The Effect of Authentic Materials on Writing Performance across Different Levels of Proficiency

Sony - Sukmawan(1*), Lestari - Setyowati(2), Ana Ahsana El-Sulukiyyah(3),

(1) Faculty of Cultural Studies, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Letters, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
(3) English Education Study Program, Faculty of Pedagogy and Psychology, University of PGRI Wiranegara
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v5i1.15286

Abstract


The use of authentic materials for language teaching is common. Yet, there is not much information about what type of instructional materials benefits learners. The purpose of the study is to find empirical evidence of whether non–fiction authentic materials are more superior that fiction authentic material. The researchers used an experimental design to answer the research question. The population of the study was all students who took an essay writing course at University PGRI Wiranegara in the academic year 2019-2020. The sample was taken by using a systematic random sampling method which results in two equal numbers of students in two experimental groups. Group A was taught with non-fiction authentic material, while group B was taught with the fiction authentic material. The researchers used ANOVA to analyze the data in SPSS 22. The process of teaching and learning followed the writing as a process approach and was done in a blended-learning setting because of the pandemic of COVID 19. The result shows that there is no significant interaction between content type and proficiency level (F(2,30) = 1.347, p = .275). The main effect of content type on writing performance was not significant (F(1,30)=.001, p .973), but the main effect of proficiency level on writing performance is significant such that the students who have a higher level of writing proficiency have better performance than the students who have a lower level of writing proficiency  ((2,30) = 5.653, .008). The researchers conclude that both types of authentic materials are equally effective to improve the students’ essay writing performance.


Keywords


authentic, essay , fiction, materials, non-fiction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al Azri, R.H., & Al-Rashdi, M.H. 2014. The Effect Of Using Authentic Materials In Teaching. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research. 3 : 249-254

Alomrani, A. H. (2014). Integrating Reading Into Writing Instruction in the EFL Programs at Saudi Universities. Arab World English Journal, 5 (3), 100–112. Retrieved from www.awej.org

Appley, B.K. 1988. The effectiveness of Fiction and Non Fiction in Teaching Reading to ESL Students. Master Thesis. Portland University. Diakses dari https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4764&context=open_access_etds .

Arifa, Z. 2011. The Effects of Authentic Materials on Students’ Writing of Procedural Text. Journal on English as a Foreign Language (JEFL), 1(2): 95-102

Aqly, M., Komariah, E., & Heriansyah, H. 2017. The Use of Authentic Materials in Developing Students’ Writing Competence (An Experimental Study at SMA Labschool Unsyiah). English Education Journal. 2: 61-69

Baniabdelrahman, A. A. 2006. ̳The Effect of Using Authentic English Language Materials on EFL Students‘ Achievement in Reading Comprehension‘, Journal of Education and Psychological Sciences, 7 (1) 8-21

Chamba, M., Reinoso, M., & Rengifo, E. 2019. Authentic Materials to Foster Writing Skills in College EFL Learners. English Language Teaching; Vol. 12, No. 6: 112-127

Crossley, S.A., Louwerse, M.M., McCarthy, P.M., & McNamara, D. 2007, A Linguistic Analysis of Simplified and Authentic Texts. Modern Language Journal. 91 (1), 15-30

El-Sulukiyyah, A., & Aisyah, R. 2019. Teaching Essay Writing UsingAuthentic Materials to ImproveStudents' Writing Performance. Journal of English Education Society (JEES). 4 (2): 79-87

Fabusuyi, A. A. (2014). Integrating Folktales in the Teaching of German –A Practical Approach. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4: 11(1): 246-251

Ghanbari, N., Esmaili,F., & Shamsaddini, M. R. 2015. The Effect of Using Authentic Materials on Iranian EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5 (12): 2459-2468

