Peer-learning in Young Learners English Speaking Tasks: An Ecological Analysis

Santi - Farmasari(1*),

(1) University of Mataram
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v6i3.32000

Abstract


The study examined English teachers’ agentive actions in a speaking assessment when utilizing students’ talks as model of responses to promote peer- learning. This instrumental case study views teacher agency on assessment from an ecological perspective, emphasizing the quality of teachers’ engagement in their environment. The study involved four primary English teachers teaching Year 5 and Year 6. The data were collected through classroom observations, audio-stimulated verbal recall interviews, and field notes. The data were analyzed thematically in nVivo12Pro software, where the themes were identified through the repetition of keywords. Co-coding, back-translation, and participant validation were employed to achieve the trustworthiness and reliability of the data. The study revealed that peer-learning was facilitated following the teachers’ understanding of their ecological contexts, i.e., the emerging problems during the assessment and the students’ assessment needs. The four teachers exercised their agentive actions by assigning the More-Proficient Students (MPS) to perform a speaking talk, from which the Less-Proficient Students (LPS) could learn, and utilized the MPS’ talks accordingly. The study findings strengthened the importance of teachers’ engagement with their ecological contexts when determining agentive actions. In addition, the study shows an interplay between theories of classroom-based assessment, teacher agency, and English for young language learners to promote peer-learning. This study has implications for relevant stakeholders about providing better supports for teachers exercising their agentive roles in facilitating students’ learning.


Keywords


model of responses, peer-learning, ecological perspective

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Issa, A. S. M. (2015). Making a case for new directions in English language teaching research at an Omani university: A critical qualitative content analysis report. Qualitative Report, 20(5), 560–595.

Astawa, I. N., Handayani, N. D., Nyoman, I. B., Mantra, & Wardana, I. K. (2017). Writing English Language Test Items as a Learning Device: A Principle of Habit Formation Rules. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(3), 135–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v1n3.67

Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of Human Agency Through Collective Efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75–78. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00064

Bender, D., & Raupach, M. P. (2010). Negotiating Standards and Social Justice in the Social Studies: Educators’ Perspectives. The Social Studies, 99(6). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3200/TSSS.99.6.255-259

Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and Learning in the Life Course: Towards an Ecological Perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/doi:/10.1080/02660830.2007.11661545

Biesta, Gert, Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2017). Talking about education: exploring the significance of teachers’ talk for teacher agency. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1205143

Burridge, N., & Chodkiewicz, A. (2010). Educating teachers about human rights: Building a right-based culture in Australian schools. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 45(5), 455–486. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2016.1201044

Charteris, J. (2015). Learner agency and assessment for learning in a regional New Zealand high school. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 25(2), 2–13.

Davidson, N., & Major, C. (2014). Boundary crossings: Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, & problem-based learning. Journal o f Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3–4), 7–55.

Dierking, R. C., & Fox, R. F. (2013). “Changing the Way I Teach”: Building teacher knowledge, confidence, and autonomy’. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112462893

Farmasari, S. (2020). Exploring teacher agency through English language school-based assessment: A case study in an Indonesian primary school [Queensland University of Technology]. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/205615/

Finch, A. (2012). Bringing classroom-based assessment into the EFL classroom. Applied Research in English, 1(1), 73–86. http://are.ui.ac.ir/article_15447_f5e8f4be252a1c2e762a57df8e3fa575.pdf.

Frost, D., & Durrant, J. (2002). Teachers as Leaders: Exploring the Impact of Teacher-led Development Work. School Leadership and Management, 22(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/doi:10.1080/1363243022000007728

Garbati, J. F., & Mady, C. J. (2015). Oral Skill Development in Second Languages: A Review in Search of Best Practices. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(9), 1763. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0509.01

Gibbons, P. (2007). Mediating academic language learning through classroom discourse. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 701–718). Springer.

