Feasibility Study of Independent Curriculum Implementation

Radenrara Sutaris

doi:10.26858/pdr.v6i1.36986

Feasibility Study of Independent Curriculum Implementation

Radenrara Sutaris^(1*),

(1) Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/pdr.v6i1.36986

Abstract

This research is a design research that aims to obtain an overview of the feasibility of implementing the Independent Curriculum (Indonesia: Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka / IKM). Feasibility of implementation can be seen from socialization, teacher commitment, learning system, support from school principals, readiness of education units and readiness of infrastructure. The results of the research carried out show that the IKM deserves to reach 74.79% and has a future. The feasibility of each element is 99.1% socialization, 74% teacher commitment, 84.51% learning system, school principal support, education unit readiness and 48% readiness of infrastructure. For the most feasible areas, the Provinces of Yogyakarta, Central Java and Bali are the areas that are most ready to implement IKM, and the provinces that are least ready are North Maluku, Papua. Based on the level, SD level is the most ready and feasible level for IKM implementation, then SMK (Indonesia: Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan), SMA (Indonesia: Sekolah Menengah Atas), SMP (Indonesia: Sekolah Menengah Pertama), SKB (Indonesia: Sanggar Kegiatan Belajar), SLB (Indonesia: Sekolah Luar Biasa) and finally PAUD (Indonesia: Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini).

Keywords

IKM; Independent Curriculum; Learning system

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdullah, A., & ZA, T. (2018). Orientation of Education in Shaping the Intellectual Intelligence of Children. Advanced Science Letters, 24(11), 8200–8204.

Aivazidi, M., & Michalakelis, C. (2021). education sciences Exploring Primary School Teachers ’ Intention to Use E-Learning Tools during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Brown, S., & Sessions, J. G. (1999). Education and employment status: a test of the strong screening hypothesis in Italy. Economics of education Review, 18(4), 397–404.

Dawson, S., Burnett, B., & O’Donohue, M. (2006). Learning communities: an untapped sustainable competitive advantage for higher education. International Journal of Educational Management.

Dewi, E. M. P. (2017). Teacher Psychological Readiness Analysis in the Implementation of Inclusive Education at Junior High School of 18 Malang. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 6(10), 1744–1746. https://doi.org/10.21275/16101707

Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3–4), 391–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.1999.9672075

Ellerani, P., & Gentile, M. (2013). The Role of Teachers as Facilitators to Develop Empowering Leadership and School Communities Supported by the Method of Cooperative Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 12–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.144

Hirst, P. H. (2010). Knowledge and the curriculum: A collection of philosophical papers. Routledge.

Kim, H. H.-S. (2015). School context, friendship ties and adolescent mental health: A multilevel analysis of the Korean Youth Panel Survey (KYPS). Social Science & Medicine, 145, 209–216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.002

Kools, M., Stoll, L., George, B., Steijn, B., Bekkers, V., & Gouëdard, P. (2020). The school as a learning organisation: The concept and its measurement. European Journal of Education, 55(1), 24–42.

Opara, J. A., & Oguzor, N. S. (2011). Inquiry instructional method and the school science curriculum. Current research journal of social sciences, 3(3), 188–198.

Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American educational research journal, 44(4), 921–958.

Sahade, S., & Ngampo, Y. A. (2021). Analysis of the Relevance Curriculum With the World of Work Needs and the World of Business. Kontigensi: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 9(2), 522–530.

Selamat, A., Alias, R. A., Hikmi, S. N., Puteh, M., & Tapsi, S. M. (2017). Higher education 4.0: Current status and readiness in meeting the fourth industrial revolution challenges. Redesigning Higher Education towards Industry, 4, 23–24.

Vu, T. L. A., & Le, T. Q. (2019). Development orientation for higher education training programme of mechanical engineering in industrial revolution 4.0: A perspective in Vietnam. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Research & Developments (JMERD), 42(1), 71–73.

Weng, C.-H., & Tang, Y. (2014). The relationship between technology leadership strategies and effectiveness of school administration: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 76, 91–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.010