Map Analysis of The Pro-Con Arguments Against Permendikbud 30 Of Sexual Violence

Mariano Werenfridus(1*), Iradhad Taqwa Sihidi(2), Krishno Hadi(3),

(1) University of Muhammadiyah Malang
(2) University of Muhammadiyah Malang
(3) University of Muhammadiyah Malang
(*) Corresponding Author



The Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia (Ministry of education and culture-Research and Technology) issued a Permendikbud No. 30 the Year 2021 on the Prevention and Handling of Sexual Violence (PPKS) in the College Environment. The policy raises pros - cons that are caused by the presence of the controversy the purpose and contents of the Culture of the. This study analyzes the perspectives of people through social media in response to the discharge of Permendikbud 30 of these. Descriptive qualitative methods as well as using secondary data collected through the social media Twitter. The direction of the study is based on Social Network Analysis (SNA) is a map of pro-contra to Permendikbud 30 about sexual violence that is obtained through the Drone Emprit Publications. The scope of the study discusses 1). The trend and the Volume of Pro - Counter Culture 30, 2). SNA Permendikbud 30 (Cluster Pro and Cluster Counter), 3) SNA “Bridge” Permendikbud 30, 4). Clique/The Huddle, 5). Hashtag Pros and Cons Permendikbud 30, 6). Top Influencers: Pro - Cons Permendikbud 30, 7). The analysis of the emotions of cluster Pro - Cons. The results of the analysis show that the issuance of Permendikbud 30 raises pro-cons and war the hashtags that are dominated by the group pro. Thus, this study based on the analysis of the data shows that the enthusiasm of the community in social movements in the form of a response to government policy is very high either a stronghold of the pro or the stronghold of the counter.


Analysis of the SNA, Drone Emprit Publications, Permendikbud 30

Full Text:



Analytica, O. (2019). Fast media cycle will hinder prudent policymaking. Expert Briefings. Arianto, B.---. (2021). Analisis Peran Buzzer Media Sosial dalam Memperkuat Kampanye Petani Milenial. JRK (Jurnal Riset Komunikasi), 11(2).

Bakry, GN (2020). Struktur Jaringan Pengguna Twitter dengan Tagar #Bandunglawancovid19. Jurnal Komunikasi Global, 9(2), 209–229.

Bakry, GN, & Kusmayadi, IM (2021). Peran Pers Sebagai Aktor Gerakan Digital Tagar #SolidaritasUntukNTT di Twitter. Jurnal Kajian Jurnalisme, 5(1), 98.

Cheng, Y., Hung-Baesecke, CJF, & Chen, YRR (2021). Social Media Influencer Effects on CSR Communication: The Role of Influencer Leadership in Opinion and Taste. International Journal of Business Communication.

Endrian MJ, Dewi Adawiya, DS (2019). Prevention Sexual Harassment on Girls Students of Junior High School Ciamis. Jurnal Stikrs MUhammadiyah Ciamis: Jurnal Kesehatan, 6(April 2018), 1–7.21

Fitriana P, A., Ema, E., & Lubis, FO (2020). Perang Tagar Di Ruang Virtual Diskursus Politik Capres Pasca Debat Putaran Kedua. Jurnal Komunikasi, 12(1), 30.

Fuchs, C. (2017). From digital positivism and administrative big data analytics towards critical digital and social media research! European Journal of Communication, 32(1), 37–49.

Handini, VA, & Dunan, A. (2021). Buzzer as the Driving Force for Buzz Marketing on Twitter in the 2019 Indonesian Presidential Election. International Journal of Science, Technology & Management, 2(2), 479–491.

Isa, D., & Himelboim, I. (2018). A Social Networks Approach to Online Social Movement: Social Mediators and Mediated Content in #FreeAJStaff Twitter Network. Social Media and Society, 4(1).

Ishak, D., & Seksual, K. (nd). Artikel Pelecehan Seksual Di Institusi Pendidikan: Sebuah. 2(2), 136–144.

Juzar, MT, & Akbar, S. (2018). Buzzer Detection on Twitter Using Modified Eigenvector Centrality. Proceedings of 2018 5th International Conference on Data and Software Engineering, ICoDSE 2018, 1–5.

Kaya, A. (2017). Right to public space: social movements and active citizenship in Turkey. Research and Policy on Turkey, 2(1), 1–9.

