COMPARISON BETWEEN THE DISCOVERY LEARNING MODEL BASED LEARNING AND PROBLEM BASED LEARNING USING SCIENTIFIC APPROACH

. Syarifuddin(1*),

(1) UNM
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/jds.v5i1.3029

Abstract


This study aimed to compare the mathematics learning outcomes eighth grade students of SMP Negeri 5 Pallangga Gowa taught through Discovery Learning Based Learning and Problem Based Learning Using Scientific Approach to the material opportunities. This type of research is a research experiment. The subjects were students of class VIII.A and VIII.B SMP Negeri 5 Pallangga Gowa in the second semester of the 2014/2015 school year numbered 80 people consisting of 40 people in each group. Data collected consist of data of student learning outcomes and student response data to the device and learning. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential analysis. Descriptive Research data show learning outcomes of students who are taught by the teaching model of Discovery-based learning using a scientific approach is at the high category with an average of 82.42 with a standard deviation of 6.09 from the ideal score of 100. The average value of gain 0.75 with a standard deviation of 0.06 of an ideal score of 1 at the high category, and learning outcomes classical completeness of 87.5%, while the response is in the category of students with more positive with an average of 3.29. Learning outcomes of students taught by teaching model Problem-based learning using a scientific approach at the high category with an average of 87.00 with a standard deviation of 7.06 from the ideal score of 100. The average value gain of 0.82 with a standard deviation 0.07 of an ideal score of 1 at the high category, and classical completeness learning outcomes by 95%, while the response is in the category of students with more positive with an average of 3.48. Descriptive mastery learning outcomes and student response is different. Testing the hypothesis of the differences in the results of learning is done by using independent test samples t test with SPSS 20 for significant learning outcomes with a value of α = 0.05 and for normalized gain significant value to the value of α = 0.05. It can be concluded there is a difference in response and student learning outcomes are taught through discovery learning model based learning and problem based learning model study using a scientific approach in class VIII SMP Negeri 5 Pallangga

Keywords


Discovery Learning; Problem Based Learning; Scientifiec approach

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ardin. 2012. Efektivitas pembelajaran matematika realistik setting kooperatif tipe NHT dapat menjadi solusi dari permasalahan dalam pembelajaran matematika di kelas X SMAN 1 Kulisusu.

Arif Tiro, 2008.Dasar-Dasar Statistika. Makassar : Andira Publisher.

Arif Tiro dkk. 2013. Metode Ellips Dalam Analisis Data Kuantitatif. Makassar : Andira Publisher.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Aunurrahman,. 2013. Belajar dan Pembejaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Badudu. 1996. Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Carin, A.A. & Sund, R.B. 1975. Teaching Science trough Discovery, 3rd Ed. Columbus: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.

Ismail, dkk. 2000. Kapita Selekta Pembelajaran Matematika. Jakarta: UT.

Jamil S. 2014. Strategi Pembelajaran. Jogjakarta : Ar-ruzz Media.

Kemendikbud. 2013. Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Pusbangprodik.

Murtadho, Sutrisman dan Tambunan, G. 2003. Pengajaran Matematika. Jakarta: Karunika.

Nasution, S. 2010. Berbagai Pendekatan dalam proses Belajar dan Mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

NK, Roestiyah. 2001. Masalah-masalah Ilmu Keguruan. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.

Nur, M & Wikandari, P.R. 2000. Pengajaran Berpusat Kepada Siswa dan Pendekatan Konstruktivis dalam Pengajaran. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya University Press.

Redhana, I Wayan, 2010. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Peta Argumen Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa pada Topik Laju Reaksi. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 43(17),141-148.

Ridwan A.S. 2014. Pembelajaran Saintifik. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.

Risnawati. 2011. Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Matematika Melalui Model Pembelajaran Advance Organizer dengan Peta Konsep pada Siswa Kelas IX SMP N 2 Sinjai Tengah. Tesis. PPs UNM.

Rudolph, J.L. 2005. Epistemology for the masses: The origins of the scientific method in American schools. History of Education Quarterly, 45, 341-376.

Rusman. 2013. Model-Model Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Slameto. 2010. Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Sugiyono, 2011 Metode Penenlitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suyatno. 2009. Menjelajah Pembelajaran Inovatif. Surabaya: Masmedia Buanam Pustaka.

Utami Munandar, 2009. Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 523 times | PDF view : 336 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 . Syarifuddin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Publisher:

Magister Program of Mathematics Education

prostgraduate Universitas Negeri Makassar

ramlan.mm@unm.ac.id

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika Indexed by

 

 

 

 

 Creative Commons License
daya matematis: jurnal inovasi pendidikan matematika is licensed under a https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

View My Stats