The Influence of Problem Based Learning and Student Teams Achievement Divisions on Student Achievement

Arina Mustaanah(1*),

(1) Universitas Kristen Setya Wacana, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/ja.v9i2.38964

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to find out how the application of the Problem Based Learning and Study Team Achievement Desicion learning model affects the learning achievement of 5th grade elementary school students in thematic learning. The research method uses a quasi-experimental or quasi-experimental method with the research design of Nonequivalent Control Group Design. In this study, researchers used two groups, namely the experimental 1 group which is treated with the Problem Based Learning model and the experimental 2 group which is required by the Student Team Achievement Divisions learning model. The sample was determined by total sampling, which means that the entire population became the research sample, namely the 5th grade students of SDN Purworejo, totaling 19 students and SDN Dersansari 02, totaling 22 students, meaning that the total sample was 41 students. Data collection tools using normative tests and data analysis using normality test, homogeneity test, and hypothesis testing. The results of the study in terms of the results of the different test (t) determine the experimental 1 class of 75.79 and the experimental 2 class of 84.09. Meanwhile, the results of the N-Gain test showed that the experimental 1 class was 39.9% and the experimental 2 class was 60.3%, so it can be concluded that improving student learning achievement is more effective when using the STAD model.


Keywords


Learning Achievement; Problem Based Learning; Student Team Achievement Divisions.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alanoglu, M., Aslan, S., & Karabatak, S. (2022). Do teachers’ educational philosophies affect their digital literacy? The mediating effect of resistance to change. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3447–3466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10753-3

Barth, V. L., Piwowar, V., Kumschick, I. R., Ophardt, D., & Thiel, F. (2019). The impact of direct instruction in a problem-based learning setting. Effects of a video-based training program to foster preservice teachers’ professional vision of critical incidents in the classroom. International Journal of Educational Research, 95, 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.03.002

Castaneda, D. I., Manrique, L. F., & Cuellar, S. (2018). Is organizational learning being absorbed by knowledge management? A systematic review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(2), 299–325. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2017-0041

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Damopolii, I., & Rahman, S. R. (2019). The effect of STAD learning model and science comics on cognitive students achievement. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(2), 22008.

Elacqua, G., & Marotta, L. (2020). Is working one job better than many? Assessing the impact of multiple school jobs on teacher performance in Rio de Janeiro. Economics of Education Review, 78, 102015. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2020.102015

Hobbs, R., & Tuzel, S. (2017). Teacher motivations for digital and media literacy: An examination of Turkish educators. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12326

Hoffmann, C., Kobetic, M., Alford, N., Blencowe, N., Ramirez, J., Macefield, R., Blazeby, J. M., Avery, K. N. L., & Potter, S. (2022). Shared Learning Utilizing Digital Methods in Surgery to Enhance Transparency in Surgical Innovation: Protocol for a Scoping Review. JMIR Research Protocols, 11(9), e37544. https://doi.org/10.2196/37544

John W Creswell. (2013). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed (Tiga). Pustaka Pelajar.

Kamaluddin, L. O. A., Haerul, H., Akib, H., & Salam, R. (2018). Analysis Of Factors Influencing Student Learning Achievement.

Kazu, I. Y., & Demirkol, M. (2014). Effect of Blended Learning Environment Model on High School Students’ Academic Achievement. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 13(1), 78–87.

Lefa, B. (2014). The Piaget theory of cognitive development: An educational implications. Research Gate, 1(9), 1–9.

McCombs, B. L., Daniels, D. H., & Perry, K. E. (2008). Children’s and teachers’ perceptions of learner-centered practices, and student motivation: Implications for early schooling. Elementary School Journal, 109(1), 16–35. https://doi.org/10.1086/592365

McKnight, K., O’Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856

Miterianifa, Trisnayanti, Y., Khoiri, A., & Ayu, H. D. (2019). Meta-analysis: The effect of problem-based learning on students’ critical thinking skills. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2194(December). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5139796

Naji, K. K., Du, X., Tarlochan, F., Ebead, U., Hasan, M. A., & Al-Ali, A. K. (2020). Engineering students’ readiness to transition to emergency online learning in response to COVID-19: Case of Qatar. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(10). https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/8474

Nakajima, T. M., & Goode, J. (2019). Transformative learning for computer science teachers: Examining how educators learn e-textiles in professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 148–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.05.004

Nakata, Y. (2019). Encouraging student teachers to support self-regulated learning: A multiple case study on prospective language teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 95, 200–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.01.007

Saariaho, E., Toom, A., Soini, T., Pietarinen, J., & Pyhältö, K. (2019). Student teachers’ and pupils’ co-regulated learning behaviours in authentic classroom situations in teaching practicums. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 92–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.06.003

Shafritz, J. M., Russell, E. W., Borick, C. P., & Hyde, A. C. (2017). Introducing public administration. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1080/00922013.1975.11000035

Sletten, S. R. (2017). Investigating flipped learning: Student self-regulated learning, perceptions, and achievement in an introductory biology course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(3), 347–358.

Stringer, E. T. (2008). Action research in education. Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Suprapto, E., & Sunarsi, D. (2020). The Effect Of the Implementation of Plant Lay Out the Rightand Availability of Raw Materials on the Production Flow In Indo Karuna Steel. International Journal of Education, Information Technology, and Others, 3(2), 1–9.

Tsybulsky, D., & Muchnik-Rozanov, Y. (2019). The development of student-teachers’ professional identity while team-teaching science classes using a project-based learning approach: A multi-level analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 79, 48–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.12.006

Vallejo-Huanga, D., Morillo, P., & Ferri, C. (2019). A dataset of attributes from papers of a machine learning conference. Data in Brief, 24, 103836. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.103836

Vekić-Kljaić, V., & Mlinarević, V. (2022). Professional development of educators’ online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Republic of Croatia. SN Social Sciences, 2(10), 223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00527-0


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 115 times | PDF view : 24 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Arina Mustaanah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.