Gifford-Smith, M. E Brownell, C. A. (2003). Childhood peer relationships: Social acceptance, friendships, and peer networks. Journal of School Psychology, 41(4), 235–284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(03)00048-7

Goddard, Y., Goddard, R., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2007). A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation of Teacher Collaboration for School Improvement and Student Achievement in Public Elementary Schools. Teachers College Record, 109(4), 877–896. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Megan_Tschannen-Moran/publication/242673601_A_Theoretical_and_Empirical_Investigation_of_Teacher_Collaboration_for_School_Improvement_and_Student_Achievement_in_Public_Elementary_Schools/links/56f09e5d08ae70bdd6c94f44/

Gu, L. (2015). Language ability of young English language learners: Definition, configuration, and implications. Language Testing, 32(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214542670

Hogan, D. M., & Tudge, J. R. H. (2009). Implications of Vyotsky’s theory o f peer learning. In M. Fleer, M. Hedegaard, & J. R. H. Tudge (Eds.), The world yearbook o f education (pp. 39–65). Cambridge University Press.

Horii, S. (2012). “Foreign language activities” in Japanese elementary schools: Negotiating teacher roles and identities within a new language education policy. [University of Minnesota]. http://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/144134/Horii_umn_0130E_13328.pdf

Lestari, Y. B. (2019). Teacher agency and localisation of English language teaching in Indonesia. The Asian EFL Journal 21 (2.4), 239-165, 21(2.4), 239–265. https://www.elejournals.com/asian-efl-journal/asian-efl-journal-volume-21-issue-2-4-march-2019/

Mckay, P. (2006). Assessing young language learners. Cambridge University Press.

Mlawski, E. A. (2021). View of Peer Learning in First Grade_ What Are Children Observed Doing_.pdf. Journal of Integrative and Innovative Humanities, 1(1), 5–20. http://ojs.human.cmu.ac.th/darshika/index.php/DJIIH/article/view/1/6

Priestley, M., Biesta, G. J. J., & Robinson, S. (2013). Teachers as Agents of Change: Teacher Agency and Emerging Models of Curriculum. In M. Priestley & G. J. J. Biesta (Eds.), Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice (pp. 187–206). Bloomsbury.

Priestley, M, Biesta, G. J. J., & Robinson, S. (2015). Priestley, M Biesta, G.J.J. Robinson, S. In R. Kneyber & J. Evers (Eds.), Flip the system: Education from the bottom up (pp. 134–148). Routledge.

Priestley, M, Biesta, G. J. J., & Robinson, S. (2016). Teacher Agency: An Ecological Approach. Bloomsbury. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/qut/detail.action?docID=2146745.

Priestley, Mark, & Biesta, G. (2014). Reinventing the Curriculum: New Trends in Curriculum Policy and Practice - Chapter 3 Capacities and the Curriculum. January, 36–47.

Rea-Dickins, P. (2007). Learning or measuring? Exploring teacher decision-making in planning for classroom-based assessment. In S. Fotos & N. Nassaji (Eds.), Formfocused instruction and teacher education (pp. 195–211). Oxford University Press.

Smagorinsky, P., Wilson, A. A., & Moore, C. (2011). Teaching grammar and writing: A beginning teacher’s dilemma. English Education, 43(3), 262–292. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23017093?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents

Soto-Hinman, I. (2011). Increasing Academic Oral Language Development: Using English Language Learner Shadowing in Classrooms. Multicultural Education, 18(2), 21–23. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ951841

Syarifudin. (2019). Compensatory communication strategies employed by EFL students in taking turns talking of a speaking class. The Asian EFL Journal, 6.2, 109–131. https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/tag/volume-23-issue-6-2-november-2019/

Topping, K.J., & Ehly, S. W. (2001). Pre-assisted learning: A framework for consultation. Journal of Education and Psychological Consultation, 12(2), 111–132.

Topping, Keith J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 631–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500345172

Weng, Z., Zhu, J., & Kim, G. J. Y. (2019). English language teacher agency in classroom-based empirical studies. TESOL International Journal, 14(1), 37–61. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1244103

Williams, W. R. (2018). Attempting arts integration: Secondary teachers’ experiences with spoken word poetry. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 13 (2), Pp. 92-105., 13(2), 92–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2018.1453817


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 947 times | PDF view : 169 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


License URL: https://creativecommons.org/

 

 

 

Creative Commons License


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.