Profile of Creativity in Mathematical Problem Solving in terms of Self-Efficacy and Gender
(1) Universitas Pancasakti Makassar
(2) Universitas Pancasakti Makassar, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/jdm.v9i3.27412
Abstract
This research is a qualitative research that aims to determine the profile of creativity in solving mathematical problems in terms of self-efficacy and gender in class X SMKN 4 Bone. The subjects in this study were X students of SMKN 4 Bone Pinrang which consisted of 4 subjects namely one male with high self-efficacy, one female with high self-efficacy, one male with low self-efficacy and one female with high self-efficacy. - low efficacy. The instrument used is the researcher himself as the main instrument assisted by self-efficacy tests, math problem solving tests and interviews designed to suit creativity. Data was collected by means of task analysis and interviews. The collected data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis techniques. The results of the study show that: 1) the profile of creativity in solving math problems of high self-efficacy male students are: a) at the stage of formulating problems, high self-efficacy male students are able to interpret the problem by illustrating what is known in the form of pictures according to their understanding through writing. b) at the stage of planning problem solving, high self-efficacy male students are able to plan appropriate ideas or methods that will be used to answer the given problem, c) at the stage of generating problems, self-efficacy male students students with high self-efficacy are able to do calculations through ideas or previously planned methods. 2) the profile of creativity in solving mathematical problems of female students with high self-efficacy are: a) at the stage of formulating problems, female students with high self-efficacy are able to collect and organize information to understand problems according to their understanding through writing, b) at the stage of planning problem solving, female students with high self-efficacy are able to plan ideas or appropriate methods that will be used to answer problems, c) at the stage of producing, female students with high self-efficacy are able to answer problems through ideas that are planned as before. 3) the profile of creativity in solving mathematical problems of male students with low self-efficacy are: a) at the stage of formulating problems, male students with low self-efficacy are able to collect and organize information to understand the problem, b) at the planning stage, students boys with low self-efficacy are able to plan ideas, c) at the stage of generating, male students with low self-efficacy are able to do the correct calculations through formulas or previously planned methods. 4) the profile of creativity in problem solving in female students with low self-efficacy: a) at the stage of formulating, women with low self-efficacy do not understand the problem as a whole because they only quote the information written in the questions, b) at the planning stage, women with low self-efficacy has not been able to plan the right ideas or methods that will be used to answer the given problems, c) at the generating stage, women with low self-efficacy are not able to do calculations correctly through ideas or methods. pre-planned way.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abra, J. & French, S. V. 1991. Gender Differences in Creative Achievement: A Survey of Explanatnions. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 117(3): 235-284.
Aizikovitsh, U. E. 2014. The Extent of Mathematical Creativity and Aesthetics in Solving Problems among Students Attending the Mathematically Talented Youth Program. Creative Education, 5, 228-241.
Alimuddin, 2009. Menumbuhkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Melalui Tugas-Tugas Pemecahan Masalah. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA Fakultas MIPA, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 16 Mei 2009. M-356.
Alimuddin, 2012. Proses Berpikir Kreatif Mahasiswa Calon Guru Kreatif Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Gender. Disertasi Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Surabaya (UNESA): Tidak Dipublikasikan.
Arnol, J.A. & O’Connor,K.M. (2006) How Negotiator Self-Efficacy Drivers Decisions to Pursue Mediation.Journal of Applied Social psychology, 36, 11, 2649-2669.
Arsyad, Nurdin. 2016. Model Pembelajaran Menumbuhkembangkan kemampuan Metakognitif. Makassar: pustaka Refleksi.
Chuang, C. F., Shiu, S. C., & Cheng, C. J. (2010). The Relation of College Students' Process of Study and Creativity: The Mediating Effect of Creative Self-Efficacy. World Academy of Science, Enginering and Technology, 960-963.
Fakih, Mansour. 2004. Analisis Gender dan Transformasi Sosial. Pustaka Pelajar, Jakarta
Geary, D. C. et.all. 2000. Sex Differences in Spatial Cognition, Computational Fluency, and Arithmetical Reasoning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77: 337-353
Godchild, S. & Granholm, B.2007. An Exploratory Studyof Mathematics Result: What is the Gender Effect? International of Science and Mathematics education,7: 161-182
Hightower, M.W. 2003. The “Boy-Turn” in Research on Gender and Education. Review of Educational Research. 73: 471-498.
John M. Echols, & Hassan Shadily. 1995. Kamus Inggris – Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia Putaka Utama.
Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia.2005.Jakarta:Balai Pustaka
Kasiati, M. As’ad Djalali., Diah, Sofiah. (2012). Pola asuh orangtua demokratis, efikasi-diri dan kreativitas remaja. Jurnal Psikologi Persona, 1(1).
Kisti, Hepy Hapsari & Fardana N, Nur Ainy. 2012 . Hubungan Antara Self Efficacy dengan Kreativitas Pada Siswa SMK. Jurnal Psikologi Klinis dan Kesehatan Mental, Vol 1 No 02
Krulik, J & Rudnik ,J. A 1988. Problem Solving a Handbook for Elementary school Teachers. Temple University. USA
Lau, S. & Li, W.L. (1996). Peer status and perceived creativity: Are popular children viewed by peers and teachers as creative? Creativity Research Journal, 9(4), 347-352
Munandar, Utami. 2012. Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Cetakan ke-3. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Rahmawati, dkk. 2015. Profil Sswa SMP dalam Pemecahan Masalah yang Berkaitan dengan Literasi matematika Ditinjau dari Adversity Quatient (AQ). Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran . Vol. 3, No. 5. ISSN: 2339.1685Surakarta: FKIP UNS.
Sandtrock, John W. 2011. Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana
Siswono, Tatag Yuli Eko. 2008. Model Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Pengajuan dan Pemecahan Masalah untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif. Surabaya : Unesa University Press
Solso, dkk. 2008. Psikologi Kognitif. Jakarta: Erlangga
Solso, R.L, Maclin., O.H., & Maclin M.K. 2007. Psikologi Kognitif, Edisi Kedelapan. Jakarta: Erlangga
Solso, Robert L.. 1995. Cognitive Psychology. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon. Someren, Maarten W. van, Yvonne F. Barnard, dan Jacobijn A.C. Sandberg.1994. The Think Aloud Method: A Pratical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes. London: Academic Press.
Sriraman, Bharath. 2004. The Craracteristics of Mathematical Creativity. The Mathematics Educator Journal.Vol. 14, No. 1, 19-34.
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 243 times | PDF view : 72 timesRefbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Asmaul Husnah Amri, Suryanti Suryanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Publisher:
Magister Program of Mathematics Education
prostgraduate Universitas Negeri Makassar
ramlan.mm@unm.ac.id
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika Indexed by
daya matematis: jurnal inovasi pendidikan matematika is licensed under a https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/