Analysis of The Use of Chinese Degree Adverbs by Indonesian Students

Diana Constansz Sahertian(1*),

(1) Nanjing University
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/eralingua.v7i1.43225

Abstract


Abstract. Degree adverbs are one of the important and difficult learning points in Teaching Chinese as a second language (TCSL). Commonly, Chinese degree adverbs are divided into two types and four levels. Each type and level have different collocations, semantic features, etc. According to the academic article collections in CNKI and google scholar, research on Chinese degree adverbs from the perspective of TCSL for Indonesian students is still very limited. This study discusses the use of Chinese degree Adverbs by Indonesian students. This study aims to describe the student selection of Chinese degree adverbs and to find the most frequent error types in using four commonly used comparative degree adverbs: low-level ‘shaowei’, medium-level ‘bijiao’, high-level ‘geng’, and extreme-level ‘zui’. The approach to this study is a quantitative-qualitative method. The samples are Chinese Department students at one of the universities in Bandung city. The data was collected from two exercises. This study applies the error analysis procedure introduced by McDowell to find the most frequent error types. The result shows that the students tend to use pure degree adverbs, and the most used pure degree adverb is high-level ‘hen’, followed by its synonymous words ‘tebie’, ‘feichang’, ‘tai’, and ‘shifen’.  In using synonymous degree adverbs, students tend to use the first learned word. The form of exercises in the teaching material should encourage the student to use more varied degree adverbs. The most frequent error types in using four different levels of comparative degree adverbs are selection in bijiao word sentences and zui word sentences, misordering of degree adverbs, and the omission of complement ‘yidianr/yixie’ in shaowei word sentences. The major cause of the errors is intralingual interference. This study made some suggestions for the improvement of Chinese degree adverbs teaching material based on the findings.

Keywords: Chinese Degree Adverbs, Selection Tendencies, Frequent Error Types, Indonesian Students

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (5th Ed.). New York: Pearson Education.

Cai, L. (2022). Research on the Comprehension of the “Degree Adverb + Noun” Structure in Modern Chinese. Chinese Character Culture, 319(21), 26–29. https://doi.org/10.14014/j.cnki.cn11-2597/ g2.2022.21.036

Chandra, M. R. (2020). A Comparative Analysis of Indonesian Adverb of Scope “hanya” and Chinese “dan, guang, jin, zhi.” Jurnal Cakrawala Mandarin, 3(2), 45. https://doi.org/10.36279/apsmi.v3i2.84

Chen, Jianming. (2018). A Brief Discussion on the Comparative Study of the Subjectivity of Comparative Degree Adverbs in Japanese and Chinese. Intelligence, 18, 187.

Chen, Jiaqi. (2021). A Corpus-Based Error Analysis in the Use of Adverb of Degree “tai” by Indonesian Students. Neijiang Keji, 1, 118-120+154. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:KJNJ.0.2021-01-069.

Corder, S. P. (1973). Introducing Applied Linguistics. Penguin Education.

Cui, X. (2022). Stance-taking of degree adverbs in Chinese language. TCSOL Studies, 2. https://doi.org/10.16131/j.cnki.cn44-1669/g4.2022.02.011

Han, R. (2000). Degree Adverb in Modern Chinese. Chinese Language Learning, 2, 12–15.

Laurencia, N. (2019). Error Analysis and Teaching Strategies of Chinese Time Adverbs “Zai” and “Cai” for Indonesian Students. Lingua Cultura, 13(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v13i2.5390

Li, J. (2021). A comparative study of the degree adverb hen‘ ’in Chinese and “very” in English. Chinese Character Culture, 276(04), 123–124. https://doi.org/10.14014/j.cnki.cn11- 2597/g2.2021.04.057

Liu, B. (2021). A Brief Analysis of the Usage of Degree Adverbs in Modern Chinese——"hen, zhen, tai" as Examples. Ming Jia Ming Zuo, 8, 112–113. https://gb.global.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFDLASN2021&filename=MJMZ202108053&uniplatform=OVERSEA&v=vzQzGXDSHriz8hxXp-oV8XUkSeoWmwq7WV4WriBKEtKUPrBiQxmjqUZ71YC6CmEu

Liu, C. (2021). Analysis on Acquisition of Chinese Degree Adverbs “hen” and “feichang”——Japanese Learners as an Example. Sinogram Culture, 10, 16–18. https://doi.org/10.14014/j.cnki.cn11-2597/g2.2021.10.007

McDowell, L. (2020). Error Analysis: A Methodological Exploration and Application. JALT Postconference Publication. 2019. https://doi.org/10.37546/jaltpcp2019-53

Susilo, P. M. (2019). Comparative Analysis of the Use of Degree Adverb in Mandarin and Indonesian. Business Economic, Communication, and Social Sciences (BECOSS) Journal, 1(1), 117–123.

Tuo, A. (2008). A Syntactic and Semantic Analysis of the Degree Adverb in the Teaching Chinese as a Foreign Language. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition), 2, 87–91. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:BLDS.0.2008-02-019.

Wang, Jiatian, & Wang, Z. (2016). Research on the Acquisition of Chinese Comparative Degree-ADVs by American Foreign Students. Sinogram Culture, 4, 86–89. https://doi.org/10.14014/j.cnki.cn11-2597/g2.2016.04.022

Wang, Jiawei, & Liu, J. (2022). Adverb “feichang” Errors Analysis in Intermediate and Low-level Chinese Learners. JinGu Creative Literature, 102(06), 116–119. https://doi.org/10.20024/j.cnki.cn42-1911/i.2022.06.037

Wang, L. (1985). Modern Chinese Grammar. The Commercial Press.

Wang, S. (2018). The Functional Usage and Semantic Features of New Degree Adverbs “Chao” and “Ju.” Journal of the Northwest Adult Education, 138(06), 86–91.

Wilujeng, N. C. S., & Fan, S. (2022). Adjective + yi dian in Mandarin Chinese and its equivalent in Indonesian language: A contrastive analysis. Diksi, 30(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.21831/diksi.v30i1.45680

Yessica, Y., Untari, D., & Shuiqing, Z. (2018). Analisis Kesalahan Penggunaan Kata Keterangan Bahasa Tionghoa dalam Tugas Vlog Mahasiswa Sastra Tionghoa Universitas Kristen Petra Angkatan 2015. Century: Journal of Chinese Language, Literature and Culture, 5(2), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.9744/century.6.2.71-83

Zhou, X. (2021). Brief Discussion on Adverbs of Degree in Modern Chinese. Literature Education, 8, 80–81. https://doi.org/10.16692/j.cnki.wxjyx.2021.08.033.

Zhu, L. (2020). A Review of the Combination of “Degree Adverb + Noun” in Modern Chinese. Journal of Taizhou University, 42(01), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.13853/j.cnki.issn.1672-3708.2020.01.009

Zhu, L. (2021). A Comprehensive Analysis of Three New Functions of Degree Advrebs in Modern Chinese. Journal of Taizhou University, 43(04), 56-61+68. https://doi.org/10.13853/j.cnki.issn.1672-3708.2021.04.009

Zhu, L. (2022). On the Driving and Hindering Factors of the Evolution of New Degree Adverbs in Modern Chinese. Journal of Taizhou University, 44(05), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.13853/j.cnki.issn.1672-3708.2022 .05.004

Zobl, H., & Liceras, J. M. (1994). Functional Categories and Acquisition Orders. Language Learning, 44(1), 159–180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01452.x


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 319 times | PDF view : 4 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 

Flag Counter

 

Eralingua has been indexed by: