COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVINESES OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL BETWEEN TPS-NHT TYPE AND TPS-TGT TYPE IN MATHEMATICS LEARNING IN CLASS VIII AT SMPN 1 MAKASSAR

Andi Aras(1*),

(1) UNM
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/jds.v4i3.2925

Abstract


The study is experiment research which aims at: (1) describing the effectiveness of cooperative learning model of TPS-NHT type in Mathematics learning in classVIII at SMPN 1 in Makassar; (2) describing the effectiveness of cooperative learning model of TPS-TGT type in Mathematics learning in classVIII at SMPN 1 in Makassar; (3) discovering the comparison of the effectiveness of cooperative learning model between TPS-NHT type and TPS-TGT type in Mathematics learning in class VIII at SMPN 1 in Makassar. The population of the research was all of class VIII students at SMPN 1 in Makassar of academic year 2016/2017 and the samples consisted of two classes, namely class VIII.4 taught by cooperative learning model of TPS-NHT type and class VIII.5 taught by cooperative learning model of TPS-TGT type taken by employing cluster random sampling technique. The data which were collected consist of the students’ learning results, the students’ learning motivations, the students’ activities during the learning process and the students’ responses toward the implementation of learning model. The results of the research reveal that the score of Mathematics learning result of class VIII.4 students is in high category with the mean 83.85 and standard deviation 11.51, classical completeness is 85%, the average of normalized gain is in high category, the average score of students’ learning motivation is in high category, the average of normalized gain of learning motivation is ini medium category, the students’ activity in following the learning process is ini good category, and the students’responses toward the implementation of cooperative learning model of TPS-NHT type is positive. In general, it can be concluded that cooperative learning model of TPS-NHT type is effective to be implemented in Mathematics learning in class VIII.4 at SMPN 1 in Makassar. The score of Mathematics learning result of class VIII.5 students’is in high category with the mean 80.15 and standard deviation 9.79, classical completeness is 82.5%, the average of normalized gain is in high category, the average score of the students’ learning motivation is in high category, the average of normalized gain of learning motivation is in medium category, the students’ activity in following the learning process is in good category, and the students’ responses toward the implementation of cooperative learning model of TPS-TGT type is positive. In general, it can be concluded that cooperative learning model of TPS-TGT type is effective to be implemented in Mathematics learning in class VIII.5 at SMPN 1 in Makassar. The result of hypothesis test at the significant level α = 0.05 with t-test shows that H0 is accepted meaning that there is no difference of learning effectiveness between the students’ who were taught by using cooperative model of TPS-NHT type and the students’ who were taught by using cooperative model TPS-TGT type in Mathematics learning on SPLDV material in class VIII at SMPN 1 in Makassar

Keywords


Effectiveness, Cooperative Learning Model, TPS-NHTType, and TPS-TGT Type

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adam, Barragato. 2015. Think/ Pair/ Share and Variations. Central Michigon University: Faculty Center for Innovative Teaching.

Adeneye., Alfred., & Samuel Adejare. 2012. Achievement in Cooperative versus Individualistic Goal-Structured Junior Secondary School Mathematics Classrooms in Nigeria. International Journal of Mathematics Trends and Technology- Volume3 Issue1

Arends, Ricards. 1998. Eksploring Teaching an Intruduction to Education. New York: McGraw-Hill

Azlina, N.A.N. (2010). CETLs: Supporting Collaborative Activities Among Students and Teachers Through the Use of Think-Pair-Share Techniques. IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science. 7 (5), Juli 2016.

Baker, Paul, Daniel. 2013. The Effects of Implementing The Cooperative Learning Structure, Numbered Heads Together In Chemistry Closses At A Rural Low Performing High School. A Thesis. Louisiana: B.S Lousiana State University.

Brophy, J. (2004). Motivation students to learn (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Cohen, R.J., & Swedlik M.E. (2005). Psychological testing and assessment: an introduction to test and measurement (6th ed.). New York. McGraw-Hill Companies.

Effandi, Zakaria. 2007. Promoting Cooperatif Learning In Science and Mathematics Education: A Malaysian Perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(1), hal. 35-39 (www.ejmste.com. Diakses 20 Juli 2016).

Firdha Razak. 2016. The Effect of Cooperatif Learning on Mathematics Learning Outcomes Viewed from Students’ Learning Motivation. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education ISSN: 2503-3697 (Print) Vol. 1, No. 1, 49-55, January 2016 http://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/jramathedu, Diakses 23 Juli 2016).

Fitriyanto, Herry. 2014. The Effectiveness Team Games Tournament (TGT) Technique on Students’ Mastery of Simple Past Tense. Unpublished A Thesis. Jakarta: State Islamic University Jakarta.

Grabowski, Barbara, dan Fengfeng, K. 2007. Gameplaying for maths learning: cooperative or not?. British Journal of Educational Technology. vol. 38, no. 2, hlm. 249-259.

Hayes, J. (2002). Interpersonal skills: goal-directed behavior at work. New York: Routledge.

Hook, P. & Vass, A. (2001). Creating Winning classroom. London: Davis Fulton Publishers.

Killen, R. (2009). Effective teaching strategies: lessons from research and practice (5th ed.). South Melbourne: Cengage Learning Australia.

Koenig, J.A. (2011). Assessing 21st century skills: summary of a workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Kyriacou, C. (2009). Effective teaching in schools (3rd ed). London: Stanley Thornes.

Santrock, J.W. (2011). Educational psychology (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Sardiman. 2010. Interaksi dan motivasi belajar mengajar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Slavin. R., E. 2005. Cooperative Learning Teori, Riset dan Praktik. Bandung: Nusa Media.

Sudjana. 1995. Metode Statistika. Bandung: Tarsito.

Sugiarto. 2012. Teknik Sampling, Gramedia, Jakarta

Uno, H. B. 2010. Teori motivasi dan pengukurannya analisis di bidang pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi askara.

Wheeler, P.A. (2005). The importance of interpersonal skills. http://www.alexcelgroup.com/articles/The%20Importance%20of%20Interpersonal%20Skills.pdf. Diunduh Pada Tanggal 21 Juni 2016


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 569 times | PDF view : 222 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Andi Aras

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Publisher:

Master Program of Mathematics Education

Graduate Program of Universitas Negeri Makassar

[email protected]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika Indexed by:

 

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License..

View My Stats