Hatimah, R, H, Rofiq, A, & Andayani T, M, A. (2013). The Effect of Using Authentic Materials On Tenth Grade Students’ Reading Comprehension Achievement at MA Islamiyah Syafi’iyah Sumberanyar-Paiton in the 2012-2013 Academic Year, Pancaran, 2(3), 35-44

Hartung, F., Withers, P., Hagoort, P., & Willems, R. M. (2017). When Fiction Is Just as Real as Fact: No Differences in Reading Behavior between Stories Believed to be Based on True or Fictional Events. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1618. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01618

Hiebert, E. H., & Cervetti. G. N. 2011. What Differences in Narrative and Informational Texts Mean for the Learning and Instruction of Vocabulary. California: Text Project. Retrieved from http://sites.bu.edu/summerliteracyinstitute/files/2015/04/HiebertE-What-differences-in-narrative.pdf

Hintze J.L. 2011. PASS Quick Start Manual. Kaysville, Utah: NCSS. Retrieved from https://ncss-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/PASS11QuickStart.pdf

Laerd Statistics. 2018. One-way ANOVA in SPSS Statistics. Retrieved from https://statistics.laerd.com/spss-tutorials/one-way-anova-using-spss-statistics.php

Martin, S. 2012. Effective Comprehension Strategies After Initial Reading of Fiction and Nonfiction Texts. Education Master. Retrieved from https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1208&context=education_ETD_masters

Nurrohmah, I., Suparman, U., & Sukirlan, M. 2015. "Comparing Literary and Non-literary Texts Through Critical Reading Approach on Reading Comprehension." UNILA Journal of English Teaching, 4 (1), 1-15.

Otte, J. 2006. Real Language To Real People: A Descriptive And Exploratory Case Study Of The Outcomes Of Aural Authentic Texts On The Listening Comprehension Of Adult ESL Students Enrolled In An Advanced ESL Listening Course. Dissertation Abstracts International.. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9404290

Styati, E. W. (2016). Effect of YouTube Videos and Pictures on EFL Students’ Writing Performance. DINAMIKA ILMU. 16 (2): 307-317 https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v16i2.534

Sukmawan, S., Setyowati, L., Nurmansyah, A. (2015). Mendayagunakan Genre Sastra Flash Fiction untukMenulisTeksArgumentasi. JurnalIlmiahEdukasidanSosial,6 (1), 84-95

Setyowati, L.& Sukmawan, S. 2019. Authentic Materials for Teaching Writing: A Critical Look. International Journal of Language Education, 3 (2), 68-77

Setyowati, L. (2016). Analyzing the Students' Ability in Writing Opinion Essay using Flash Fiction. JELTL, 1 (1): 71-91

Setyowati, L., & Sukmawan, S. 2018. Writing for Comprehension in Prose Fiction Analysis: The students’ Voices, AWEJ, 9 (1): 134-145

Sundana, G. P. (2017). The Use Of Authentic Material In Teaching Writing Descriptive Text. English Review: Journal of English Education, 6 (1), 81-88. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v6i1.773

Suresh, K., & Chandrashekara, S. (2012). Sample size estimation and power analysis for clinical research studies. Journal of human reproductive sciences, 5(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.97779 (Retraction published J Hum Reprod Sci. 2015 Jul-Sep;8(3):186)

Takahashi, K. (2015). Literary Texts as Authentic Materials for Language Learning: The Current Situation in Japan. In Literature and Language Learning in the EFL Classroom (pp. 26–40). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137443663

Topping, Keith J. 2015. Fiction and Non-Fiction Reading and Comprehension in Preferred Books. Reading Psychology, 36 (4), 350-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2013.865692

Ward, N., Schell, R., Brown, C.L., & Thomason, B. (2019). Pairing Fiction and Nonfiction Texts to Promote Literacy and Language Development of Adolescent English Learners. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 92, 193 - 201. DOI:10.1080/00098655.2019.1649631


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 603 times | PDF view : 99 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


License URL: https://creativecommons.org/

 

 

 

Creative Commons License


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.