Strategy for Enhancing the Performance Accountability of Enrekang Regency Government Agencies

Andi Waode Suastina; Nurman Sahar; Ramli Ramli

doi:10.26858/pdr.v6i1.42543

Strategy for Enhancing the Performance Accountability of Enrekang Regency Government Agencies

Andi Waode Suastina^(1*), Nurman Sahar⁽²⁾, Ramli Ramli⁽³⁾,

(1) State Development Administration Study Program STIA LAN Makassar Polytechnic, Indonesia
(2) State Development Administration Study Program STIA LAN Makassar Polytechnic, Indonesia
(3) State Development Administration Study Program STIA LAN Makassar Polytechnic, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/pdr.v6i1.42543

Abstract

In recent years the level of accountability for the performance of Enrekang Regency government agencies has not shown a significant increase, so a good strategy is needed to increase it. This study uses a qualitative approach with interpretive methods and literature studies. The aim of this research is to analyze the problems in implementing government agency performance accountability and from these findings we provide strategic recommendations in improving the government agency performance accountability system in Enrekang Regency. From the research we conducted in Enrekang District, we found several components that became weaknesses in the implementation of the performance accountability system for government agencies. These components were synchronization between planning documents, result-oriented performance planning, linkages between strategic plan documents and work plans, preparation of employee performance indicators, performance measurement. employees in stages, the use of performance measurement. In improving the performance accountability system for the Enrekang Regency government agencies with strategies to increase commitment, implement performance-based budgeting, foster the importance of the Government Agency Performance Accountability System, and improve the quality of APIP in Enrekang district.

Keywords

Accountability; Performance; Government.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Avery, E. J., Graham, M., & Park, S. (2016). Planning makes (closer to) perfect: exploring United States’ local government officials’ evaluations of crisis management. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 24(2), 73–81.

Bäck, H., Debus, M., Müller, J., & Bäck, H. (2013). Regional government formation in varying multilevel contexts: A comparison of eight European countries. Regional Studies, 47(3), 368–387.

Chen, D. (2017). “Supervision by public opinion” or by government officials? Media criticism and central-local government relations in China. Modern China, 43(6), 620–645.

Chua, S. C., & Oh, T. H. (2010). Review on Malaysia’s national energy developments: Key policies, agencies, programmes and international involvements. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(9), 2916–2925.

Doh, S., & Kim, B. (2014). Government support for SME innovations in the regional industries: The case of government financial support program in South Korea. Research Policy, 43(9), 1557–1569.

Getha-Taylor, H., & Morse, R. S. (2013). Collaborative leadership development for local government officials: Exploring competencies and program impact. Public Administration Quarterly, 71–102.

Hendriks, A.-M., Jansen, M. W. J., Gubbels, J. S., De Vries, N. K., Molleman, G., & Kremers, S. P. J. (2015). Local government officials׳ views on intersectoral collaboration within their organization–A qualitative exploration. Health Policy and Technology, 4(1), 47–57.

Hunnius, S., Paulowitsch, B., & Schuppan, T. (2015). Does E-Government education meet competency requirements? An analysis of the German university system from international perspective. 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2116–2123.

Minakov, V. F., Ilyina, O. P., & Lobanov, O. S. (2014). Concept of the cloud information space of regional government. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 21(1), 190–196.

Nawafleh, S., Obiedat, R., & Harfoushi, O. (2012). E-government between developed and developing countries. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning (IJAC), 5(1), 8–13.

Picazo-Vela, S., Fernández-Haddad, M., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2016). Opening the black box: Developing strategies to use social media in government. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 693–704.

Sahala Purba, Rintan Saragih, & Tika Meisiska Br Sembiring. (2022). Pengaruh Kompetensi Dan Sistem Pengendalian Internal Terhadap Akuntabilitas Pemerintah Desa Dalam Mengelola Alokasi Dana Desa. AKUA: Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 1(1), 122–129. https://doi.org/10.54259/akua.v1i1.140

Salem, R., Sompa, A. T., & Muharram, S. (2021). Urgency Analysis And Identification of Weaknesses In Implementation Of Accountability System Performance of Government Institutions (Sakip) Tanah Bumbu Regency 2015-2021. International Journal of Politic, Public Policy and Environmental Issues, 1(01), 16–24.

Setianto, T., Ningrum, S., & Muhafidin, D. (2021). Implementation of Government Performance Accountability System (SAKIP) in Indonesian Local Government (Case of Regional Development Planning Board of Sukabumi Regency). Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 5(1), 59–78.

Sharma, B., & Gadenne, D. (2011). Balanced scorecard implementation in a local government authority: Issues and challenges. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 70(2), 167–184.

Sternberg, R. (2014). Success factors of university-spin-offs: Regional government support programs versus regional environment. Technovation, 34(3), 137–148.

Sukimon, I. L., Salju, S., & Anwar, S. M. (2021). The Effect of Financial Report Quality and Human Resource Competence on the Implementation of SAKIP (Government Agencies Performance Accountability System). Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(3), 3742–3751.

Telabah, I. W. S., Hermanto, H., & Handajani, L. (2018). Implementation of performance accountability system for government institution (SAKIP): Determinants and consequence in local government. International Business and Accounting Research Journal, 2(2), 87–102.

wiwik adriani, I. R. & H. I. (2015). Penerapan Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (Sakip) dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance pada Politeknik Negeri Padang. Jurnal Akuntansi & Manajemen, 10, 51–60.