Exploring TESOL Teachers’ Perceptions of Project-Based Assessment in ELT Classroom

Navisatul Izzah(1*),

(1) UPN Veteran Jawa Timur
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v5i2.16284

Abstract


This study explored the perceptions of TESOL teachers in Indonesia regarding the use of project-based assessment in their classrooms. As assessment has undergone massive development and shifting paradigms, there has been recognition for teachers to reconceptualise their assessment practice. There have been attempts made by some countries, including Indonesia, to introduce various assessment methods including project-based assessment. Since it has been introduced in Indonesia in 2016 through government document, little is known about TESOL teachers’ use of this assessment method. Furthermore, project-based assessment has mostly been used in science classroom, but not in ELT classroom. Research study regarding the use of project-based assessment in ELT classroom and how TESOL teachers in Indonesia perceive the use of project-based assessment would therefore be valuable additions to the field. This study used a qualitative case study as its methodology to gain an in-depth understanding of the emerging issue. Four ELT teachers around Surabaya were interviewed about their project-based assessment practice. The findings of this study revealed that teachers highly value the use of project-based assessment in their classroom despite the challenges they encounter. Hence, some implications and directions for further studies are also provided.

Keywords: assessment method, classroom assessment, TESOL Teachers, project-based assessment, ELT in Indonesia.



Keywords


assessment method, classroom assessment, TESOL Teachers, project-based assessment, ELT in Indonesia

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bailey, K. M. (1998). Learning about language assessment: Dilemmas, decisions, and directions. Pacific Grove, CA: Heinle & Heinle.

Balliro, L. (1993) What kind of alternative? Examining alternative assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 27(3), 558-561. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587490

Barootchi, N., and Keshavarz, M. H. (2002). Assessment of achievement through portfolios and teacher-made tests. Educational Research,44(3), 279-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880210135313

Black, P. (1998). Testing: Friend or Foe? Theory and Practice of Assessment and Testing. USA: Falmer Press.

Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Educational Assessment: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7–74. Retrieved from https://www.gla.ac.uk/t4/learningandteaching/files/PGCTHE/BlackandWiliam1998.pdf

Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148. Retrieved from https://www.rdc.udel.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/InsideBlackBox.pdf

Bell, B. F., & Cowie, B. M. (1997). Formative assessment and science education: Research report of the learning in science project (Assessment). Hamilton: University of Waikato.

Brown, J. D. (1998). New ways of classroom assessment. USA: TESOL, Inc.

Brown, H. D. (2003). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practice. San Francisco, California: Longman.

Brown, G. T. L. (2004) Teachers' conceptions of assessment: implications for policy and professional development. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(3), 301-318. DOI: 10.1080/0969594042000304609

Brown, G. T. L., & Hirschfeld, G. H. F. (2005). Secondary school students’ conceptions of assessment. Conceptions of Assessment and Feedback

Project. Auckland, NZ: University of Auckland.

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (Fifth ed.). UK: Oxford University Press.

Butterfield, S., Williams, A. & Marr, A. (1999). Talking about assessment: mentor-student dialogues about pupil assessment in initial teacher training. Assessment in Education, 6(2), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695949992883

Cheng, L., Rogers, W. T., & Wang, X. (2008). Assessment purposes and procedures in ESL/EFL classrooms. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(1), 9-32. DOI: 10.1080/02602930601122555

Cirit, N. C. (2015). Assessing ELT pre-service teachers via web 2.0 tools: Perceptions toward traditional, online and alternative assessment. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3), 9-19. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/161464/

Crooks, T. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 438–481. DOI: 10.2307/1170281

Dewey, J. (1960). On experience, nature and freedom: Representative selections. R. J. Bernstein (Ed.). Indianapolis, IND: The Bobbs-Merrill Company.

Dewey, J. (1973). The philosophy of John Dewey. New York, NY: Putnam’s Sons.

Dwyer, C.A. (2008). The future of assessment. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.

Dyson, A.H., & Genishi, C. (2005). On the case: Approaches to language and literacy research. New York: Teachers College Press.

Filer, A. (1995). Teacher assessment: Social process and social product. Assessment in Education, 2(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594950020103

Firestone, W. A., Mayrowetz, D. & Fairman, J. (1998). Performance-based assessment and instructional change: the effects of testing in Maine and Maryland. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20(2), 95–113. DOI: 10.2307/1164376

Gipps, C. V. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. London: Falmer Press.

Herman, J. L., Aschbacher, P. R., and Winters, L. (1992) A practical

guide to alternative assessment. Alexandria, VA.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Inbar‐Lourie, O., & Donitsa‐Schmidt, S. (2009). Exploring classroom

assessment practices: The case of teachers of English as a foreign language. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(2), 185-204. DOI: 10.1080/09695940903075958

Krajcik, J., McNeill, K. L., & Reiser, B. J. (2008). Learning-goals-driven design model: developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project-based pedagogy. Science Education, 92(10), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20240

Manouchehri, A., & Goodman, T. (2000). Implementing mathematics reform: The challenge within. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42(1), 1–34. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/3483274

Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Mayrath, C.M., Clarke-Midura, J., Robinson, D.H., & Schraw, G. (2011). Technology-based assessments for 21st century skills. USA: Information Age Publishing.

McMillan, J.H. (2003). Understanding and improving teachers’ classroom assessment decision making:

implications for theory and practice. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2003.tb00142.x

Mehrens, W. A. & Lehmann, I. J. (1984). Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology. New York, Holt: Rinehart and Winston.

Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Ministry of Education and Culture. (2016). Assessment Guidelines. Jakarta: Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture.

Moreland, J. P. (1998). Technology education teacher development: The importance of experiences in technological practice. Unpublished M.Ed Thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.

Moreland, J. P., & Jones, A. (2000). Emerging assessment practices in an emergent curriculum: Implications for technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 283–305. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1008990307060

Ortega, D. P., & Minchalla, O. E. (2017). Assessing students in an authentic and ongoing manner in the English classroom. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(3), 159-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0703.01

Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers beliefs and educational-research – Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307

Pathak, A., & Intratat, C. (2012). Use of semi-structured interviews to investigate teacher perceptions of student collaboration. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 8(1), 1-12. Retrieved from https://journals.melta.org.my/index.php/majer/article/view/149/64

Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Peterson, E. R. and Irving, S.E. (2008). Secondary school students’ conceptions of assessment and feedback. Learning and Instruction, 18(1), 238-250. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.05.001

Popham, W. J. (2008). Classroom Assessment: What teachers need to know. Boston: Pearson.

Shome, S., & Natarajan, C. (2013). Ideas of and attitudes towards projects and changing practices: Voices of four teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(10). http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2013v38n10.5

Smith, M. L., Heinecke, W. & Noble, A. J. (1999). Assessment policy and political spectacle. Teachers College Record, 101(2), 157–191.

Stiggins, R. (2001). The unfilled promise of classroom assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20, 5-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2001.tb00065.x

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Torrance, H. and Pryor, J. (1995). Investigating teacher assessment in infant classrooms: Methodological problems and emerging issues. Assessment in Education, 2(3), 305–320.

Williams, S. (2017). Investigating the allocation and corroboration of individual grades for project-based learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53(1), 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.10.009

Yin, R. (2003). Applications of case study research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Yin, R. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (Fifth ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 503 times | PDF view : 105 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


License URL: https://creativecommons.org/

 

 

 

Creative Commons License


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.