EVALUASI BAHAN AJAR SENI RUPA DALAM BUKU SENI BUDAYA SEKOLAH MENENGAH PERTAMA

Tangsi Tangsi(1*), Sofyan Salam(2), Muh. Saleh Husain(3),

(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(3) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/njad.v9i1.74316

Abstract


This study aims to determine: (1) the accuracy of the concept of art teaching materials in the Cultural Arts book for Junior High Schools, (2) the accuracy of the pictures to explain the concept of art teaching materials in the Cultural Arts book for Junior High Schools. The focus of the study is the accuracy of the concepts and the accuracy of the pictures of art teaching materials in the Cultural Arts book for Junior High Schools. The subject of the research was the Cultural Arts book for Junior High Schools, which was published by the Ministry of National Education, Revised Edition, 2017. Data collection techniques used were observation, FGD, and documentation. The data analysis technique used is an interactive analysis model. The results showed that there were some misconceptions in art teaching materials in the Cultural Arts Book for Junior High Schools, including ambiguous definitions, incomplete material and incompatible with fine arts theory, causing confusion for students. In addition, some of the images used to clarify the concept are incorrect, not even in accordance with the theme to be explained. As a result, the image does not function as an explanatory concept / material, but instead instead obscures the concept

Keywords


Keakuran konsep; ketepatan gambar; bahan ajar seni rupa

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bates, A.W. (1995). Technology, Open Learning and Distance Education.

London: Rutledge.

Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 1995. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia; Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J.O. (2009). The systematic design of instructional. London: Pearson Education Ltd.

Hackbarth, S (1996); The Educational Technology Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide. New Jersey: Educational Technology Publication

Heinich, R., Molenda, M., & Russel, J.D. (1989). Instructional Media and

Technologies for Learning

Kemp, JE. Dan Dayton, DK. 1985. Planning and Producing Instruksional Media. Cambridge: Harper & Row Publishers, New York.

Krathwohl, David R. Metod Of Educational and Social Science. Research. 1993 Longman; New York.

Miles, Matthew, B. Huberman, A. Michael (Terj. Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi) 1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jakarta: UI Press.

Pannen, P. (1996). Mengajar di Perguruan Tinggi, buku empat, bagian

"Pengembangan Bahan Ajar". Jakarta: PAU-PPAI, Universitas Terbuka.

Reece, I & Walker, S (2000).Teaching, training & learning: A practical guide. Sunderland: Business Education Publisher Ltd.

Said, A.A. 2007. Desaian Dwi Matra. Makassar: Badan Penerbit UNM

Salam, S. 2017. Seni Ilustrasi. Makassar: Badan Penerbit UNM

Sukmadinata, N.S. 2009. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung (ID): PT. Remaja Rosda Karya.

Suparman, A (2004). Desain Instruksional. Proyek Pengembangan Universitas Terbuka Ditjen Dikti Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Jakarta: PAU-PPAI


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 13 times | PDF view : 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Dipublikasikan oleh:

Program Studi Pendidikan Seni Rupa PPs Universitas Negeri Makassar.

Alamat Jl. Bonto Langkasa Gunung Sari Makassar, 90222

Kampus PPs UNM Makassar, Indonesia. Email: ijad@unm.ac.id

Creative Commons License
Nuansa Journal of Arts and Design is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

NJAD indexed by