Exploration of Creative Thinking Skills of Students in Physics Learning

Muhammad Asriadi(1*), Edi Istiyono(2),

(1) Yogyakarta State University
(2) Yogyakarta State University
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/est.v6i2.12737

Abstract


This study aims to determine the ability of creative thinking high school students in physics learning, know the form of assessment of creative thinking abilities. The study was conducted at SMAN 6 Yogyakrata. This type of research is a survey with a cross-sectional method that is a survey conducted once and at a time. The subjects were the principals, teachers of physics from SMAN 6 Yogyakrata and 30 grade XI students. observations, interviews, and questionnaires were used as data collection techniques. The data analysis method used was the quantitative-qualitative descriptive analysis. The results showed that the creative thinking ability of class XI MIA 1 students at SMAN 6 Yogyakarta can be said to be in the average and quite good category, although there are some students whose level of creative thinking ability is low. In addition, the form of assessment used by physics teachers has not been effective and accurate enough in assessing students 'creative thinking abilities. So it is recommended to use The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT) in physics learning because it has been proven to be accurate in assessing students' creative thinking abilities.


Keywords


Assessment, Creative Thinking, Physics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Angell, C., Guttersrud, ystein, Henriksen, E. K., & Isnes, A. (2004). Physics: Frightful, but fun. Pupils’ and teachers’ views of physics and physics teaching. Science Education, 88(5), 683–706. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10141

Ayob, A., Hussain, A., Mustafa, M. M., & Shaarani, M. F. A. S. (2011). Nurturing Creativity and Innovative Thinking through Experiential Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, 247–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.035

Ariyana, Yoki., Ari Pudjiastuti., Reisky Bestary., Zamroni, (2018) Buku Pegangan Pembelajaran Berorientasi pada Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. Jakarta : Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

Bacanlı, H., Dombaycı, M. A., Demir, M., & Tarhan, S. (2011). Quadruple Thinking: Creative Thinking. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 536–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.065

Ersoy, E., & Başer, N. (2014). The Effects of Problem-based Learning Method in Higher Education on Creative Thinking. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3494–3498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.790

Fardhila, R. R., & Istiyono, E. (2019). An assessment instrument of mind map product to assess students’ creative thinking skill. Research and Evaluation in Education, 5(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v5i1.22525

Flor, R. K., Bita, A., Monir, K. C., & Zohreh, Z. Z. (2013). The Effect of Teaching Critical and Creative Thinking Skills on the Locus of Control and Psychological Well-being in Adolescents. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 82, 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.223

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed). McGraw-Hill.

Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2017). Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. Thousand Oaks, California : SAGE Publications.

Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (2010). The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. USA:Cambridge University Press.

Klieger, Aviva & Sherman, Guy. (2015). Physics texbooks: do they promote or inhibit students’ creative thinking. Iopscience. https://doi.org/10.1088/00319120/50/3/305

Kurniawan, D. A., Astalini, A., Perdana, R., & Kurniawan, W. (2019). Identification Attitudes of Learners on Physics Subjects. Journal of Educational Science and Technology (EST), 5(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.26858/est.v5i1.8231

Lin, C.-S., & Wu, R. Y.-W. (2016). Effects of Web-Based Creative Thinking Teaching On Students’ Creativity and Learning Outcome. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1558a

Miller, A. L., & Dumford, A. D. (n.d.). The Influence of Institutional Experiences on the Development of Creative Thinking in Arts Alumni. Studies in Art Education, 56(2), 15.

Pada, A. U. T., Kartowagiran, B., & Subali, B. (2016). Separation index and fit items of creative thinking skills assessment. Research and Evaluation in Education, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v2i1.8260

Piaw, C. Y. (2014). Effects of Gender and Thinking Style on Student’s Creative Thinking Ability. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 5135–5139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1087

Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why Isn’t Creativity More Important to Educational Psychologists? Potentials, Pitfalls, and Future Directions in Creativity Research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1

Prasetiyo, A. D., Mubarokah, L., Pos, J. J. K., & Sidoarjo, K. (2014). Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Dalam Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Berdasar Masalah Matematika (Student’s Creative Thinking In The Application Of Mathematical Problems Based Learning). Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika STKIP PGRI Sidoarjo, Vol.2, No.1, Maret 2014. http://lppm.stkippgri-sidoarjo.ac.id/

Setiawan, Reski., Djemari Mardapi, Aman, Umum Budi Karyanto. Multiple Intelligences-based Creative Curriculum: The Best Practice. (2020). European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.611

Setiawan, R. (2017). The Influence of Income, Experience, and Academic Qualification on the Early Childhood Education Teachers’ Creativity in Semarang, Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 10(4), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1043a

Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2012). Making creative metaphors: The importance of fluid intelligence for creative thought. Intelligence, 40(4), 343–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2012.02.005

Srikoon, S., Bunterm, T., Nethanomsak, T., & Tang, K. N. (2018). Effect of 5P model on academic achievement, creative thinking, and research characteristics. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(3), 488–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.06.011

Trilling, B & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills learning for life in our time. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.

Wahyudi, W., Waluya, S. B., Suyitno, H., & Isnarto, I. (2019). The Use Of 3CM (Cool-Critical-Creative-Meaningful) Model In Blended Learning To Improve Creative Thinking Ability In Solving Mathematics Problem. Journal of Educational Science and Technology (EST), 5(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.26858/est.v5i1.7852

Yarbrough, N. D. (2016). Assessment of Creative Thinking Across Cultures Using the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT): Translation and Validity Issues. Creativity Research Journal, 28(2), 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1162571

Yusnaeni, Corebima, A. D., Susilo, H., & Zubaidah, S. (2017). Creative thinking of low academic student undergoing search solve create and share learning integrated with metacognitive strategy. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 245-262. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1138378.pdf


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 325 times | PDF view : 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Muh Asriadi Am, Edi Istiyono

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Editorial Office

Journal of Educational Science and Technology
Graduate Program Universitas Negeri Makassar

   

address icon red

 Jalan Bonto Langkasa Gunungsari Baru Makassar, 90222 Kampus PPs UNM Makassar Gedung AD Ruang 406 Lt 4, Indonesia  
  jurnalestunm@gmail.com | est.journal@unm.ac.id 
  https://ojs.unm.ac.id/JEST/index 
   085299898201 (WA) 
 

EST Index by: