Nitaqat Program and Decree Saudi Nationality's Effects on Work Interest Mediated by Salary Range

Dilal Adlin Fadi(1*),

(1) Pelita Harapan University, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/ja.v10i1.43214

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to test and analyze the influence of the national Nitaqot and SK schemes on the working interest of pharmacists, test and analyze the effect of the national Nitaqot and SK schemes on the salary range, test and analyze the mediating impact of the wage range in the Nitaqot program on the working interest of pharmacists and to test and analyze the influence of Saudi national decisions mediating wage ranges on pharmacist job interest. This study uses a type of quantitative research that will test the hypothesis (correlation). The research samples are individual pharmacists who are employees at the existing Directorate of Operations of Kimia Farma Dawaa. Co.Ltd in 2021. This research uses a non-probability sampling technique because there is little research time, and the research costs are not high. H1 - The Nitaqot program has a negative impact on the working interest of pharmacists H2 - The Saudi national decree has a positive effect on the working interest of pharmacists H3 - The Nitaqot program has a positive impact on the salary range H4 - The Saudi national decree has a positive effect on the wage range H5 - Salary range has a positive impact on the Pharmacist's Job Interest H6 - The salary range mediates the Nitaqot program against the working interest of pharmacists H7 - The Saudi state's decision to mediate the Nitaqot scheme against the work interests of pharmacists

Keywords


Nitaqat program, saudi nationality decree, pharmacist profession, work interest, salary range

Full Text:

PDF

References


Albassam, B. . (2011). Political Reform in Saudi Arabia: Necessity or Luxury? Middle East Studies Online Journal, 3(6).

Budhwar, P. (2019). The state of HRM in the Middle East: Challenges and future research agenda. Asia Pac J Manag, 3(6), 905–933.

Dahlan, M., & Sopiyudin. (2014). Besar sampel dan Cara Pengambilan Sampel. Salemba Medika.

Fornell, C. D., & Lacker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.

Furchan. (2004). Introduction to Research in Education. Student Library.

Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th Editio). Prentice Hall.

Haryono, S. (2017). Metode SEM untuk penelitian Manajemen, AMOS,LISREL PLS. PT Luxima metro media.

Hu, L. –., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.

Kock, N., & Lynn, G. (2012). Lateral Collinearity and Misleading Results in Variance-Based SEM: An Illustration and Recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13, 546–580. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00302

Nunnally, J. ., & Bernstein, I. . (1994). The Assessment of Reliability. Psychometric Theory, 3, 248–292.

Putka, D. J., & Sackett, P. R. (2010). Reliability and validity. APA PsycNet.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 68 times | PDF view : 17 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Dilal Adlin Fadi, Sabrina O. Sihombing

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.