmat, W. (2019). Foreign Language Examination Techniques (Case Study of Santri in Pondok Pesantren Harakatul Qur’an Padang Sumatera Barat). Curricula: Journal of Teaching and Learning, 4(3), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.22216/jcc.2019.v4i3.4496

Zuchdi, D. (2009). Humanisasi Pendidikan [Educational Humanization]. Bumi Aksara.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 854 times | PDF view : 196 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


License URL: https://creativecommons.org/

 

 

 

Creative Commons License


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.