Exploring the Use of ESL Composition Profile for College Writing in the Indonesian Context

Lestari - Setyowati(1*), Sony - Sukmawan(2), Ana Ahsana El-Sulukkiyah(3),

(1) Faculty of Pedagogy and Psychology, Universitas PGRI Wiranegara, Pasuruan, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Cultural Studies, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Pedagogy and Psychology, Universitas PGRI Wiranegara, Pasuruan, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v4i2.13662

Abstract


Assessing writing is a demanding task. If a lecturer of writing is not prepared with a reliable scoring rubric, the students’ real performance might not be known. One of the well-known English as a second language (ESL) writing rubric is the Jacobs ESL Composition Profile which was developed by Jacobs, Zingraf, Wormuth,  Hartfiel,  &  Hughey in 1981, known as Jacobs ESL Composition Profile. This scoring rubric is popular among writing teachers and researchers to score students’ composition. The present study is intended to 1) find out the internal consistency between raters who use the scoring rubric to assess the students’ essay, and 2) describe the level of the students’ writing performance when assessed by using Jacobs ESL scoring rubric, and 3) describe the raters’ opinion when using the profile. The study uses descriptive quantitative design. The instruments to collect the data are documentation and interview. The data were collected in three months, from February to April 2020. The subjects of the study were two writing lecturers who taught English as a foreign language (EFL) and became raters for a research grant. The raters were asked to score 37 essays of the fourth-semester students.   The result of the study shows that there is internal consistency between rater 1 and rater 2 when scoring the students’ essay by using Jacobs ESL Composition Profile is high (r. = 0.674, α = 0.00 < 0.05). The Cronbach alpha analysis also shows 0.722 which indicates a strong and high level of consistency. The students’ writing performance fall in the average – good (moderate) level (49%), very good (high) level (40%), and only five students (11%) fall in the below-average – poor (low) level category. The result also reveals that Jacobs ESL Composition Profile is considered reliable to score essays even though it requires skills and practice because of its detailed description

Keywords


Jacobs ESL composition profile, perspective, reliability, rubric, writing

Full Text:

PDF

References


Babbin, E. H & Harrison, K. (1999). Contemporary Composition Studies: A Guide to Theorists and Terms. London: Greenwood Publishing Group

Bacha, N. (2001). Writing evaluation: what can analytic versus holistic essay scoring tell us? System, 29, 371- 383.

Beyreli, L & Ari, G. (2009). The Use of Analytic Rubric in the Assessment of Writing Performance-Inter-Rater Concordance Study. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri / Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice . 1,105-125. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ837777.pdf

Brooks, Gavin. (2012). Assessment and Academic Writing: A Look at the Use of Rubrics in the Second Language Writing Classroom. Kwansei Gakuin University Humanities Review. 17, 227-240. Retrieved from http://kgur.kwansei.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/10236/10548/1/17-18.PDF

Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to Create and Use Rubrics for Formative Assessment and Grading. Alexandria: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interview Approach to Language Pedagogy, Second Edition.New York: Longman, Inc.

Boyer, M. (2020). Understanding and Mitigating Rater Inaccuracies in Educational Assessment Scoring. Center for Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.nciea.org/blog/educational-assessment/understanding-and-mitigating-rater-inaccuracies-educational-assessment

Falk, J. S. (1979). Language Acquisition and the Teaching and Learning of Writing." College English 41, 436-47.

Ghanbari,B., Barati, H., & Moinzadeh, A. (2012). Rating Scales Revisited: EFL Writing Assessment Context of Iran under Scrutiny. Language Testing in Asia. 2 (1), 83-100

González, E. F., Trejo, N. P. &Roux, R. (2017). Assessing EFLuniversity students’ writing: a study of score reliability. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 19(2), 91-103.https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2017.19.2.928

Jacobs, H. L., S. A. Zingraf, D. R. Wormuth, V. F. Hartfiel, and J. B. Hughey. (1981). Testing ESL Composition: A Practical Approach. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Klimova, B. F. (2011). Evaluating writing in English as a second language. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 28, 390 – 394

Latief, M.A. (1990). Assessment of English Writing Skills for Students of English as a foreign Language at the Institute of Teachers Training and Education IKIP Malang Indonesia. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Iowa: Graduate College of the University of Iowa.

Latief, M.A. (2014). Research Methods on Language Learning: An Introduction (2nd Ed). Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang (UM Press)

Lee, Y W, Gentile, C, & and Kantor, R. (2008). Analytic Scoring of TOEFL® CBT Essays: Scores From Humans and E-rater. Princeton: ETS

Martin-Kniep, G. O. (2000). Becoming a better teacher: Eight innovations that work. Alexandria: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.

Perkins, K & Brutten, S. R. . (1990). Writing: A Holistic Or Atomistic Entity? Journal of Basic Writing . 9 (1), 75-84

Rumsey, D. (2011). Statistics Workbook For Dummies, Statistics II For Dummies, and Probability For Dummies. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons

Setyowati, L. (2016). The Effect of Planning on EFL Students' Writing Performance Across Different Levels of Self-Efficacy. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Malang: State University of Malang.

Sujarweni, V.W. (2014). SPSS Untuk Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press

Taylor, B. P. (1981). Content and Written Form: A Two-Way Street." TESOL Quarterly 15, 5-13.

Weigle, S. C.. (2002). Assessing Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wang, P. (2009). The Inter-rater Reliability in Scoring Composition. English Language Teaching, 2(3), 39-43. (Online) Retrieved from www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt

Zhang, B. Xiao, Y., & Luo, J. (2015). Rater Reliability and Score Discrepancy Under Holistic and Analytic Scoring of Second Language Writing. Language Testing in Asia, 5 (5). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-015-0014-4


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 1421 times | PDF view : 247 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


License URL: https://creativecommons.org/

 

 

 

Creative Commons License


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.