Analysis of Numeracy Literacy Activities of PGSD Students Through Writing Mathematics A Month

Ema Butsi Prihastari(1*), Kastono Kastono(2),

(1) Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/jdm.v10i2.35282

Abstract


This study maps numeracy-based mathematics material through mathematics writing activities for 30 days. There are 4 (four) components of numeracy literacy, namely algebra, numbers, geometry and measurement, and data and uncertainty. This type of research is a case study with a qualitative descriptive approach. The research subjects are PGSD students in the fourth semester of the 2021/2022 Academic Year who have taken the Introduction to Basic Mathematics and Geometry and Measurement courses in elementary schools comprising of 3 classes. Data collection techniques use observation, interviews, and documentation with data analysis techniques, namely a) data collection, b) data condensation, c) data presentation, and d) data verification. To guarantee the correctness of the results of the study, techniques are carried out: a) the persistence of observers, which is carried out seriously and continuously and b) triangulation. The results of the study found that the material, that most students presented in mathematics writing activities was Geometry and Measurement with an average percentage of 46.5%, because it was found in many daily lives and was easy to describe in writing. Meanwhile, with an average percentage of 1.67% in Algebraic material which is the least written material for students because it requires accuracy in determining variables.


Keywords


literacy; numeracy; writing mathematics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Asriyati Nadjamuddin dan Evi Hulukati. (2022). Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Mahaiswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Maematika. Jurnal BasicEdu. 6(1). 987-996

Bartell, T.G. (2011). Caring, race, culture, and power: A research synthesis toward supporting mathematics teachers in caring with awareness. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education. 4(1),50-74

Bodgan & Taylor. (1992). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Terjemahan oleh Arief Rurchan . Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.

Clemens M. Lechner. (2021). Stability and change in adults’literacy and numeracy skills: Evidence from two large-scale panel studies. Personality and Individual Differences. Volume 180, October. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110990

Gregg G. Van Ryzin. 1995. Cluster analysis as a basis for purposive sampling of project in case study evaluations. Evaluation Practice. Volume 16 (2). Pages 109-119

Guba &Lincoln. (1994). Handbooks of Qualitative Research. Sage Publication. London;

Hasibuan, E.K. (2018). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Matematika Siswa pada Pokok Bahasan BAngun Ruang Sisi Datar di SMP Negeri 12 Bandung. AXIOM: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. 7(1). Hal 18-30

Huacong Liu, Frank Fernandez, dan Gregor Dutz. (2022). Educational attainment, use numeracy at work, and gender wage gaps: Evidence from 12 middle-income countries. International Journal of Educatioan Development. Volume 92, July 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102625

Irawan, A. (2016). Peranan Kemampuan Numerik Dan Verbal Dalam Berpikir Kritis Matematika Pada Tingkat Sekolah Menengah Atas. AdMathEdu : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Ilmu Matematika Dan Matematika Terapan. 6(2). https://doi.org/10.12928/admathedu.v6i2.5443

Kathryn S. McCarthy, et all. (2022). On the basis of source: Impact of individual differences on multiple-document integrated reading and writing tasks. Learning and Instruction. Volume 79, June. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101599

Kemendikbud. (2017). Materi Pendukung Literasi Numerasi. Jakarta: Kemendikbud

Lange, J. De. (2006). Mathematical Literacy For Living From OECD-PISA. Tsukuba Journal of Educational Study in Mathematics. 25, 13–35.

Michael J. Rouse & Lina R. Bader. (2019). Dynamic Relationship Between Education, Regulation, and Practice: Case Studies and Examples. Encyclopedia of Pharmacy Practice and Clinical Pharmacy. Pages 239-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812735-3.00133-3

Miles,M.B, Huberman,A.M, dan Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Sourcebook, Edition 3. USA: Sage Publications. Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohindi Rohidi, UI-Press.

Moretti, G. A. S. & Frandell, T. (2013). Literacy from a Right to Education Perspective. Report of the Director General of UNESCO to the United Nations General Assembly 68th Session

N.K.E. Muliastrini. 2020. New Literacy Sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar di Abad 21. PENDASI: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia. 4(1). Februari. Hal 115-125

Nikola Erceg, Zvonimir Galic, Andreja Bubic. (2022). Normative responding on cognitive bias tasks: Some evidence for a weak rationality factor that is mostly explained by numeracy and actively open-minded thinking. Intelligence. Volume 90 January-February 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2021.101619

Ojose, B. (2011).Mathematics Literacy: Are WE Able to Put The Mathematics We Learn Into Everyday Use?. Journal of Mathematics Education. Vol. 4 (1). Pages 89-100

Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran. (2020). Desain Pengembangan Soal AKM. Diakses dari: https://pusmenjar.kemdikbud.go.id/akm/

Richard Murnane, Isabel Sawhill, & Catherine Snow. (2012). Literacy Challenges for the Twenty-First Century: Introducing the Issue. The Future of Children. Princeton-Brookings. Volume 22 Number 2.

Robert K. Yin. (2014). Studi Kasus: Desain dan Metodi. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindi Persada; Liz Taylor, 2020. Case Studies. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (second Edition). Pages. 95-100;

St Clair, R. (2020). What we do with words, and what they do with us. Literacy and Numeracy Studies, 27(1), 1– 6. https://doi.org/10.5130/lns.v27i1.6959

Steen, L., & Turner, R.,. (2007). Developing Mathematical Literacy. In Blum, W., Galbraith, P., Henn, H-W., & Niss, M (Eds), Modeling and Aplication in Mathematics Education- The 14th ICMI Study (pp. 285 - 294). New York: Springer

Subanji. (2015). Peningkatan Pedagocical Content Knowledge Guru Matematika dan Praktiknya dalam Pembelajaran Melalui Model Pelatihan TEQIP. JIP: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. 2(1). Hal. 71-79

Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta

Valerie F. Reyna, et all. (2009). How many Influences Risk Comprehension and Medical Decision Making. Psychol Bull.135 (6) pages. 943-973, doi: 10.1037/a0017327

Walle, V. D., John, A. (1994). Elementary School Mathematics. New York: Longman.

Yolanda, F. dan Wahyuni, P. (2020). Peningkatan Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis Mahasiswa Melalui Pembelajaran Matematika Kontekstual. ANARGYA: Jurnal ILmiah Pendiidkan Matematika. 3(1). Hal. 1-7


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 111 times | PDF view : 38 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Ema Butsi Prihastari

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Publisher:

Magister Program of Mathematics Education

prostgraduate Universitas Negeri Makassar

ramlan.mm@unm.ac.id

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika Indexed by

  

  

 

 Creative Commons License
daya matematis: jurnal inovasi pendidikan matematika is licensed under a https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

View My Stats