Comparisson On The Effectiveness Of Cooperative Learning Model Of Numbered Heads Together (NHT) And Team Assisted Individualization(TAI) In Geometry

Ruslan Djaya(1*),

(1) SMPN 4 Gowa
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/jds.v1i2.3559

Abstract


The study is an experiment research which aims at examining (1) the implementation of cooperative learning model of TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) type and NHT (Numbered Head Together) type; (2) the effectiveness of learning model of TAI type based on the aspects of learning outcomes, students’ activity, and students’ response; (3) the effectiveness of learning model of NHT type based on the aspects of learning outcomes, students’ activity, and students’ response; and (4) the comparison on the effectiveness of cooperative learning model of TAI type and NHT type in Geometry of grade VII students at SMPN 4 Sungguminasa. The study was conducted in grade VII at SMPN 4 Sungguminasa in Gowa on the second semester of academic year 2012/2013. Samples were selected randomly and obtained two classes out of thirteen classes. The chosen classes implemented the TAI type and the other one implemented the NHT type in Geometry lesson. The effectiveness of learning which consisted of thee aspect, namely learning outcomes of students, learning activity of students, and students’ response were examined. The result of study reveal that (1) the implementation of cooperative learning model of TAI type in geometry was conducted well with the mean score 3.60; (2) the implementation of cooperative learning model of TAI type in Geometry was effective based on the aspects of a students’ learning outcomes with the mean score of post-test greater than the pre-test by 79.47 ≥ KKM and students’ mastery of the lesson was 88.89% ≥ 85%, b) students’ learning outcomes with the implementation of activity 3.24, and c) students’ response with the mean score  3.57 (positive category); (3) the implementation of cooperative learning model of NHT type was conducted well with the mean score of the implementation 3.69; (4) the implementation of cooperative learning model of NHT type was effective based on the aspect of a) students’ learning outcomes with the mean score of post-test was greater than pre-test by 78.64 ≥ KKM and students’ mastery of the lesson was 86.11% ≥ 85%, b) students’ response with the mean score 3.46; (5) based on the set effective criteria, it is confirmed that the geometry lesson by determining the circumstance and area of square and triangle and used in solving the problem on the implementation of cooperative learning model of TAI type is better than NHT type of grade VII students at SMP where the three aspects, namely students’ learning outcomes, students’ activity, and students’ response were better than the TAI type.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ansjar, Muhammad. 2009. 2 November. “Pelajaran Matematika Keliru Dipahami”. Kompas. hlm.12.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2009. Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan(edisi revisi). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Dahar Ratna Wilis. 1983. Teori-teori Belajar. Jakarta: Dirjen Dikti P2LPTK

Depdiknas, 2004, Pedoman Pengembangan Instrumen dan Penilaian. Jakarta Pusat, Pusat Kurikulum Depdiknas.

Dimyati dan Mujiono. 1999. Belajar dan Pembelajara. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Hudojo, Herman. 1990. Strategi Mengajar Belajar Matematika. Malanga: IKIP Malang.

Miller, Charles David, 1994. Mathematical Ideas. New York: Harper Collins College Publisher.

Nurdin, 2007. Model Pembelajaran Matematika yang Menumbuhkan Kemampuan Metakognitif untuk Menguasai Bahan Ajar. Disertasi tidak diterbitkan. Surabaya: PPs Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

---------, 2009. Model-model Pembelajaran Matematika (Modul Pendidikan dan Latihan Profesi Guru). Makassar: Penyelenggara Sertifikasi Guru Rayon 24 UNM.

Oemar Hamalik. 2006. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Silberman, Melvin L. 2006. Active Learning 101 Cara belajar siswa aktif. (diterjemahkan oleh Raisul Muttaqien). Bandung: Nusamedia

Slameto, 2010. Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya(Edisi Revisi). Jakarta. Rineka Cipta.

Slavin, R.E. 2005.Cooperative Learning: Teori, Riset dan Praktik. Terjemahan oleh Lita. 2009. Bandung: Nusa Media.

Sugiyono, 2008. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sudjana, Nana. 1989. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sukardi. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta:Bumi Aksara

Sukino dan Mangunsong W., 2006. Matematika untuk SMP Kelas VII. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Trianto, 2009. Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif Konsep Landasan, dan Implementasinya pada Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: Kencana.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 613 times | PDF view : 92 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Ruslan Djaya

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Publisher:

Magister Program of Mathematics Education

prostgraduate Universitas Negeri Makassar

ramlan.mm@unm.ac.id

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika Indexed by

 

 

 

 

 Creative Commons License
daya matematis: jurnal inovasi pendidikan matematika is licensed under a https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

View My Stats