Differences in Mathematical Communication Ability Using Discovery Learning and Conventional Learning Models

Widyanti Astari(1*), Slamet Soro(2),

(1) University Of Muhammadiyah Prof.Dr.Hamka, Indonesia
(2) University Of Muhammadiyah Prof.Dr.Hamka, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/jdm.v10i2.34844


The aims of this research to see the differences in mathematical communication ablility using discovery learning models and conventional learning models and see whether the use of discovery learning models and conventional learning models affects students' mathematical communication abilities.  The sample of this research was 70 learners from two different classes who were randomly selected with purposive sampling techniques. The selected class is used as an experimental class using the discovery learning model and other classes as a control class using a conventional learning model. The data in this research were obtained from the results of the initial test and the final test of mathematical communication ability carried out before and after learning. The data will be analyzed using homogeneity test, normality test, independent sample T-test and paired T-test. The research conducted shows that: (1) The learning model applied to each class can have an influence on mathematical communication abilities. This is evidenced by the increase in the final test results given after learning (2) a learning model that allows students to actively participate in learning activities is not necessarily better than conventional learning models. This is shown by the similarity between the final test scores of the experimental class and the control class.


Communication Mathematics Ability; Discovery Learning; Conventional Learning

Full Text:



Asmara, R., & Afriansyah, EA (2018). Differences in Students' Mathematical Communication Ability Improvement between Eliciting Activities and Discovery Learning Models. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education , 4 (2), 78. https://doi.org/10.24014/sjme.v4i2.5714

Daulay, LA, Hakim, H., & Sartikawati, LD (2019). THE IMPROVEMENT OF STUDENT'S MATHEMATICAL COMMUNICATION ABILITY BY USING COOPERATIVE LEARNING: COURSE REVIEW HORAY. Journal of Tarbiyah , 26 (1), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.30829/tar.v26i1.376

Firdiani, NH, Herman, T., & Hasanah, A. (2020). Gender and mathematical communication abilities. Journal of Physics: Conference Series , 1521 (032095), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032095

Friani, IF, Sulaiman, & Mislinawati. (2017). Teacher Constraints in Applying Learning Models to Thematic Learning based on the 2013 Curriculum at SD Negeri 2 Banda Aceh City. Scientific Journal of Elementary School Teacher Education FKIP Unsyiah , 2 (1), 88–97.

Ikhsan, F., Pramudya, I., & Subanti, S. (2020). AN ANALYSIS OF MATHEMATICAL COMMUNICATION SKILLS. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET) , 7 (4), 1300–1307.

Jarwan. (2018). The Effect of Discovery Learning on Students' Problem Solving and Mathematical Communication Ability. Proximal , 1 (2), 77–89.

Khairunnisa, GF, Malang, UI, Maulyda, MA, & Hijriani, L. (2020). Mathematics Communication : Translation of Elementary Students' Idea. Numerical: Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education , 4 (2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.25217/numerical.v4i2.781

Kharismawati, LRS, Nirwansyah, Fauziah, S., Puspita, RA, Gasalba, RA, & Rabbani, TAS (2020). HOTS-Oriented Module: Discovery Learning (1st ed.). SEAMEO QITEP in Language.

Maulida, AH, Ningsih, MF, & Bastian, T. (2018). The Influence of Discovery Learning Model on Mathematical Communication Ability and Learning Activity of Junior High School Students. Delta: Scientific Journal of Mathematics Education , 6 (1), 47. https://doi.org/10.31941/delta.v6i1.649

Nasrum, A. (2018). DATA NORMALITY TEST FOR RESEARCH. In Jayapangus Press (pp. 1–117).

Nuryadi, Astuti, TD, Utami, ES, & M. Budiantara. (2017). Fundamentals of Research Statistics (1st ed.). SIBUKU MEDIA. http://lppm.mercubuana-yogya.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Buku-Ajar_Dasar-Dasar-Statistik-Penelitian.pdf

Warinangin, A., Barus, H., & Gulo, R. (2020). Differences in Student Learning Outcomes Who Are Taught With Elaboration Learning Models With Conventional Learning Models. Journal of Research Physicists , 3 (1), 43–50. http://jurnal.darmaagung.ac.id/index.php/jurnalpenelitianfisiawan/article/view/452


Setyawan, DA (2021). Practical Instructions for Normality Test & Data Homogeneity Test with SPSS. In Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents (1st ed.). Media Group's throne.

Tiffany, F., Surya, E., Panjaitan, A., & Syahputra, E. (2017). ANALYSIS OF MATHEMATICAL COMMUNICATION SKILLS STUDENT AT THE GRADE IX JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL. Ijariie , 3 (2), 2160–2164. http://usnsj.com/index.php/JME/article/view/2.2.45-51%0D

Triana, M., Zubainur, CM, & Bahrun, B. (2019). Students' Mathematical Communication Ability through the Brain-Based Learning Approach using Autograph. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education) , 4 (1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v4i1.6972

Untari, DDT (2018). Research Methodology (I). CV. Editor's Persada Pen.

Usmadi. (2020). Testing Requirements Analysis (Test of Homogeneity and Test of Normality). Educational Innovation , 7 (1), 50–62.

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 237 times | PDF view : 74 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2022 Widyanti Astari, Slamet Soro

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.



Magister Program of Mathematics Education

prostgraduate Universitas Negeri Makassar

[email protected]


Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika Indexed by





 Creative Commons License
daya matematis: jurnal inovasi pendidikan matematika is licensed under a https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

View My Stats