IMPROVING STUDENT LEARNING RESULTS IN MATHEMATICAL LEARNING THROUGH SOMATIC, AUDITORY, VISUAL AND INTELLECTUAL APPROACH (SAVI)

Ovan Adohar; Ramlan Mahmud; Ruslan B

doi:10.26858/jds.v6i3.8532

IMPROVING STUDENT LEARNING RESULTS IN MATHEMATICAL LEARNING THROUGH SOMATIC, AUDITORY, VISUAL AND INTELLECTUAL APPROACH (SAVI)

Ovan Adohar^(1*), Ramlan Mahmud⁽²⁾, Ruslan B⁽³⁾,

(1) STKIP YPUP
(2)
(3)
(*) Corresponding Author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/jds.v6i3.8532

Abstract

This research was aimed to improve the Somatic, Auditory, Visual, and Intelectual (SAVI) approach to Grade Seven B (VII B) Bajiminasa. The Type of research used is classroom action research with classroom action research. The subject of this study was the students is class VIII Bajiminasa Makassar, South Sulawesi. of SMP Islam Sultan Agung 4 Semarang, Central Java. The writer analyzed the data with quantitative and qualitative approaches on learning outcomes. The resulth of the study showed that the Somatic, Audotory, Visual and Intelectual (SAVI) approach was complete and student learning outomes had increased. To complete and improve in learning outcomes, presumably provide special guidance and do not experience improvement

Keywords

Somatic, Auditory, Visual, Intelectual

Full Text:

PDF

References

Arikunto, S., Suhardjono, & Supardi. (2006). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Azhari, A. (1996). Psikologi Pendidikan. Semarang: Toha Putra.

Ersanghono, & dkk. (2008). Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe NHT Berbasis SAVI untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Kimia Pokok Bahasan Laju Reaksi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 2(1), 216-223.

Hamalik , O. (2001). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Bumi Aksara.

Hudojo, H. (1990). Teknik Belajar Matematika. Malang: IKIP Malang.

Johar, & dkk. (2011). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berfikir Tingkat Tinggi pada PelajaranAudiotory, Visual, Intelektual (SAVI). Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 3(2), 21-22.

Moleong, L. J. (2007). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

OECD. (2016, 12 19). PISA 2015 Results in Focus. Diambil kembali dari OECD Publicing: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-en (04 Oktober 2016)

Ovan, & Nugroho, S. E. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika ditinjau dari Metakognisi Siswa Pada Model PISA-CPS. UJMER, 6 (1), 93-98.

Ovan, Waluya, S. W., & Nugroho, S. E. (2018). Analysis mathematical literacy skills in terms of the students’metacognition on PISA-CPS model. ICMSE, 1(1), 1-6.

PISA. (2016). What Students Know and Can Do, Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science Volume I.

Ronnie, M. D. (2016). The Power of Emosional & Adversity Qoutien for Teachers. Jakarta: Hikmah.

Sabaruddin. (2000). Mengajar dan Belajar. Makassar: UNM.

Sari , W., Marwan , A., & Melvina. (2017). Pengaruh Pendekatan Savi (Somatic, Auditory, Visual, And Intelectual ) Dengan Menggunakan Media Education. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa (JIM) Pendidikan Fisika., 1(4), 108-113.

Soemanto , W. (2003). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Sudjana. (2005). Metoda Statistika. Bandung: Tatsito.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung : Alfabeta.

Suherman , E. (2003). Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung: JICA UPI.

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 288 times | PDF view : 56 times

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Publisher:

Magister Program of Mathematics Education

prostgraduate Universitas Negeri Makassar

ramlan.mm@unm.ac.id

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika Indexed by