Teachers’ Perceptions about the Use of Authentic Material in Pakistani EFL Classrooms

Atiya Rehman(1), Ayesha Perveen(2*),

(1) University of Lahore
(2) Virtual University of Pakistan
(*) Corresponding Author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v5i2.15241


This study explores the perceptions of teachers about the use of Authentic Material in Pakistani secondary school English language teaching classrooms. The research was descriptive in nature and used a quantitative approach to collect data through a survey questionnaire from 40 Pakistani Secondary school English language teachers. The questionnaire used was initially adapted from a research done in Hong Kong by Yeung Ting-fai in 2011, under the topic “English language teachers' attitudes towards the use of authentic materials in Hong Kong secondary schools” but then modified to a larger extent according to the scenario and situation of the Pakistani education system. The data was analyzed through SPSS and descriptive statistics were obtained. The results of this research are significant in Pakistani context. Although many teachers wanted to use Authentic Material in their classes, they were hesitant to do so due to the constraints related to curriculum, examination system and administrative pressure. The study recommends adapting curriculum and examination systems to provide administrative support that can provide space to Pakistani secondary school teachers for using Authentic Material in English language classrooms.


perception, authentic material, teachers, English language, Pakistani Secondary school

Full Text:




ACARA (Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority). (2011). The shape of the Australian Curriculum., Version 3. Sydney: Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority.

Asghar, J. (2013). Change for the better: an evaluative study of a textbook. Language,

Individual and society., 7(1), 404 – 422.

Asghar, J., and Al-Bargi, A. (2014). Teaching of Critical Reading Skills in ESL and EFL

Context: A Proposal for Action Researchers. Arab World English Journal., 5(1), 180-196.

Atkinson, R. C. & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes, the psychology of learning and motivation. Advances in research and theory., (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). New York: Academic Press, Inc.

Bacon, S. M. and Finnemann, M. D. (1990). A study of the attitudes, motives, and strategies of University foreign students. Modern Language Journal., 74-459-473.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Barab, S. A., Gresalfi, M. & Arici, A. (2009). Why educators should care about games. Educational Leadership., 67(1), 76–80.

Bell, F. L. (2005). Comprehension aids, internet technologies, and the reading of authentic materials by adult second language learners. PhD dissertation., The Florida State University.

Bennett, S., Maton, K. & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology., 39(5), 775–86.

Berardo, S. A. (2006). The use of authentic materials in the teaching of reading. The reading matrix 6(2)., Pp 60-69.

Berardo, S. A. (2006). The use of authentic materials in the teaching of reading. The reading matrix 6(2). Pp 60-69.

Black, P. & WILIAM, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning, Assessment in Education., 5 (1), March, 7-74.

Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. 80(2):139-148. http://www.pdkintl.org/kappan/kbla9810.htm.

Blackwell, G. & Chalifour, F. (2012). Tech class. Professionally Speaking: The Magazine of the Ontario College of Teachers. March, pp. 35–9.

Bloom, B.S. (1994). Reflections on the development and use of the taxonomy. Yearbook: National Society for the Study of Education., 92(2), 1–8.

Breen, M.P. (1985). Authenticity in the language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 6, 60–70.

Broussard, S. C., & Garrison, M. E. B. (2004). The relationship between classroom motivation and academic achievement in elementary school-aged children. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal., 33(2), 106–120.

Burns, A. (2001). Analysing spoken discourse: Implications for TESOL in Burns, A. and Coffin (eds.) Analysing English in a Global context: A Reader. London: Routledge, 123- 148. Web. Ba.

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.

Chen, Y. L., Liu, E. Z. F., Shih, R. C., Wu, C. T. & Yuan, S. M. (2011). Use of peer feedback to enhance elementary students’ writing through blogging. British Journal of Educational Technology., 42, E1–E4.

Cheung, C. (2001). The use of popular culture as a stimulus to motivate secondary students' English learning in Hong Kong. ELT Journal., 55(1), 55-61.

