Carakde Class Learning Program from the Sigi Community: Evaluation for Improving Student Learning Outcomes

Andi Afrinaramadhani Hatta(1*), Ali Muhtadi(2),

(1) Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
(2) Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/est.v8i1.35581

Abstract


This study aims to determine the suitability of (1) context, (2) input, (3) process, and (4) product of Carakde class learning program carried out by Sahabat Indonesia Berbagi (SIGi Community) in Makassar Region based on predetermined success criteria. This research is an evaluation research with Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) approach model and uses quantitative research method. The population in this study is students of Carakde Class of 21 peoples. Sample in this study used purposive sampling. This research used analysis data, descriptive and inferensial statistic. The data analysis technique used statistic t-tes . After being analyzed using statistical formulas, it can be seen that student learning outcomes after the CIPP model evaluation applied. Besides, Context evaluation involves program objectives and program relevance to environmental needs. Input Evaluation encompasses environmental, instrumental, and raw input. This can be seen from  increase in the students' mean scores from pre-test and post-test results. Process evaluation covers the implementation of Carakde Class learning can be seen based on student learning outcomes. The mean value of the pre-test is 39, while the mean value of the post-test is 61.42.  From these calculations obtained thitung: 11.284 while ttable : 2,086 which means thitung > ttable. So that the alternative hypothesis Ha can be accepted and null hypothesis (Ho) is rejected. This means that student learning outcomes after the CIPP model evaluation is applied. Furthermore, product evaluation comprises the program graduates and the achievement of program objectives.

Keywords


context, input, process, product, evaluation, learning program.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arifin, Zainal. (2013). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Alexsandra1., Ganefri., & Usmedi. 2019. Evaluation of Vocational School Pratic Program CIPP Model. Journal. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation Volume 3, Number 3 Tahun 2019, pp. 180-184. Bali: Ejournal Undiksha.

Alvarez, K., Salas, E., & Garofano, C. M. (2004). An Integrated Model of Training Evaluation and Effectiveness. Human Resource Development Review, 3(4), 385-416. doi: 10.1177/1534484304270820.

Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan. (2016). Melalui Program GGD, Pemerintah Upayakan Pemerataan Pendidikan di Indonesia. litbang.kemdikbud.go.id (online).

Bahari, Agi. (2015). Melalui Program GGD, Pemerintah Upayakan Pemerataan Pendidikan di Indonesia. Kemendikbud: Jakarta.

Darmansyah. (2011). Strategi Pembelajaran Menyenangkan Dengan Humor. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Diana, Yus. (2016). Dilema Kaum Marjinal. Kompasiana (online).

Fadlillah, Muhammad. (2014). Desain Pembelajaran PAUD. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Hasibuan, S.P.M. (2011). Manajemen Dasar, Pengertian, dan Masalah. Jakarta: CV. Haji Masagung.

Kuo, L.H., Huei, M.W., Li, M. C., Ming, C. W., Miao, K.H., & Hung, J.Y. (2012). An Evaluation Model of Integrating Emerging Technology into Formal Curriculum. International. Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 6(3), 250-259.

Malcolm, J., Hodkinson, P., & Colley, H. (2003). The interrelationships between informal and formal learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15(7/8), 313–318.

Malik, Abdul. (1994). Non-Formal And Adult Education In India A Select Annotated Bibliography. Department Of Library And Information Science Aligarh Muslim University Aligarh: India.

Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation A System Approach Seventh Edition. USA: Sage Publication.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The use of experimental design in educational evaluation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 8(4), 267-274.

Sundoyo, H., T. Sumaryanto, & Dwijanto. (2012). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Sistem Ganda Berdasarkan Stake Countenance Model. Innovative Journal of Curriculum, 1(2), 69-73.

Sudjana, Djudju. (2006). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Luar Sekolah. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Suparman, Atwi. (2012). Desain Instruksion Modern. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout From Higher Education: A Theoretical Synthesis Of Recent Research. Review Of Education Research. Journal. 45, 89–125. USA: SAGE Publishing.

Tokmak, H.S., Baturay, H. M., & Fadde, P. (2013). Applying the Context, Input, Process, Product Evaluation Model for Evaluation, Research, and Redesign of an Online Master’s Program. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(3), 273-293. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1485

Topno, H. (2012). Evaluation of Training and Development: An Analysis of Various Models. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), 5(2), 16-22.

UNESCO and the Indian National Commission for Co-operation with UNESCO. 1964. Life Skills in Non-formal Education: USA.

Wati, E. R. (2016). Kupas Tuntas Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Kata Pena.

Weiss, M. J. (2010). The Implications Of Teacher Selection And The Teacher Effect In Individually Randomized Group Treatment Trials. Journal. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 3, 381–405. USA: SAGE Publishing.

Weiss, M. J., Mary G. Visher., Evan Weissman., & Heather Wathington. (2015). The Impact of Learning Communities for Students in Developmental Education: A Synthesis of Findings From Randomized Trials at Six Community Colleges. Journal. USA: SAGE Publishing.

Widoyoko, S. E. P. (2016). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Zhang, G., Nancy, Z., Robin, G., Debbie, M., Jennifer, W., Christine, S., & Katherine, M. (2011). Using the Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model (CIPP) as a Comprehensive Framework to Guide the Planning, Implementation, and Assessment of Service-learning Programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(4), 57-83.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 76 times | PDF view : 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Andi Afrinaramadhani Hatta

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Editorial Office

Journal of Educational Science and Technology
Graduate Program Universitas Negeri Makassar

   

address icon red

 Jl Bonto Langkasa Gunungsari Baru Makassar, 90222 Kampus PPs UNM Makassar Gedung AD Ruang 406 Lt 4, Indonesia  
  jurnalestunm@gmail.com | est.journal@unm.ac.id 
  https://ojs.unm.ac.id/JEST/index 
   085299898201 (WA) 
 

EST Index by: