The Effectiveness Of Scientific Approach With Open-Ended Problem Based Learning Worksheet Viewed From Learning Achievement, Creative Thinking Ability, Interest, And Mathematics Self-Efficacy

Lisda Fitriana Masitoh(1*), Enggar Prasetyawan(2),

(1) Universitas Pamulang
(2) Universitas Pamulang
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/jds.v7i3.11874

Abstract


This study aimed to describe the effectiveness and differences of scientific approach with open-ended problem based learning worksheet and scientific approach. The population in this study was students of class VII of SMP Negeri 17 Pamulang, South Tangerang. The sample of this study was determined randomly. They were two classes and the results were VII.3 and VII.4. To determine the effectiveness, one sample t-test was used. To discover the difference of effectiveness, MANOVA (Hotteling's Trace) test was used. The results show that (1) Scientific approach with open-ended problem based learning worksheet and scientific approach are effective viewed from learning achievement, creative thinking ability, interests and mathematic self-efficacy (2) There is no difference in effectiveness between scientific approach with open-ended problem based learning worksheet with scientific approach viewed from learning achievement, creative thinking ability, interests and mathematic self-efficacy (3) Scientific approach with open-ended problem based learning worksheet are more effective than scientific approaches viewed from student achievement

Keywords


Creative thinking, interest, open-ended, problem based leraning, self-efficacy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ali, R., et al. (2010). Effect of using problem solving method in teaching mathematics on the achievement of mathematics students. Asian Social Science, 6 (2), 66-72.

Ali, M. (2010). Mengukur kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis. Dipresentasikan dalam Konferensi Nasional Matematika XV. Manado: UNIMA.

Arends, R. I., & Kilcher, A. (2010). Teaching for student learning: Becoming an accomplished teacher. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.

Azwar, S. (2015). Tes prestasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Chakrabarty, S., & Muhamed, N. (2013). Problem based learning: Cultural diverse students’ engagement, learning and contextualized problem solving in a mathematics class. Wcik E-Journal of Integration Knowledge, 38-49.

Crow, L. D., & Crow, A. (1977). Psikologi pendidikan. (Terjemahan Drs. Z. Kasijan). New York, NY: American Book Company. (buku asli diterbitkan tahun 1954).

Erny., Shaleh, H. & Wahyu, W. (2017). Pengaruh Pendekatan Saintifik Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Dan Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa Kelas X IPA SMA Negeri 1 Kepahiang. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 2 (1), 12-38.

Fahriza, N & Winda, A. (2016). Hasil Belajar Matematika Dan Tingkat Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMP Dalam Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Yang Terintegrasi Pendekatan Saintifik. Math Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2 (3), 171-181.

Fast, L. A., et. al. (2010). Self-efficacy and standardized test performance. Diakses tanggal 22 April 2019 dari http://rap.ucr.edu/efficacy.pdf.

Glory., et al. (2018). The Effect of Students’ Worksheet in the Model of Discovery Learning Against the Students’ Ability of Reasoning and Mathematical Communication in the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science of State University of Medan. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 37 (3), 70-82.

Goss, P., Sonnemann, J., and Griffiths, K. (2017). Engaging students: Creating Classrooms That Improve Learning. Grattan Institute

Haylock, D. (1997). Recognizing mathematical creativity in school children. Zentralblattfur Didaktik der Mathematics, 29 (3), 68-74.

Ibrahim, B.,Edral,S & Mustafa, S. (2009). The Effects of Problem-Based Learning Instruction on University Students’ Performance of Conceptual and Quantitative Problems in Gas Concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(2),153-164.

Krulik, S & Rudnick, J.A (1995). The new sourcebook for teaching reasoning and problem solving in elementary school. Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon A Simon & Schuster Company.

Lisda, F. M. (2018). Improving students’ mathematics self-efficacy through problem based learning. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning. 1 (1), 23-28.

Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Self-efficacy in the workplace: impilication for motivation and performance. International Journal of Management, Bussissnes, and Administratio, 14 (1), 1-6.

Mardi,H.R. (2017). Using Discovery Learning to Encourage Creative Thinking. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 4 (2), 98-103.

McGredor, D. (2007). Developing thinking; developing learning: A guide to thinking skills in education. New York, NY: Open University Press

NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The National.

Nuralam & Eliyana. (2017). Penerapan Pendekatan Saintifik Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Di Sman 1 Darul Imarah Aceh Besar. Jurnal Ilmiah Didaktika, 18 (1), 64-76

OECD. (2016). PISA 2016 Teaching Strategies For Instructional Quality. New York: Columbia University

Perez, E. D., & Ye, Y. (2013). The relationship between mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics achievement of mathayomsuksa students in the english program of st. Joseph bangna school. Assumption Journal, 5(2), 82-92.

Petr, S., Tomas, M & Renata, B. (2011). How to increase students' interest in science and technology. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences,12, 168–174

Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences fifth edition. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.

Tatsuoka, M. M. (1971). Multivariate analysis: Techniques for educational and psychological research. New york, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Wrigth, S. (2010). Understanding creativity in early childhood. London: SAGE Publication Ltd.

Yeni., et al. (2017). The Effectiveness of Open-Ended Problems Based Analytic-Synthetic Learning on the Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability of Pre-Service Elementary School Teachers. International Electronic Journal Of Mathematics Education, 12 (3), 655-666.

Zulyadaini. (2017). Development of Student Worksheets Based Realistic Mathematics Education (RME). International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 13 (9), 1-14


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 36 times | PDF view : 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Lisda Fitriana Masitoh, Enggar Prasetyawan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Publisher:

Master Program of Mathematics Education

Graduate Program of Universitas Negeri Makassar

[email protected]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika Indexed by:

 

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License..

View My Stats