Chomsky. (1965). some controversial qustions in phonological theory. Journal of linguistics. 68-69.

Crossley, S.A., Louwerse, M.M, McCarthy, P.M., & McNamara, D.S. (2007). A linguistic analysis of simplified and authentic texts. The Modern Language Journal, 91(1), 15-30.

Cooper, M. (1983). The Role of the Teacher Specialistin the New York City Teacher Center. Urban Educator, 7(1), 49.

Cuban, L. (2003). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Davies, A. (1984). ESL expectations in examining: the problem of English as a Foreign Language and English as a Mother Tongue. Language Testing, 1(1), 82-95.

DeVellis Robert, F. (2003). Scale development: theory and applications.

Dr. Carla C. Johnson. (2006). Effective professional development and change in practice; barriers science teachers encounter and implications for reform. School Science and Mathematics., 106 (3): 150-161.

Ellis, R. (1990). Instructed Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Genhard, J., G. (1996). Teaching English as a foreign language: A teacher self-development and methodology. Ann arbor: the university of Michigan press.

Gilmore, A. (2007). Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 40, 97-118.

Gilsone, A. (2004). A comparison of textbook and authentic interactions. ELT Journal., 58(4). Pp 363-374.

Graham, S., and Harris, K. R. (2005). Improving the writing performance of young struggling writers: Theoretical and programmatic research from the Center on Accelerating Student Learning. Journal of Special Education., 39, 19-33.

Grenfell, M. and Harris, V. (1999). Modern Languages and Language Learning Strategies: In Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.

Guariento, W. and J. Morely. (2001). Text and task authenticity in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal., 55 (4), 347-353.

Haley. H. and Austin, T.Y. (2004). Content-based second language teaching and learning. USA: Pearson education.

Harmer, J. (1991). The Practical of English Language Teaching.

Harlen, Wynne and James. Mary (1997). Assessment and Learning: differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice., 4 (3): 365–379.

Baird, T. (2000). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hennery sweet. (1890). An Icelandic primer, with grammer, notes and glossary. Oxford., clarendron press. 71;73.

Hennery sweet. (1899). The practical study of langage; a guide for teachers and learners. Oxford university press., 99;145.

Hew, K. F. & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K–12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research & Development, 55(3), 223–52.

Horwitz, E. K. (2008). Becoming a language teacher: a practical guide to second language learning and teaching. Boston: Pearson Education.

Hussain, S.S. (1999). Curriculum and Instruction. Rehbar Publishers, Karachi.

Morgan, C.T. (1986). Introduction to Psychology. McGraw-Hill Book Company,

New York. Pp 247-258.

Hyland, K. (2003). Writing and teaching writing. Second language writing, 1-30.

Hymes. (1972). The practice of English language teaching. London. 2nd edition.

Jackson, P. W. (1986). The Practice of Teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.

Jones. (2005). Assessment for Learning, Learning and Skills Development Agency (now the Learning and Skills Network)., p.1.

Jordan, R. (1997). English for Academic Purposes: A Guide and Resource for Teachers. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.

Jordan, R.R. (1997). English for academic purposes: A guide and resource for teachers.

Kilickaya, F. (2004). Authentic materials and culture content in EFL classrooms. The Internet ELT Journal., 10(7).

Kilickaya. F. (2004). Authentic materials and cultural content in EFL classrooms. The Internet TESL Journal., 10 (7). Retrieved: http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Kilickaya AutenticMaterial.html.

Kodotchigova, M. A. (2002). Role play in teaching culture: Six quick steps for classroom implementation. The Internet TESL Journal., 8(7).

Kwo,O. (2004). Uncovering the inner power of teachers’ lives: towards a learning profession. International Journal of Educational Research., 41,281-291.

Larimer, R. E., and L. Schleicher. (1999). New ways in using authentic materials in the classroom. Alexandria, Virginia: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc.

Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

Lazerson, M., J. B. McLaughlin, B. McPherson, and K. Bailey. (1985). An Education of Value: The Purposes and Practices of Schools. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lee, W. (1995). Authenticity revisited: Text authenticity and learner authenticity. ELT Journal., 49(4), 323–328.

Leyden, M. B. (1984). You graduate more criminals than scientists. Sci. Teach. 51:27-30.

Linder, D. (1999). Authentic texts in ESL/EFL. TESOL Matters, 9(6), 17.

MacDonald, M. N., Badger, R., & Dasli, M. (2006). Authenticity, culture and language learning. Language and intercultural communication, 6(3-4), 250-261.

Maher Salah, Sh. (2008). The relationship between vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension of authentic Arabic texts. Unpublished MA thesis., Brigham Young University.

Matthews, B., & Ross, L. (2010). Knowledge, theories, paradigms and perspectives. Research methods: A practical guide for the social sciences, 16-41.

Martinez, A.G. (2002). Authentic Materials: An Overview on Karen's Linguistic Issues. Retrieved., January 16, 2015.

Martinez, A.G. (2002). Authentic materials: An overview. Free resources for teachers and students of English. Karen's Linguistics Issues., 1-7.

Marchese, T. J. (1987). Assessment Update. Third Down, Ten Years to Go. AAHE bulletin, 40(4), 3-8.

Marzano, R. J. (2006). Classroom assessments and grading that work. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Masey Garrison. (2001). Oral language development in ESL. University of Toronto.

Mayer, R. E. (2008). Applying the science of learning: Evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. American Psychologist., 63(8), 760–9.

McDonough, J. and Shaw, CH. (2003). Materials and methods in ELT. UK: Blackwell Publishing.

MCEETYA. (2008). (Ministerial Council on Education Employment Training and Youth Affairs) Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians. Melbourne:

McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh University Press.

McKay, S. L. (2000). Teaching English as an international language: Implications for cultural materials in the classroom. TESOL Journal., 9(4), 7-11.

McNeill, A. (1994). What Makes Authentic Materials Different? The Case of English Language Materials for Educational Television. Papers presented at the Annual International Language in Education Conference., Hong Kong.

Methew and lizz Ross. (2010). Research methods; a practical guide for social sciences. University of Nottingham. 14(1), 1-7.

Miller, M. (2005). Improving aural comprehension skills in EFL, using authentic materials: an experiment with university students in Niigata, Japan., Unpublished master ‘s thesis, University of Surrey, Australia.

Mishan, F. (2005). Designing Authenticity into Language Learning Materials. Bristol: Intellect.

Morrow, K. (1977). Authentic texts in ESP. In Holden, S.(Ed). English for specific purposes. London: Modern language publications.

Mueller, J., Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Ross, C. and Specht, J. (2008). Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Computers and Education., 51(4), 1523–37.

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nation, I. S. P. (2002). Managing Vocabulary Learning. Singapore: Seameo Regional Language Center.

Nation, I., S., P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.

Nawab Ali. (2012). Is it the way to teach language the way we teach language? English language teaching in rural Pakistan. Academic Research International 2:2., 700.

Nayyar, A. H. and Salim, A. (2007). The Subtle Subversion: the State of Curricula and

Textbooks in Pakistan.

Nunan, D. (1988). The learner-centered curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching and Learning. Boston: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.

Nuttall, C. (1996). Teaching Reading Skills in a foreign language (New Edition). Oxford, Oxford University Press.

OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2010). Are the new millennium learners making the grade? Technology use and educational performance in PISA: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation., OECD.

Otte, J. (2006). Real language to real people: a descriptive and exploratory case study of the outcomes of aural authentic texts on the listening comprehension of adult ESL students enrolled in an advanced ESL listening course. Dissertation Abstracts


Paltridge, B. (2001). Genre and the language learning classroom., Michigan: University of Michigan.

Peacock, M. (1997). The Effect of Authentic Materials on the Motivation of EFL Learners in English. Language Teaching Journal 51., pp 2.

