The Role of Technology in ELL Classes in Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus

Sami Hussein Hakeem Barzani(1*), Muhammad Zammad Aslam(2), Talha Aslam(3),

(1) Cyprus International University, TRNC
(2) Universiti Utara Malaysia
(3) Bahria University Islamabad Pakistan
(*) Corresponding Author



In the contemporary English language classroom, technology keeps an important role to support language learning. The present research focuses only on the tools, i.e., Smart Boards, tablets/laptops, and LMS (online learning management system), which English language teachers utilize in their class at the level of English Preparatory School, BS and Master in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). Moreover, the present qualitative and observational research examines the role of technology, which is utilized at the English Preparatory School in Cyprus International University to teach English to the learners who learn English as a Second Language. For the present research, the researchers collect the data through 2 interviews of the teachers who teach at Cyprus International University (CIU) and from an in-depth literature review. Through the findings of the present research, the researchers observe that: a) all the teachers in TRNC utilize technology, i.e., Smart Boards, tablets and LMS during the teaching of English language and English subjects, i.e., Multimedia (only for PowerPoint presentations); b) in TRNC, the technology helps the English Language Learners (ELLs) to enhance their language skills and make them independent language learners; c) in TRNC, teachers, and students who utilize technology in language learning process face technical challenges due to lack of knowledge or less familiarity with the technology. Hence, the present research would explore the pros and cons of technology and intends the knowledge of a teacher who would take an interest in teaching language through technology.


language teaching & technology; English as a second language; English language classrooms; English as a second language in TRNC; technology in language learning/teaching

Full Text:



Ahmadi, D. (2018). The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review. International Journal of Research in English Education, 3(2). 115-125

Ahmadi, M. R. (2017). The impact of motivation on reading comprehension. International Journal of Research in English Education. Retrieved on March 4 2020 from

Alsaleem, B. I. A. (2014). The effect of “WhatsApp” electronic dialogue journaling on improving writing vocabulary word choice and voice of EFL undergraduate Saudi Students. Harvard: 21st Century Academic Forum Conference Proceedings.

Arifah, A. (2014). Study on the use of technology in ELT classroom: Teachers’ perspective. M.A. thesis, Department of English and Humanities, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Baytak, A., Tarman, B., & Ayas, C. (2011). Experiencing technology integration in education: children’s perceptions. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 3(2), 139-151. Retrieved on March 17 2020 from

Becker, H. J. (2000). Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey: Is Larry Cuban right? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(51). DOI:

Bennett, D., Culp, K. M., Honey, M., Tally, B., & Spielvogel, B. (2000). It all depends: Strategies for designing technologies for educational change. Paper presented at the International Conference on Learning Technology, Philadelphia, PA.

Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–86.

Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

Bull, S., & Ma, Y. (2001) Raising learner awareness of language learning strategies in situations of limited recourses. Interactive Learning Environments, 9(2), 171-200. DOI: 10.1076/ilee.

Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2003). Strip mining for gold; research and policy in educational technology-a response to fool’s gold. Educational Technology Review, 11(1), 7-69.

Costley, K. C. (2014). The positive effects of technology on teaching and student learning. Arkansas Tech University.

Dawson, K., Cavanaugh, C., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2008). Florida’s EETT Leveraging Laptops Initiative and its impact on teaching practices. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(2), 143-159.

Dockstader, J. (2008). Teachers of the 21st century know the what, why, and how of technology integration. Retrieved from May 19 2020

Drayton, B., Falk, J. K., Stroud, R., Hobbs, K., & Hammerman, J. (2010). After installation: Ubiquitous computing and high school science in three experienced, high-technology schools. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(3), 1-57.

Eady, M. J., & Lockyer, L. (2013). Tools for learning: technology and teaching strategies: Learning to teach in the primary school. Queensland University of Technology, Australia. pp. 71-89.

Eaton, S. E. (2010). Global trends in language learning in the twenty-first century. Calgary, Canada: Onate Press.

Freeman, L. D., & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford: OUP.

Gençlter, B. (2015). How does technology affect language learning process at an early age? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 311 – 316. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.552

Gilakjani, A. (2013). Factors contributing to teachers’ use of computer technology in the classroom. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 262-267. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2013.010317

Gilakjani, A. (2014). A detailed analysis of some important issues towards using computer technology in EFL classrooms. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(2), 146-153. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2014.020206

Gilakjani, A. (2017). A review of the literature on the integration of technology into the learning and teaching of English language skills. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(5), 95-106. DOI:

Gilakjani, A., Leong, L. M., & Hairul, N. I. (2013). Teachers’ use of technology and constructivism. I. J. Modern Education and Computer Science, 4, 49-63. DOI: 10.5815/ijmecs.2013.04.07

Gillespie, H. (2006). Unlocking learning and teaching with ICT: Identifying and overcoming barriers. London: David Fulton.

Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. New York: Pearson Education. DOI: 10.4324/9781315833743

Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching. England: Pearson. Retrieved on March 19, 2019, from

Hennessy, S. (2005). Emerging teacher strategies for supporting. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge.

Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 155-192. DOI: 10.29252/ijree.3.2.115

İŞMAN, A. (2012). Technology and technique: An educational perspective. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2), 207-213.

Keser, H., Uzunboylu, H., & Ozdamli, F. (2012). The trends in technology-supported collaborative learning studies in the 21st century. World Journal on Educational Technology, 3(2), 103-119.

Lam, Y., & Lawrence, G. (2002). Teacher-student role redefinition during a computer-based second language project: Are computers catalysts for empowering change? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(3), 295-315.

Murphy, K., DePasquale, R., & McNamara, E. (2003). Meaningful Connections: Using Technology in Primary Classrooms. Young Children, 58(6), 12-18. Retrieved on March 21, 2019, from

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2010). Are the new millennium learners making the grade? Technology use and educational performance in PISA: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, OECD.

Patel, C. (2013). Use of multimedia technology in teaching and learning communication skills: An analysis. International Journal of Advancements in Research & Technology, 2(7), 116-123.

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 1625 times | PDF view : 224 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

License URL:




Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.