Mr. Md. Azizul Haque(1*),

(1) Stamford University Bangladesh
(*) Corresponding Author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v1i1.2866


Despite the common diasporic origin English in Bangladesh is neither a native nor a second language, but a foreign language, in countries like India and Pakistan, English is used as the second language. The chronological history of English in Bangladesh has both political as well as social elements, which influence the learning of English at every level of education. In the mid-90s there was a growing demand from the educationists in the country to change the English curriculum as per ‘needs analysis’, and the curriculum is restructured aligning with the communication needs and the syllabus was largely transformed into a communicative one. Yet research explores that the needs are not served for the learners tend to by-pass the cognitive part of the language learning—thus failing to communicate properly. Now, in the second decade of the new millennium English curriculum along with other subjects has been made ‘creative’ at pre-tertiary level, but debates are still on to evaluate whether the system complies with the current practices prevailing within the institutional premises. The total picture thus presents a very confusing answer to the questions why all these efforts are being futile and why the English language teaching fails to touch the three main domains of learning—the cognitive, the affective and the psychomotor. The current study wants to explore whether such experiments with the curriculum and the dilemma of receiving or rejecting the idea of acculturation with largely an anti-colonial mindset hinder the desired performance of the language.


English language Diaspora; hit-and-miss experimentation; curriculum; Bangladesh

Full Text:



Aggarwal, J. (1983). Landmarks in the history of modern Indian education.Delhi: Vikas.

Bamgbose, A. (1998). Torn Between The Norms: Innovations in World Englishes, 17(01), 1-14.

Bolton, K. (2005). Where WE stands: approaches, issues & debates in World Englishes. World Englishes, 24(01), 69-83.

HO, D. G.E. (2008). English in the Expanding Circle – A third Diaspora?.Asian Englishes. 11(01), 36-50.

Jenkins, J. and Seidlhofer, B. (2001). Bringing Europe’s lingua franca into the classroom in Pulverness, A. (ed.): IATEFL 2001 Brighton Conference Selections (pp. 87-90). Whitstable: IATEFL.

Johnson, D. (2005). Teaching culture in adult ESL: pedagogical & ethical considerations. TESL-EJ, 9(01), 1-9.

Kachru, B. (1985). “Standards, codification & sociolinguistic realism: the English language in the outer circle” in Quirk, R.& H.G. Widdowson (eds.): English in the World (pp. 11-30).

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Karim, K. M. R. (2004). Teachers' perceptions, attitudes and expectations about Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in post-secondary education in Bangladesh (A Thesis for the Degree of Master of Arts, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Victoria). Retrieved from https://dspace.library.uvic.ca/bitstream/handle/1828/560/karim_2004.pdf?sequence=1.

McArthur, T. (ed.). (1996). The Oxford companion to the English language

(abridged edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

McKay, S. (2006). EIL curriculum development. In R. Rubdy & M. Saraceni (Eds.), English in the world: Global rules, global roles (pp. 114-129). London, UK: Continuum.

National Curriculum and Text Books Board (2006).Teaching English. Dhaka: Teaching Quality Improvement in Secondary Education Project.

Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Quader, D.A. (2003). Teacher Training for Teachers of English. Journal of the Institute of Modern Language. Dhaka: Dhaka University Press.

Quirk, R. (1986, 1990). Words at work: lectures on textual structure. Singapore: NUS Press.

Richards, J. C & Rodgers T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. (2nd Ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Seidlhofer, B. & Jenkins, J. (2003). English as a lingua franca & the politics of property. In C. Mair (Ed.), The politics of English as a world language: New horizons in post colonial cultural studie (pp.139-154). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Seidlhofer, B. (2001). Closing a conceptual gap: the case for a description of English as a lingua franca. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(02), 135- 158.

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 819 times | PDF view : 198 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.