Phillips, M., & Shettlesworth, C. (1978). In English for Specific Purposes. ELT Documents.(EzuC Document Reproduction Service No F. Dr76542).

Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Ernst Klett Sprachen.

Richardson, W. (2006). Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful web tools for classroom. Thousand Oaks., CA: Corwin Press.

Rod Ellis. (1993). Talking shop: Second language acquisition research: How does it help teachers. English Language Teaching Journal, 47:1, (1993):3-11

Rogers, C., and Medley, F., Jr. (1988). Language with a purpose: using authentic materials in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals., 21, 467–478.

Ronald Carter and Michael McCarthy. (1995). Spoken Grammar: What it is and How Can We Teach It?” English Language Teaching Journal., 49:3, (1995): 207-218.

Sadler, D.R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems.

Instructional Science., 18 (2): 119-144.

Saunders, M., Lewis, and Thornhill. (2003). Research and business students. New York., Prentice hall.

Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in Language Teaching. New

York: Cambridge University Press.

Schmitt, N. and Schmitt, D. (1995). Vocabulary Notebooks: Theoretical Underpinnings and Practical Suggestions. ELT Journal., 49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/49.2.133.

Shanahan, D. (1997). Articulating the relationship between language, literature and culture: Toward a new agenda for foreign language teaching and research. The Modern Language Journal., 81(2), 164-174.

Shepard and Lorrie A. (2005). Formative assessment: Caveat emptor (PDF). ETS Invitational Conference. The Future of Assessment: Shaping Teaching and Learning., New York, Retrieved 25 August 2011.

Shepard, L. (2005). Formative assessment: caveat emptor. ETS Invitational Conference., The Future of Assessment: Shaping Teaching and Learning, New York.

Shrum, J. L. and Glisan, E. W. (2000). Teacher’s handbook: contextualized language instruction. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Spelleri, M. (2002). From Lessons to Life: Authentic Materials Bridge the Gap. ESL Magazine, 5(2), 16-18.

Stahl, S.A., and Nagy, W. (2006). Teaching word meanings.

Stuart. G., and Nocon, H. (1996). Second culture acquisition: Authenticity, culture and language learning. Language and Intercultural Communication., Vol. 6, No. 3&4. Pp 250-26.

Su, Sh. (2007). Attitudes of students and instructors toward textbook-based language skills and authentic materials in selected adult English as a second language programs. PhD thesis., Spalding University.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12,257–85.

Tatsuki, D. (2006). What is authenticity? The language teacher. 16(5). Pp 17-21.

Taylor, D. (1994). Inauthentic authenticity or authentic authenticity? TESL-EJ., 1(2). Retrieved January 10, 2015 from http://www-writing.berkeley.edu/TESL-EJ/ej02/a.1.html

Thanajaro, M. (2000). Using authentic materials to develop listening comprehension in the English as a foreign language classroom. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.

Tseng, Y. (2002). A lesson in culture. ELT Journal., 56(1), 11-21.

Velancia. (2000). The Use of Authentic Texts in the K-12 Spanish Program. In McCoy, L. P. (Ed), Studies in Teaching 2007 Research Digest. Research Projects Presented at Annual Research Forum. NC, Winston-Salem., Pp 133-138.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Warsi, J. (2004). Conditions under which English is taught in Pakistan: An applied linguistic perspective. Sarid Journal, 1(1), 1-9.

Warschauer, M. (2010). Invited commentary: New tools for teaching writing. Language,Learning and Technology., 14(1), 3–8.

Widdowson, H. (1990). Aspects of Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Widdowson, H. (1996). Comment: Authenticity and autonomy in ELT. ELT University of Michigan Press.

Widdowson, H.G. (1983). Learning Purpose and Language Use Oxford. O.U.P.

Wong. (2010). Mainland Chinese Students’ English Language Learning Style Preferences at a Community College in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong.

Yeung, T. F. (2011). English language teachers' attitudes towards the use of authentic materials in Hong Kong secondary schools.

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 828 times | PDF view : 146 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/




Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.