Analisis Kesalahan Penggunaan Kata Pelengkap Arah 趋向补语 (Qūxiàng Bǔyǔ) 来 (Lái) Dan 去 (Qù) Pada Kalimat Bahasa Mandarin Siswa Kelas Xi Mas An Nuriyah Bontocini Jeneponto

Sasmita Sasmita(1*), Misnawaty Usman(2), Arini Junaeny(3),

(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(3) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/wenchuang.v1i2.31978

Abstract


This research was conducted to obtain data and information regarding the analysis of complementary words of directions (Qūxiàng Bǔyǔ) 来 (Lái) and 去 (Qù) of Mandarin sentences in MAS An-Nuriyah Bontocini Jeneponto, grade XI. The type of this research used descriptive qualitative. The population in this study were 40 students of class XI MAS An-Nuriyah Bontocini Jeneponto consisting of 18 students of class XI science and 20 students of class XI social studies. The sample of this study was 18 students, and the sampling method was full sampling. The data of this study were obtained through an error analysis test of the complementary word of direction来 (Lái) and 去 (Qù) in Mandarin sentences of class XI Students of  MAS An-Nuriyah Bontocini Jeneponto. The data analysis used percentage technique with the results of the percentage analysis that 28%, it shows that the analysis of errors in the direction of complementary words of direction来 (Lái) and 去 (Qù) in of Mandarin sentences in MAS An-Nuriyah Bontocini Jeneponto, grade XI .


Full Text:

PDF

References


Faqih Ainun. 2019. Kesalahan Penggunaan Kata Pelengkap Arah 来 dan 去

PadaMahasiswa Angakatan 2016 Prodi Pendidikan BahasaMandarin Universitas Negeri Surabaya. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/230812182.pdf (di unduh pada tanggal 28 Januari 2021)

Mintowati, Maria. 2017. “Pembelajaran Bahasa Mandarin di Sekolah:

Pendekatan dan Metode Alternatif”, Jurnal Cakrawala Mandarin, (online),Vol.1, No.1,hlm.1. http://jurnalapsmi.org/index.php/CM/article/vi ew/ 25, (diunduh 27 Januari 2021).

Na Phuket, Pimpisa Rottanadilok. 2015. “Understanding EFL Students Errors

in Writing. Journal of Education and Practice”.Vol. 6, ISSN

- 2888.http://iiste.org.(diakses 09 Februari 2020).

Newman,W L. 1997. Social Research Methods Qualitative and Quantitative

Approache. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Pranowo,. 2014. Teori Belajar Bahasa. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.

Rullah, T Kasa. 2021. Analsisis Kesalahan Penggunaan Kata Negasi 不 dan 没

Dalam Kalimat Bahasa Mandarin Pada Mahasiswa Sastra

Cina USU. (diunduh pada tanggal 28Januari 2021)

Sibuea. 2010. Universitas Binus Gelar “Chinese Bridge”.

https://properti.kompas.com/read/2010/05/12/17054727/~Edukasi~News (diakses pada tanggal 18 februari 2021)

Subandi. 2008. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Lesson Study sebagai Upaya

Perbaikan Mutu Pendidikan Dasar (Implementasi di Jepang

dan di Indonesia). Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 9, No.

(diakses pada tanggal 08 Februari 2021)

Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suparto. 2002. Penggunaan Bahasa Mandarin yang Baik dan Benar. Jakarta: PT Grasindo

Tarigan, Henry Guntur dan Djago Tarigan. 2011. PengajaranAnalisis KesalahanBerbahasa. Bandung: Penerbit Angkasa Bandung.

Yongxin Zhao, Pauw Budianto. 2005. Intisari Tata Bahasa Mandarin. Bandug

Rekayasa Sains

丽萍姜. 2014. HSK 标准教程 3 课本. Jakarta : PT. Legacy Utama Kreasindo

伯荣黄,廖序东. 2007. Modern Chinese Volume [现代汉语（订四版）下册]

扫描版(ED2000.COM). Beijing : Gaodeng Jiayou Chubanse


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 320 times | PDF view : 62 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Wen Chuang




Published by:

Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Mandarin

Fakutas Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Universitas Negeri Makassar

Office:

Jalan Daeng Tata Raya Kec. Parangtambung Kota Makassar. Prop. Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia Email: wenchuang@unm.ac.id  Contact: +6281354525821

This is a website that publishes an open-access article distributed under Licensed Creative Commons License Creative Commons License the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.