Liao, W., Bazarova, NN, Yuan, YC and McLeod, PL (2021). How Has Technology Changed Group Communication? A Keyword Analysis of Research on Groups and Technology. The Emerald Handbook of Group and Team Communication Research, Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley.

Ma, L. (2020). How the Interplay of Consumer-Brand Identification and Crises Influences the Effectiveness of Corporate Response Strategies. International Journal of Business Communication, 1–21.

Murthy, D. (2018). Introduction to SocialMedia, Activism, and Organizations. Social Media and Society, 4(1). O'Meara, V. (2019). Weapons of the Chic: Instagram Influencer Engagement Pods as 20

Oxford Analytica. (2018). Distortion by social media bots will become targeted. Expert Briefings. Oxford Analytica. (2021). Calls to audit social media algorithms will rise. Expert Briefings. Ray, R., Brown, M., Fraistat, N., & Summers, E. (2017). Ferguson and the death of Michael Brown on Twitter: #BlackLivesMatter, #TCOT, and the evolution of collective identities. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(11), 1797–1813.

Practices of Resistance to Instagram Platform Labor. Social Media and Society, 5(4).

Raynauld, V., Richez, E., & Boudreau Morris, K. (2018). Canada is #IdleNoMore: exploring dynamics of Indigenous political and civic protest in the Twitterverse. Information Communication and Society, 21(4), 626–642.

Rusyidi, B., Bintari, A., & Wibowo, H. (2019). Pengalaman Dan Pengetahuan Tentang Pelecehan Seksual: Studi Awal Di Kalangan Mahasiswa Perguruan Tinggi (Experience and Knowledge on Sexual Harassment: a Preliminary Study Among Indonesian University Students). Share: Social Work Journal, 9(1), 75.

Setyawan, A. (2019). Pengaruh Persepsi Dan Penggunaan Media Sosial Terhadap Terpaan Berita Hoax Tagar #Justiceforaudrey Di Kalangan Pelajar Sma Negeri Di Kecamatan Pesanggrahan. Jurnal Komunikatio, 5(2), 47–54.

Sung, KH, & Kim, S. (2021). Do Organizational Personification and Personality Matter? The Effect of Interaction and Conversational Tone on Relationship Quality in Social Media. International Journal of Business Communication, 58(4), 582– 606.

Suswanta, PA (2021). Bentuk Dan Jaringan Patron-Klien Politik Uang Pada Pemilu Legislatif Tahun 2019 Di Kabupaten Tasikmalaya Tinggi: 2(3), 170–183. Valenzuela, S., Correa, T., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2018). Ties, Likes, and Tweets: Using Strong and Weak Ties to Explain Differences in Protest Participation Across Facebook and Twitter Use. Political Communication, 35(1), 117–134.

Van Zoonen, W., Sivunen, A., Rice, RE, & Treem, JW (2021). Organizational Information and Communication Technologies and Their Influence on Communication Visibility and Perceived Proximity. International Journal of Business Communication.

Wahyudi, I., Bahri, S., & Handayani, P. (2019). Aplikasi Pembelajaran Pengenalan Budaya Indonesia. V (1), 135–138. Wang, L., Wang, Z., Wang, X. and Zhao, Y. (2021). Assessing word-of-mouth reputation of influencers on B2C live streaming platforms: the role of the characteristics of information source. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. Yeo, SL, Pang, A., Cheong, M., & Yeo, JQ (2020). Emotions in SocialMedia: An Analysis of Tweet Responses to MH370 Search Suspension Announcement. International Journal of Business Communication, 57(2), 194–211.

Zamzuardi, Y. (2019). Analisis Wacana Kasus Pelecehan Seksual Terhadap Perempuan Pada Berita Online Dalam Perspektif Analisis Sara Mils. Dialektika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 6(1), 36–53.

Zhang, H., & Liang, X. (2018). 2018 Global Marketing Conference at Tokyo Proceedings 2018. 2018 Global Marketing Conference at Tokyo Proceedings 2018, 201(July), 1119–1129.

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 454 times | PDF view : 117 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Mariano Werenfridus, Iradhad Taqwa Sihidi, Krishno Hadi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Diterbitkan oleh:

Program Studi Ilmu Administrasi Publik

Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Makassar


JIAP Index By:


View My Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.