Association between Oral Error Corrections of University Teacher and English Majors’ Language Anxiety in Philippine Higher Education Context

Herford Rei Biscayno Guibangguibang(1*),

(1) Jose Rizal Memorial State University, Zamboanga del Norte, Philippines
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v4i2.13601

Abstract


This study sought to answer the question on the level of English language anxiety in the ESL and mainstream classrooms of 61 total number of English major students utilizing the 20-item self-assessment questionnaire of English Language Anxiety Scale (ELAS) developed by Pappamihiel (2002). Actual one-hour footage of classroom was documented through a MONACORR audio-recorder, thrice with each teacher. The recorder was given to one of the teachers’ students without knowledge for the authenticity of their oral corrections. After having identified the existing oral error corrections by the English teachers through audio-recording, a self-made questionnaire was answered by the students to find what is the rate of occurrence of the identified oral error correction styles. The frequency count, weighted mean, and Chi-square tests were the statistical tools used to answer the problems posed in this study. Findings divulged after the transcription, teachers were only utilizing elicitation, explicit correction, recast, and repetition. Moreover, students perceived that elicitation oral error correction type is often used while explicit correction, recast, and repetition are only used sometimes by their English teachers.  Meanwhile, ELAS results indicate levels of language anxiety in the ESL classes and mainstream, although language anxiety is significantly higher in ESL classes. As to correlation, it was found out that the rate of occurrence of explicit correction, recast, and repetition as perceived by ESL English major students of their English teachers’ oral error correction types have no significant relationships to their English language anxiety. This study suggests that oral error correction has nothing to do with the English language anxiety of English major students and that English teachers shall retain the practice of the oral error correction for it does not give high level of learners’ anxiety in learning English.

 


Keywords


English language anxiety, Oral Error Correction, Elicitation, Explicit Correction, Recast, Repetition

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agudo, J. M. (2013). An investigation into how EFL learners emotionally respond to teachers' oral corrective feedback. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 15. doi:10.14483/udistrial.jour.calj.2013.2.a08

Calsiyao, I. (2015). Corrective feedback in classroom oral errors among Kalinga-Apayao State College students. International Journal of Social science and Humanities Research,Vol. 3, Issue 1, pp: (394-400).

Chaudron (1977). A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners’ errors. Language Learning, 27, 29-46.

Del Villar, C. (2010). Beginning Filipino student’s attributions about oral communication anxiety.Journal Media and Communication Studies vol.2 (7), pp. 159-169.Retrieved fromhttp://www.academicjournals.org/jmcs

Hashemi, M. (2011). Language stress and anxiety among the English language learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1811-1816.

Horwitz, E. K. (1986). Preliminary evidence for the reliability and validity of a foreign language anxiety scale. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 559-562.

Huang , S., Eslami, Z., & Hu , R.-J. (2010). The Relationship between Teacher and Peer Support and English-Language Learners' Anxiety. English Language Teaching, 32-40.

Kao, P.-C., & Craigie, P. (2013). Coping strategies of Tawanese university students as predictors of English language learning anxiety. Social Behaviour and Personaloty: an international journal, 41(3), 411-419.

Khattak, Z., Jamshed, T., Ahmad, A., & Baig, M. (2011). An investigation into the causes of English language learning anxiety in students at AWKUM. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1600-1604.

Li, S. (2013). Oral Corrective Feedback. ELT Journal, 68(2), 196-198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct076

Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation in communication classrooms. Studies on Second Language Acquisition, 37-66. Retrieved from Digital.library.mchill.ca/R/files/roy/lyster_ranta1997_SSLA.pdf

Mumford , S., & Darn, S. (2020). Classroom management: Speaking correction techniques. Macmillan Education Limited. Retrieved from http://www.onestopenglish.com/methodology/teaching-articles/classroom-management/classroom-management-speaking-correction-techniques/146455.article

Pappamihiel, E. (2002). English as a Second Language Students and English Language Anxiety: Issues in the Mainstream Classroom. Research in the Teaching of English, 36.

Shirkhani, S., & Tajeddin, Z. (2016). L2 teacher's explicit and implicit corrective feedback and its linguistic focus. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 181-206.

Tabatabaei, O. and BanitaLebi, A. (2011). Feedback strategies in Foreign language reading classes. Asian Culture and History, 3(2), 59-70.

Tanveer, M. (2007). Investigation of the factors that cause language anxiety for ESL/EFL learners in learning speaking skills and the influence it casts on communcation in the target language

Tomczyk, E. (2013). Perceptions of oral errors and their corrective feedback: teachers vs. students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(5), 924-931. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticsscholar.org/cf5f/7a7b7a669579747e4b5d8f381f4c5fbc6c00.pdf


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 851 times | PDF view : 157 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


License URL: https://creativecommons.org/

 

 

 

Creative Commons License


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.