Analysis and Comparison of the Theoretical Model of the Relationship between Reading and Writing

Ediwarman Ediwarman(1*), Syafrizal Syafrizal(2), John Pahamzah(3),

(1) Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
(2) Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
(3) Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/eralingua.v6i2.18975

Abstract


Abstract. This study compares and evaluates three alternative theoretical models of the relevant writing relationships. The reading dimensions of this model include components of understanding of places and parts. Dimensions include components of spelling, vocabulary, word structure, and story structure. These models differ with respect to the order in which the dimensions of reading and writing are related. The interactive model allows the use of reading knowledge in writing, and vice versa. Other models (read-to-write; write-to-read) only allow knowledge to move in one direction. These models are evaluated based on the model. The ability to explain the relationships found in the extensive corpus of reading and collecting data from 256 second graders and 251 fourth graders. The interactive model fits the data better than the read-to-write model at the second grade level and the write-to-read model at both grade levels and the read-to-write model are superior to the write-to-write model.  Specific relationships are examined and pedagogical implications.

Keywords: Analysis, Model Comparison, Reading, Writing.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baumann, J. F. (1983). Commentary on critique of early word recognition studies.In L. M. Gentile, M. L. Kamil, & J. S. Blancbard (Eds.), Reading research revisited (pp. 77-82). Columbus, OH: Merrill.

Chomsky, C. (2004). Approaching reading through invented spelling. Paper presented at the Conference on Theory and Practice of Beginning Reading Instruction, University of Pittsburgh Learning Research and Development Center.

Cooper, C. R., & Matsuhashi, A. (2003). A theory of the writing process.

Freedman, S. W., & Calfee, R. C. (2004). Understanding and compre­ hending. Written Communication, 1, 459-490.

Giacobbe, M. E. (2015). Who says that children can't write the first week of school? In R. D. Walshe (Ed.), Donald Graves in Australia - "Children want to write... " (pp. 99-104). Exeter, NH: Heinemann.

Goodman, K., & Goodman, Y. (2004). Reading and writing relationships: Pragmatic functions. Language Arts, 60, 590-599.

Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W.

Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Mosenthal, P. (1983). Review of Relating reading and writing: Developing a transactional theory of the writing process. Journal of Reading Behavior, 15, 75-77.

Shanahan, T. (1984). Nature of the reading-writing relation: An explanatory multivariate analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 466-477.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 227 times | PDF view : 2 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 

Flag Counter

 

Eralingua has been indexed by: